Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Southampton v Coventry FA Disciplinary (12 Viewers)

  • Thread starter alexccfc99
  • Start date Yesterday at 4:32 PM
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:32 PM
  • #1
https://www.thefa.com/-/media/files/thefaportal/governance-docs/discipline-cases/2025-26/the-fa-v-southampton-fc-and-coventry-city-fc.ashx
 
Reactions: torchomatic

SkyBlue_Adam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:43 PM
  • #2
Southampton.. grasses
 

Hutch11

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:47 PM
  • #3
Snitches get stitches
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:48 PM
  • #4
'Coventry started it', did we? And is that sort of playground argument all people need now?
 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:51 PM
  • #5
Brighton Sky Blue said:
'Coventry started it', did we? And is that sort of playground argument all people need now?
Click to expand...

Well FL did yes by responding to outside noise from fans. It was an emotional response and really not a good look (That's ok people make mistakes)

The sanction is fair but I'm glad we didn't respond as it would all just descent into he said she said, and the reality is we had a fine £7.5k more than Southampton so big whoop.
 
Reactions: wingy

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:51 PM
  • #6
Given the outside legal help Southampton paid for they've probably come out of it worse than if they'd just said like us "yeah, fuck it"
 
Reactions: wingy, eastwoodsdustman, I_Saw_Shaw_Score and 4 others

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:52 PM
  • #7
skybluegod said:
Well FL did yes by responding to outside noise from fans. It was an emotional response and really not a good look (That's ok people make mistakes)

The sanction is fair but I'm glad we didn't respond as it would all just descent into he said she said, and the reality is we had a fine £7.5k more than Southampton so big whoop.
Click to expand...
Fuck that, if people can't take being clapped at after abusing someone for 90 minute then they can fucking get right in the sea. Luckily for them it is that far to go.
 
Last edited: Yesterday at 4:59 PM
Reactions: wingy, Skybluekyle, HadjiChippo and 5 others

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:54 PM
  • #8
skybluegod said:
Well FL did yes by responding to outside noise from fans. It was an emotional response and really not a good look (That's ok people make mistakes)

The sanction is fair but I'm glad we didn't respond as it would all just descent into he said she said, and the reality is we had a fine £7.5k more than Southampton so big whoop.
Click to expand...
He didn't do anything offensive or obscene. Their players reacted by swarming around him which in turn dragged our players in.

Not sure why our fine is bigger on that basis.
 
Reactions: Paul Anthony and TomRad85

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:56 PM
  • #9
Fuck me i couldn't be arsed to read all of it but Lampard has them on strings That is absolutely fantastic.
 
Reactions: Briles and CovRes

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:57 PM
  • #10
Parachute teams really cannot take anything can they. If something is going against them they get so rattled.
 
Reactions: CovRes

Ccfc_Addy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:57 PM
  • #11
"It was alleged that following completion of the Match, Southampton and Coventry each failed to ensure that their players and/or technical area staff did not behave in a way which was improper and/or provocative"

This catastrophic use of language is going to keep me up at night. They failed to ensure that their players and/or technical area staff did not behave in a way that was improper? What??
 
Reactions: itsabuzzard, wingy, StrettoBoy and 1 other person

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 4:59 PM
  • #12
He concluded by saying that he was a big and tall player and always wanted to try and protect people if he could.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01 and dadgad
B

Bristol sky blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:03 PM
  • #13
Would not be that surprised if FL offered to repay the fine himself to Doug King... probably worth £30k of his considerable money to goad fans who have been absolute arses towards him in the past, apparently
 

prufrock

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:04 PM
  • #14
Brighton Sky Blue said:
He didn't do anything offensive or obscene. Their players reacted by swarming around him which in turn dragged our players in.

Not sure why our fine is bigger on that basis.
Click to expand...
Our defence seemed to consist of saying was "cba with this" and so they didn't reduce the fine. However it was probably worth paying a few k more in fines not to have to deal with the paperwork which no doubt would also need legal sign off which would likely be a few k anyway.
i'm still quite happy that they didn't take that southampton player Santos at his word when he was sprinting over to Frank. Total lies by him. Joe Edwards stopped him with good reason.
 
Reactions: skybluegod

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:04 PM
  • #15
Fucks sake that’s the rest of the January transfer budget gone then
 
Reactions: Skybluekyle, HadjiChippo, RoysterE17 and 4 others

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:05 PM
  • #16
The "commisson" was surprised we didn't want a hearing and offered no defence.

That is us basically saying Southampton fans are cunts, we'll pay the fine.
 
