So last season we were forced to play too many children. This season we need time to gel.
If this is the case I would expect the 3 teams who are top of the League to have fairly settled teams carried over from last season.
So on Saturday how many débuts did the teams with 100% records hand out;
Tranmere - 7
Notts County - 6
Doncaster - 6
I can understand Preston struggling (well they have 1 point less than us) - they handed 10 players débuts on Saturday.
So - why have other teams started so well and yet have the same or more additions to the first team.
Were Yeovil not favourites for Relegation though?
Well county have played crewe and hartlepool, donny have played walsall and bury. Four teams guaranteed to finish anywhere from 16th downwards
Yeovil made 6 debutants on Saturday as well.
So last season we were forced to play too many children. This season we need time to gel.
If this is the case I would expect the 3 teams who are top of the League to have fairly settled teams carried over from last season.
So on Saturday how many débuts did the teams with 100% records hand out;
Tranmere - 7
Notts County - 6
Doncaster - 6
I can understand Preston struggling (well they have 1 point less than us) - they handed 10 players débuts on Saturday.
So - why have other teams started so well and yet have the same or more additions to the first team.
Should be an easy 3 points then on Saturday -- and what about Tranmere? 7 new players Saturday?
be patient with the new lads and be optimistic that come january we will still be in touch and then we should start to see huge improvments in performances. At the moment results are key not performance and if we can big up wins and draws without playing a solid 90 mins that will come.
How many started or were brought off the bench? I think it depends on which positions and who you still have led in your squad. 5 of our front 6 (midfield and strikers) who started on Saturday were debut's, that's the whole of the midfield the engine room of the team. Cody was the only player in the front 6 who started. Whereas 4 of the back 5 were here last season.
Yh but what has become clear is Yeovil were severely underestimated which was shown in their 3-1 win over 'play-off' hopefuls brentford
How many started or were brought off the bench? I think it depends on which positions and who you still have led in your squad. 5 of our front 6 (midfield and strikers) who started on Saturday were debut's, that's the whole of the midfield the engine room of the team. Cody was the only player in the front 6 who started. Whereas 4 of the back 5 were here last season.
All this time to gel business is about fine tuning.
The first half against Sheff Utd has got nothing to do with fine tuning. No tempo, no desire, poor passing, simple mistakes. Its just an excuse that the fans are clinging to rather than think the latest group aren't quite as good as they hoped.
And look how poorly the defence played as a whole. Perhaps they need more time to gel?
They were awful! Absolutely awful.Maybe Sheff Utd were over estimated? I didn't rate them at all!
Disagree - performance is vital - it shows that correct tactics are deployed and a cohesive approach. We cannot afford to wait anywhere near that long for an improvement.
They were awful! Absolutely awful.
I do think another factor is that almost none of our players have no RECENT experience on this league. It may take a while to adapt.
I was talking about the yeovil game.
Its an intresting topic. Depends on systems and style of play as well. A player coming from a team that is about say for example moving the ball directly and quickly forward will struggle with a team that has a patient passing approach. Players play in teams and it takes awhile for them to adjust as they can be so used to playing a set way in another side. I feel that Jennings and Fleck may take time to adjust but Kilbane i thought should have hit the ground running. Again the work done in training is vital to easing players in.
My own club is an example of this. Three years ago we got essentially an entire new team and we finished 7th out of 14 in the divsion we play in. Howver the followwing season we exactly the same players as we did not have one new addition we finished 2nd and got promoted. We were more comfortable with each other and adapted to what our manager wanted us too do. That is the case with any club and any players, yes some players will adapt sooner but in general every team will take awhile of playing together to gel.
be patient with the new lads and be optimistic that come january we will still be in touch and then we should start to see huge improvments in performances. At the moment results are key not performance and if we can big up wins and draws without playing a solid 90 mins that will come.
good post, it is not just the number of players introduced. It is the players themselves.
Wood and Malaga for example have quickly formed a partnership. When Edge and Malaga played together in friendles it was obvious for all to see that they would take longer to gel.
It is also the amount of time they get to play together. Yeovil for example have half the squad size of us. I am guessing in their friendlies a lot of them would have got a bit more playing time together.
To be honest it is a bit of a recognised fact of footballing life that new players in a team take time to settle.
Some dont, look at Robbie Keane. Others do, the man utd goalie. Gary macalister at cov, took a bit of time.
Personally I don't care about other teams, we have an away draw, I will take them all day long. We also have a home draw against one of the better teams in the division.
We will get better as our players bed in. No question mark in my mind.
It has to happen, the likes of Barton reading codey's runs, Malaga understanding when Clarke and hussey are likely to make a move.
Fleck having confidence that Jennings can cover him etc....
All these things take time. Is that really that impossible to comprehend.
Ah right so it's just OUR players who take time to gel I see. The other teams players must be all English all played in league 1 and all played the same system - is that the argument?
All of that makes perfect sense but I dont think that's the issue. We in the main so far are failing at the basic stuff. Passing, movement, effort and desire. These have got nothing to do with the magical gelling process and upon completion, telepathic understanding is fused into the DNA of the team.
How long does it take to 'gel'? An entire season?
Ah right so it's just OUR players who take time to gel I see. The other teams players must be all English all played in league 1 and all played the same system - is that the argument?
No just that we will get better. Other teams who have new players will take time to gel and the dynamics in different teams will be different.
I am not too concerned about other teams we have had a couple of good results and will get better as our team gels. That can only be a good thing and that I find it strange that anyone who knows anything about football, would be surprised at the idea that 6 or 7 New players in a team will get better as the season goes on and they develop better understanding of each other.
It's just that it seems to some that we're the only team that needs to gel.
TBF I don't think anyone has actually said that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?