Nick
Administrator
To be honest, there seem to be a few doing that.
Its like Sisu are holding a knife to CCFC throat
No one else can be doing that as they do not own us.To be honest, there seem to be a few doing that.
So no other actions have consequences?No one else can be doing that as they do not own us.
Absolutely no chance of us starting in thr conference or league two. I'm lolling at you're rangers comparison.It's there decision.
Rangers did exactly the same about the time Sisu started this nonsense.
Look what happened to them.
Bring it on.
The "other side" are not having to do much for this supposed takeover though are they
Just have to say "no we wont deal with you, and you are on your own, bye"
Of course, but holding up a bank, with a hostage (knife to throat) the people you are negotiating with can, "not give in to demands" and cause you to harm the hostage, but who is holding the knife??So no other actions have consequences?
No one else can be doing that as they do not own us.
Of course, but holding up a bank, with a hostage (knife to throat) the people you are negotiating with can, "not give in to demands" and cause you to harm the hostage, but who is holding the knife??
Of course, but holding up a bank, with a hostage (knife to throat) the people you are negotiating with can, "not give in to demands" and cause you to harm the hostage, but who is holding the knife??
The only hostage is CCFC the stadium and the training center were released by the hostage takers.If you say you dont need the industrial unit, say your going else where. and they change the locks you would complain???
The only hostage is CCFC the stadium and the training center were released by the hostage takers.
If you say you dont need the industrial unit, say your going else where. and they change the locks you would complain???
You do say that you want the industrial unit. But you are bringing court action against someone against who helped them take over the industrial unit. So they say they won't carry on with talks on you staying there unless all legal action stops. And they won't have talks on what would be agreed on if you did stop all action.If you say you dont need the industrial unit, say your going else where. and they change the locks you would complain???
is it ? I don't see any associated court cases. "we don't want to deal with you" is legal and effective but it is not aimed at CCFC it is firmly directed at SISU. Taking any guesses about how they might respond? Think I can guess
I think it is not an out right aggressive stance it is just "no we have other plans" that has consequences certainly for CCFC, our club is no longer a priority, can no longer expect any favours, literally has to stand on its own two feet (which will mean doing deals with devil to survive in the end). Does it mean there is a conspiracy to remove the owners? not sure perhaps. Pretty certain that I don't know anyone who wouldn't be glad to see SISU go though. Clubs reaction has been wounded "victim" statements that in effect burn more bridges in the hope of unity behind them from the fans - cant help feeling that they have misread that again, the fans seem as divided as ever
You do say that you want the industrial unit. But you are bringing court action against someone against who helped them take over the industrial unit. So they say they won't carry on with talks on you staying there unless all legal action stops. And they won't have talks on what would be agreed on if you did stop all action.
The fans have always been divided.
A good example is PWKH coming out and making that statement yesterday and "ccfc fans" congratulating him on screwing the club over and getting one up without actually knowing or considering the consequences.
Not if your hatred for the person presently renting the unit or support for the new owner comes before anything else it seems.Surely that industrial unit (the chance to work from there) is then a hostage, until the ransom of the legal action being stopped happens?
but I am not at all surprised they are not
Not if your hatred for the person presently renting the unit or support for the new owner comes before anything else it seems.
Maybe liquidation is the plan.
Then we can indeed play at the Butts alongside Cov rugby club and not need any expansion.
Does the clause stop us having an Academy then? I can tell you now it doesn't. But agree the fans should be behind the club, but I am not at all surprised they are not
I assume with liquidation they would sell any assists first which for me would include the club the golden share would be worth something to someone
I assume with liquidation they would sell any assists first which for me would include the club the golden share would be worth something to someone
The fans have always been divided.
A good example is PWKH coming out and making that statement yesterday and "ccfc fans" congratulating him on screwing the club over and getting one up without actually knowing or considering the consequences.
We discussed liquidation and the Golden Share back in 2013 - it's too long ago for my memory. But I seem to remember that the Golden Share is not a commercial product you can buy or sell. I believe it's the property of the FL and is granted to a club that ticks a lot of boxes - for instance has a place to play, players to play, fit and proper owners etc.
(Astute beat me to it)
It has been stated enough times that the golden share can't be sold. It is given to clubs by the FA. And it can be taken away. It stays with the club whatever until taken away. You buy the club you get the golden share.
Having now read that CET section.
I wouldn't put much credence on it.
I would base your opinions on whether people are whooping from the sides or congratulating PWKH on wha mt you see read here.
I assume with liquidation they would sell any assists first which for me would include the club the golden share would be worth something to someone
You really believe all the bullshit they tell you don't you?
Is that not the same as what CCFC said to ACL, that people got angry about?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?