Gynnsthetonic
Well-Known Member
Because he's the Prime Minister allegedly, he was telling the judges what sentences to hand out
Because he's the Prime Minister allegedly, he was telling the judges what sentences to hand outShe pleaded guilty? What's it got to do with Starmer?
She didn't fck about, a few little hurty words on the Internet. Anjem Choudry got less for supporting Islamic State. Handy when your a trained solicitor
She didn't fck about, a few little hurty words on the Internet. Anjem Choudry got less for supporting Islamic State. Handy when your a trained solicitor
He served just over 2 years getting let out earlyNo he didn't, he got 5 and a half years.
False equivalence they haven’t admitted inciting racial hatredWhat a waste of resources, I'm sure she's served long enough, what good is it doing with her locked up inside. Meanwhile Ricky Jones walks free so do the 2 pakistani airport attackers. Its all so wrong.
He served just over 2 years getting let out early
Busy man!Because he's the Prime Minister allegedly, he was telling the judges what sentences to hand out
What I don’t understand is what has two tier justice or starmer making his speech on far right hate speech got to do with someone pleading guilty to inciting racial hatredLucy Connelly got fast tracked the others havnt that's what I'm on about!
Nothing to do with starmer it’s a Tory givebrment set of legislationA school teacher and mother of a young child. She said something in the heat of the moment which she then took down. It's pathetic and just being made an example of. How many hotels got burnt down on her say so, none. Starmer is just a c**t. Two tiers example at its finest!
So you put these 2 on a par then, both similar characters?Yes and this woman is to serve a year.
It's storing up problems in the future and everyone involved in these particular cases,or most of them have served enough time and need to be released, not blight their lives forever,a short sharp shock is all that was required and that point has passed by now.Busy man!
He was not that would be a huge over reachBecause he's the Prime Minister allegedly, he was telling the judges what sentences to hand out
That’s true and I think rightIt's storing up problems in the future and everyone involved in these particular cases,or most of them have served enough time and need to be released, not blight their lives forever,a short sharp shock is all that was required and that point has passed by now.
So you put these 2 on a par then, both similar characters?
Again I think the point is correct the sentences are incomparable for the action but that doesn’t take into account what was happening or what Lucy Connolly was advised to plead guilty too31 months is less than 66 months.
12 months is less than 25 months.
Absolutely nobody is putting them on a par except you.
Whatever the denial, clearly she is a racist (they almost went for the 'but I've got a black friend') and she's not a very nice person, but plenty of other racists and other horrible people who get far less. She'll lose her job, will be forever tarnished, has received her shock sentence and I see no benefit to anyone in keeping her locked up.
Yet Tommy Robinson who has served less due out imminently. Yes I understand different crimes and sentences, but to compare the two and leave one in and release the other, you have to question the sensibility.Interesting comment the three judges said the sentence wasn’t manifestly wrong and …
"was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected".
Yep agreedYet Tommy Robinson who has served less due out imminently. Yes I understand different crimes and sentences, but to compare the two and leave one in and release the other, you have to question the sensibility.
Surely bravado though. This was unprecedented and nobody could've forseen what was to follow or the sentences passed. Presumably and hopefully a deterrent for the future to others, although the cunts that threw bricks at the police obviously have no rationale and I'd wager would do so again at any other civil disorder.Yeah she knew full well what she was doing:
The court heard that the day before Connolly was arrested, she sent a WhatsApp message saying the “raging tweet about burning down hotels has bit me on the arse lol”.
She also said she would “play the mental health card” if arrested, and would deny responsibility for the post if asked.
She was told she'd serve 40% of her sentence as wellHe served just over 2 years getting let out early
So you don't think the laws of the land should apply? Is it a Reform policy to revoke them?The only good thing is it will just point more people towards Reform and consign Labour to the dustbin
So your happy with that. They released prisoners early so proper criminals out and replaced them with people like her. Glad your happyShe was told she'd serve 40% of her sentence as well
Disagree. Until there is proportional representation it will push more of the centre right further to the right but ultimately split the vote further and in a three party split will give Labour continued control.The only good thing is it will just point more people towards Reform and consign Labour to the dustbin
What putting nasty things on the Internet after one of the worst atrocities this country has ever seen. Lineker can do it and get away with it.So you don't think the laws of the land should apply? Is it a Reform policy to revoke them?
He can do what and get away with it? Aren't you talking about the woman encouraging people to burn down hotels and effectively murder people?What putting nasty things on the Internet after one of the worst atrocities this country has ever seen. Lineker can do it and get away with it.
I blame Eni AlukoHe can do what and get away with it? Aren't you talking about the woman encouraging people to burn down hotels and effectively murder people?
It has been said she took the legal advice to plead guilty believing it was the surest and quickest way to return to her family life and 12 yr old daughter, but it was turned out to be quite the opposite.What I don’t understand is what has two tier justice or starmer making his speech on far right hate speech got to do with someone pleading guilty to inciting racial hatred
Why aren’t they picking on the solicitor who gave such shocking advice?
It's ironic that people go on about people coming to the UK should respect it's laws etc but don't actually like it when they're applied.It has been said she took the legal advice to plead guilty believing it was the surest and quickest way to return to her family life and 12 yr old daughter, but it was turned out to be quite the opposite.
It has been said she took the legal advice to plead guilty believing it was the surest and quickest way to return to her family life and 12 yr old daughter, but it was turned out to be quite the opposite.
How??The only good thing is it will just point more people towards Reform and consign Labour to the dustbin
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?