D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
This is more the point, haven't been in a position to sponsor really until recently, and spent half the time trying to move *out* the city then, anyway!
JLR have only started doing very well in recent times
I'm hoping they go with Stadium Coventry Arena Bowl.
Otherwise known as the SCAB Stadium.
Wasn't this the original name before Jag pulled out? There was going to be a big cat on the roof and all sorts.
Of course now it's Wasps doing it we need to be bitter, because you know the council. Or something.
We all know where your true loyalties lie.
To me it will always be arena 2000
Went to the rugby today, first and last rugby game i ever been too. It was so sad to be there, just looking at what the Sisu fockwits lost out on. There was entertainment, flowing beers, service behind every till, every turnstyle open, no queues to get into ground and stewards who were helpful and just let everything flow. It has now lost that home feeling for me.
Maybe you can tell us then what they were willing to pay?
Paragraph 41
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/2014-06-30-final-jr-judgement-pdf-16944132-1144-1707475.pdf
Reading this again I see the Ricoh was valued at £37m some years ago. But this was dependent on a team playing at the Ricoh. Perhaps the valuation in the Prospectus may not then be too far off the mark?
Paragraph 41
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/2014-06-30-final-jr-judgement-pdf-16944132-1144-1707475.pdf
Reading this again I see the Ricoh was valued at £37m some years ago. But this was dependent on a team playing at the Ricoh. Perhaps the valuation in the Prospectus may not then be too far off the mark?
Following due diligence, SISU did not wish to offer the price set out in theIndicative Term Sheet, being willing to offer only closer to £2m than £5.5m.
Paragraph 41
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/2014-06-30-final-jr-judgement-pdf-16944132-1144-1707475.pdf
Reading this again I see the Ricoh was valued at £37m some years ago. But this was dependent on a team playing at the Ricoh. Perhaps the valuation in the Prospectus may not then be too far off the mark?
Paragraph 41 does not mention the words '£37m'.
It mentions "...to offer only closer to £2m than £5.5m.
And
"...trustees considered the valuation of ACL may have fallen to £5-6m...."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
So what it is saying is that SISU were offering £2m for 50% which was around the actual value if the lot went for £5.5. So the "SISU wouldn't pay" and "wanted it for nothing" claims aren't true?
Not to mention the council people saying how SISU would be paying well over the odds at £5.5.
paragraph 41 answered the question raised.
paragraph 13 gives value
Paragraph 41
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/2014-06-30-final-jr-judgement-pdf-16944132-1144-1707475.pdf
Reading this again I see the Ricoh was valued at £37m some years ago. But this was dependent on a team playing at the Ricoh. Perhaps the valuation in the Prospectus may not then be too far off the mark?
So what you're seeking to confirm is that Wasps have well and truly ripped off the Council and Higgs Trust. Would have thought that would be the sort of thing you wouldn't want to draw attention to.
So what it is saying is that SISU were offering £2m for 50% which was around the actual value if the lot went for £5.5. So the "SISU wouldn't pay" and "wanted it for nothing" claims aren't true?
Not to mention the council people saying how SISU would be paying well over the odds at £5.5.
So what you're seeking to confirm is that Wasps have well and truly ripped off the Council and Higgs Trust. Would have thought that would be the sort of thing you wouldn't want to draw attention to.
If anything it confirms that SISU deliberately sought to devalue the asset expecting to purchase it on the cheap, they miscalculated and screwed the club as a result.
But it's fine and dandy if that was also Wasps strategy?
But it's fine and dandy if that was also Wasps strategy?
But it's fine and dandy if that was also Wasps strategy?
SISU and Wasps are both commercial concerns
It wasn't though, was it? They didn't play games for 4 years, feigning that they would go elsewhere.
SISU and Wasps are both commercial concerns, one pitched a deal at a level it would be accepted, the other played hard ball too long and screwed up themselves, the club, the fans and ultimately opened the door for Wasps. #idiots
It seems that some can't help but fawn over 'the wasps' or clutch at straws to excuse them. I see even Tony is gracing us with his wit and intellect.
It's not the packaging, it's what's inside that counts....so as long as City keep TM and produce the kind of football to take us into the Championship, and do a good deal to remain at the Arena when the time comes, I really don't care what it's called, or what colour the seats are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?