Reactions: nightowl1883, HadjiChippo, MaltaSkyBlue and 3 others

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:06 PM
  • #17
He had heard FL say “go away you stupid little boy”
Click to expand...
Harwood Bellis mogged
 
Reactions: HadjiChippo, CovRes, SAJ and 1 other person

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:06 PM
  • #18
prufrock said:
Our defence seemed to consist of saying was "cba with this" and so they didn't reduce the fine. However it was probably worth paying a few k more in fines not to have to deal with the paperwork which no doubt would also need legal sign off which would likely be a few k anyway.
i'm still quite happy that they didn't take that southampton player Santos at his word when he was sprinting over to Frank. Total lies by him. Joe Edwards stopped him with good reason.
Click to expand...
This report also ignores the most basic context: we had just held on for a point having played with 10 men for about 50 minutes and FL himself had been taking abuse from the stands. He did a fist pump in their direction, that was it.

Our players and staff probably saw theirs going over to him and wanted to defend him. That's all there was to it really.
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:07 PM
  • #19
Really enjoyed that write up. Love how they put this whole case together and gave statements and we we just like yeh okay. Bet they paid more than the 7 grand difference or whatever in man hours.

Also love this:

FL had said to him “you’re a young lad – show me some respect”. FL had repeated the comment but had not said anything else that THB could hear.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:07 PM
  • #20
Ccfc_Addy said:
"It was alleged that following completion of the Match, Southampton and Coventry each failed to ensure that their players and/or technical area staff did not behave in a way which was improper and/or provocative"

This catastrophic use of language is going to keep me up at night. They failed to ensure that their players and/or technical area staff did not behave in a way that was improper? What??
Click to expand...


 
Reactions: Skybluekyle, HadjiChippo, JohnWH and 1 other person

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:10 PM
  • #21
I like how in the mitigations that SFC conveniently forget Scienza rushing over first to have a pop.
 
A

AJB1983

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:10 PM
  • #22
Harwood Bellis obviously said something to Lampard, not that he admitted it, for him to say go away little boy show me some respect
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:11 PM
  • #23
robbiekeane said:
Really enjoyed that write up. Love how they put this whole case together and gave statements and we we just like yeh okay. Bet they paid more than the 7 grand difference or whatever in man hours.

Also love this:

FL had said to him “you’re a young lad – show me some respect”. FL had repeated the comment but had not said anything else that THB could hear.
Click to expand...
Hiring a QC and 2 outside lawyers, won't be cheap.
 
B

Bristol sky blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:23 PM
  • #24
Anyone know the outcome of the Bristol C v Millwall players / staff altercation? That was far more interesting, really!
 

Grimetime

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:29 PM
  • #25
That's Southampton into Cat A+ from now on then!
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01, Skybluekyle, HadjiChippo and 5 others

Colin Steins Smile

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:34 PM
  • #26
David O'Day said:
Hiring a QC and 2 outside lawyers, won't be cheap.
Click to expand...
Minimum cost for QC is £600 per hour. Southampton will have paid far more than £30k for the fine and legal costs, unless they've decided to cover this via their legal insurance.
 
R

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:44 PM
  • #27
Whinging load of ex-prem cunts!! trying to pin it all on Frank backfired too, Harwood-Bellis is a proper child act, ffs grow up and grow a pair.

Good job the board didn't fall for their bollox and it was as much their fault as ours. Nice to see some passion and aggression from the backroom staff.
 

Sky Blue Wozza

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:56 PM
  • #28
Representing Coventry City FC
 
Reactions: Skybluekyle, ptr, acs and 5 others

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:00 PM
  • #29
Sky Blue Wozza said:
Representing Coventry City FCView attachment 48545
Click to expand...
I can do this cheaper. Otis will confirm.
 
Reactions: CovRes and Sky Blue Wozza

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:03 PM
  • #30
Colin Steins Smile said:
Minimum cost for QC is £600 per hour. Southampton will have paid far more than £30k for the fine and legal costs, unless they've decided to cover this via their legal insurance.
Click to expand...
makes it sweeter that we just went "ok"
 
Reactions: Colin Steins Smile, skybluelee, eyesee and 1 other person

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:05 PM
  • #31
skybluecam said:
Fucks sake that’s the rest of the January transfer budget gone then
Click to expand...
One weeks wages for Gus.
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:06 PM
  • #32
Grimetime said:
That's Southampton into Cat A+ from now on then!
Click to expand...
No... category C - U, Next Tuesday
 
S

Snaily

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:18 PM
  • #33
Southampton pay c25k in legal fees to reduce their fine by £7.5k!
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:24 PM
  • #34
That’s hilarious
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 6:29 PM
  • #35
skybluecam said:
Fucks sake that’s the rest of the January transfer budget gone then
Click to expand...

I think most of that has already gone on Doug's annual Antarctic expedition.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • andy86A moment ago
  • itsabuzzard10 minutes ago
  • ... and 4 more.
  • Total: 13 (members: 6, guests: 7)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?