Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Good point is we are 14 points behind last season already without the points deduction. That's hard to fathom for him to stay.
Frees loans frees loans frees loans , so basically the same as most teams in league 1 then ?
Has danny dyer moved to beduff? You sliceLook mate, I can't stop you being blind, but what I can say is fuck off you muggy c**t.
:welcome:
Only managed to look good with players he didnt even bring inGood point is we are 14 points behind last season already without the points deduction. That's hard to fathom for him to stay.
Has danny dyer moved to beduff? You slice
Its actually 11 in 47 but whose counting9 wins in 39 games, IN SP we trust....lol
Its actually 11 in 47 but whose counting
Totally irrelevant, in fact, the armchair 'lot' have a damn sight more self-respect and common-fucking-sense than the blind Pavlov dogs contributing to the farce of CCFC.
It's like a religion isn't it, supporting CCFC? Blind, baseless faith in a cause that has no tangibility or reward.
Is it not inconceivable to consider that the die-hard CCFC fans are those abstaining from attending matches? Think about it.
Its not really though is it , it could be partly rightWhat a load of self serving bollocks.
What a load of self serving bollocks.
Self-serving??
Never been fond of self-service, I dither a lot.
Logic and common sense does tend to annoy people I guess, but at least CraigSBA partly agrees with me.
Yes he needs to go and here's why:
1. Formations
Close season before last he sells McDonald because he will be playing 451 and won't need him, he then decides to switch to a 442 in which McDonald would have been very useful cover. He does later admit that this was an error to be fair but he does not replace him leaving us desperately short of cover after Clarke's departure.
Last close season he signs Swanson, O'brien and Coulibaly, all wingers, to play in his established 442. He then has his little World Cup Head Storm and switches to 352 leaving us with the wrong personel. The idea that you can play this system without proper wing backs is astonishing in itself.
After a disastrous start to the season he meekly switches back to 442 with hardly a mention!
2. Post-Match Interviews.
Just ridiculous. Full of superlatives and praise after abysmal performances to the point of farce. How can he be taken seriously?
3. Signings.
It does seem that he wouldn't know a player if he was beaten around the face and neck with one. Terrible record. Always banging on about DNA, it seems the required DNA for CCFC is somewhere around the bottom of the genetic barrel.
4. Loans
SP doesn't like loans, he told us so in no uncertain terms quite early in his tenure. We currently have 7.
5. Keepers.
It's plain for all to see that we have a problem here. But instead of bringing in an experienced keeper to steady the ship, SP signs a 7th striker.
6. The dressing room.
There are now indications that he has lost it.
The man is far too flakey for me, changes his mind with the wind, no constant philosophy, always carries an unbalanced squad and frankly I agree with Jordan Clarke, he doesn't know what he's doing and very much appears to be making it up as he goes along.
Please don't tell me he gives youth a chance... firstly, he has little option and secondly that is more to do with club policy than managerial decision making, the club sets the remit, the manager implements.
Bottom line: Not good enough and should go.
Its actually 11 in 47 but whose counting
I wonder if Joyous Joy actually knew we lost yesterday and who it was we were playing against? What's more, does she actually care?
Which part of not going demonstrates "Blind, baseless faith"?
See, now you're not even reading my point properly, mate.
Supporting, I.E. actively attending matches, is blind, baseless faith. In CCFC's circumstances, at least.
Choosing to NOT attend, doesn't make anyone LESS of a die-hard fan, it's basically a testament to how different people deal with the shit state of affairs at the club. Some can endure it, some can't, some WON'T.
Those that won't, are not prepared to endure the aforementioned shit on any level, and thus create distance between themselves and the shit. However, I guarantee they will still be a City fan till the day they die, albeit at a hands-off level.
It's just an opinion of mine, whether anyone likes it or not, I don't give a crap tbh. Just don't try and dissect something you haven't read properly, thanks.
Great.
Ah, well knackers to you n'all - if you can't acknowledge an original point of view, or even read it properly, you're not worth a second thought. You stick with the bullshit view ingrained in your one-track skull.
By the way, the 'sulky, juvenile sarcasm' that you're trying to mimic from other members here only works if you're as half as imaginative as them.
Would you have hit the panic button had you been Mike Ashley a few weeks back?
I know everyone is frustrated but I fail to see changing managers is the answer. Brendan Rogers is finding it difficult after Suarez and the same can be said for the championship player of the month (Wilson) leaving us....it will take time.
Molding a team of youngsters will take time. Ryan Haynes has been sensational and then average and that's what Pressley has to work with and of course the dreaded loan market. I still have confidence in him to get it right. This league is the poorest for some time and there is plenty of games to mount a play off challenge yet.
yp ...sack everyoneAnyone who defends him, are either delusional, or related.
45minutes and not 1 shot on target, the guy is so tactically inept, he makes Thorn look like Mourinho.
Take this thread how you want, I stand by my word, SP needs to go now!
Yes he needs to go and here's why:
1. Formations
Close season before last he sells McDonald because he will be playing 451 and won't need him, he then decides to switch to a 442 in which McDonald would have been very useful cover. He does later admit that this was an error to be fair but he does not replace him leaving us desperately short of cover after Clarke's departure.
Last close season he signs Swanson, O'brien and Coulibaly, all wingers, to play in his established 442. He then has his little World Cup Head Storm and switches to 352 leaving us with the wrong personel. The idea that you can play this system without proper wing backs is astonishing in itself.
After a disastrous start to the season he meekly switches back to 442 with hardly a mention!
2. Post-Match Interviews.
Just ridiculous. Full of superlatives and praise after abysmal performances to the point of farce. How can he be taken seriously?
3. Signings.
It does seem that he wouldn't know a player if he was beaten around the face and neck with one. Terrible record. Always banging on about DNA, it seems the required DNA for CCFC is somewhere around the bottom of the genetic barrel.
4. Loans
SP doesn't like loans, he told us so in no uncertain terms quite early in his tenure. We currently have 7.
5. Keepers.
It's plain for all to see that we have a problem here. But instead of bringing in an experienced keeper to steady the ship, SP signs a 7th striker.
6. The dressing room.
There are now indications that he has lost it.
The man is far too flakey for me, changes his mind with the wind, no constant philosophy, always carries an unbalanced squad and frankly I agree with Jordan Clarke, he doesn't know what he's doing and very much appears to be making it up as he goes along.
Please don't tell me he gives youth a chance... firstly, he has little option and secondly that is more to do with club policy than managerial decision making, the club sets the remit, the manager implements.
Bottom line: Not good enough and should go.
For Pressley It's "Now or Never" that we should "Return to Sender". Some say "Don't be
Cruel", but I think he's "The Devil in Disguise" that will only take us "Way Down".
I'll get my coat.
Ah, well knackers to you n'all - if you can't acknowledge an original point of view, or even read it properly, you're not worth a second thought. You stick with the bullshit view ingrained in your one-track skull.
By the way, the 'sulky, juvenile sarcasm' that you're trying to mimic from other members here only works if you're as half as imaginative as them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?