Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Read the transcript and then come back on and comment on the facts not your prejudice
Read the transcript and then come back on and comment on the facts not your prejudiceIt has been said she took the legal advice to plead guilty believing it was the surest and quickest way to return to her family life and 12 yr old daughter, but it was turned out to be quite the opposite.
I value your opinion and you but please read the transcript and then come back and debateSo you’re happy with that. They released prisoners early so proper criminals out and replaced them with people like her. Glad your happy
Love itHas she a history of formenting trouble and advocating violence? If not I cannot believe the sentence imposed and served so far is not excessively punative.
No I am not going to waste my time reading a transcript, post the salient points that convinced you if you want.
When someone like Nick Griffin never went to prison but Connelly has I don't think you understand how far the British justice system has been turned into a political weapon to silence dissent and freedom of speech even if offensive.
Shots fired by Pete, maybe if I was you I’d go back and view some of the comments you were making about things being ‘inhuman’ was a disgraceLove it
I’m not willing to read 13 pages that answers all the questions I’m raising just in case I look like a prick
Jog on
Has she a history of formenting trouble and advocating violence? If not I cannot believe the sentence imposed and served so far is not excessively punative.
No I am not going to waste my time reading a transcript, post the salient points that convinced you if you want.
When someone like Nick Griffin never went to prison but Connelly has I don't think you understand how far the British justice system has been turned into a political weapon to silence dissent and freedom of speech even if offensive.
Why?Shots fired by Pete, maybe if I was you I’d go back and view some of the comments you were making about things being ‘inhuman’ was a disgrace
Sentencing guidelines were updated in 2020 tooWhat the fuck are you talking about? She wasn't stating a public opinion she was inciting violence. Griffin never said anything as stark as that.
The powers used to convict her were brought in 1986 by Maggie Thatcher's government, the relevant section remains unchanged in England since then. Are you saying that she made the British justice system a political weapon to silence dissent and freedom of speech?
View attachment 43296
The whole situation saying it’s inhuman to let that scumbag have boiling water and then you getting all defensiveWhy?
Point them out and I’m happy to explain myself
Pretty sure I stand by all I said about risk and how this is managed when someone is in prison for I think 55 years.The whole situation saying it’s inhuman to let that scumbag have boiling water and then you getting all defensive
The fucker shouldn’t even have access to cold water let alone a hot drink after what he did, ridiculous comment again from yourselfThink I was suggesting it was inhuman not to give him access to a hot drink
And ……..What the fuck are you talking about? She wasn't stating a public opinion she was inciting violence. Griffin never said anything as stark as that.
The powers used to convict her were brought in 1986 by Maggie Thatcher's government, the relevant section remains unchanged in England since then. Are you saying that she made the British justice system a political weapon to silence dissent and freedom of speech?
View attachment 43296
Ok yep the hang em flog em brigade whataboutery. How do you manage that person. You’ve no idea have youThe fucker shouldn’t even have access to cold water let alone a hot drink after what he did, ridiculous comment again from yourself
I think people feel the sentence doesn't reflect the crime, I'm not saying that a crime wasn't committed, clearly it was.Sentencing guidelines were updated in 2020 too
Because he's the Prime Minister allegedly, he was telling the judges what sentences to hand out
I think people feel the sentence doesn't reflect the crime, I'm not saying that a crime wasn't committed, clearly it was.
But (imo) releasing other prisoners, some of whom have committed far worse offenses and then imprisoning a mother for a post seems to be very OTT.
How many of us have said something in the heat of the moment that we later regret,
(Like "will you marry me")
In this case, once you post on the cesspit of social media, it's there for everyone to see.
Agree with all of thatI think people feel the sentence doesn't reflect the crime, I'm not saying that a crime wasn't committed, clearly it was.
But (imo) releasing other prisoners, some of whom have committed far worse offenses and then imprisoning a mother for a post seems to be very OTT.
How many of us have said something in the heat of the moment that we later regret,
(Like "will you marry me")
In this case, once you post on the cesspit of social media, it's there for everyone to see.
I would hazard a guess that not many of us have called for the burning down of migrant accommodation during a period of widespread racist violence.How many of us have said something in the heat of the moment that we later regret,
Absolutely embarrassing once again, get a fucking gripOk yep the hang em flog em brigade whataboutery. How do you manage that person. You’ve no idea have you
That’s part of the inconsistency of the defence and mitigation and the appeala mother
Your opinionAbsolutely embarrassing once again, get a fucking grip
Any comment on what we’re discussingAbsolutely embarrassing once again, get a fucking grip
I think even fewer of us would of acted upon a social media postI would hazard a guess that not many of us have called for the burning down of migrant accommodation during a period of widespread racist violence.
That’s part of the inconsistency of the defence and mitigation and the appeal
She’s really suffered losing her child and understands how those affected feel so didn’t empathise but sought to inflame the situation and cause more distress and fear
Trying to incite violence is a crime. Sorry.I think even fewer of us would of acted upon a social media post
Seems like Connolly wasn’t the only one trying to “play the mental health card”.a mother
It is, and if you read my first post above, you'd see I say as much.Trying to incite violence is a crime. Sorry.
And let's remember, Starmer was the man who refused to prosecute Jimmy Saville, even when presented with overwhelming evidence.
2 tier justice system?
I disagree,2 tier fact system it seems. That’s simply untrue.
I disagree,
But how about Starmer's refusal to sanction a full public enquiry into the Muslim rape gangs???
You can be locked up for a post, but don't even get investigated properly for organised sexual abuse and rape of under age girls?
She has thousands of followers and the post was shared almost a thousand times, viewed by hundreds of thousands of people.It is, and if you read my first post above, you'd see I say as much.
But the punishment has to fit the crime.
Was anybody motivated to burn down a hotel purely on the strength of one social media post that was seen by hardly anyone?
It's not even as if she had any followers.
Justice for the victims would be a start.What are you seeking to get out of such an inquiry that has not already been investigated and reported upon?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?