Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

So are many of us! (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter luwalla
  • Start date Aug 26, 2016
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
L

luwalla

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #1
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ews/im-scratching-head-coventry-city-11803145

Sold for peanuts , no rumours of unrest, one of the players of the season ( in the first 2/3 of the season at least ) and a player we could have done with in the squid for sure... totally baffling.

Wish the club would just come out and say he done a john terry and gave mowbrays missus a foot massage, then at least we could understand it!
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #2
Mowbray said it was his choice didn't he?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #3
You musn't have been at the match Saturday, Mascherano he was not! Nearly gave away a goal to Reid in the first half dithering on the ball - Reid really should have scored, then he and his other centre back were miles apart for the Agyei goal.

Still, it's another negative story about CCFC from the Telegraph.
 
Reactions: Pipehitterz and Skyblueweeman
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #4
Nick said:
Mowbray said it was his choice didn't he?
Click to expand...

Was it really?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #5
Kingokings204 said:
Was it really?
Click to expand...

So he is lying?

It is getting a bit embarrassing at how keen people are to keep the rage up.
 
Reactions: Martin180 and Skyblueweeman
L

luwalla

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #6
Nick said:
Mowbray said it was his choice didn't he?
Click to expand...

Genuine question.. Did he?

If he did then that answers the question I guess, but thought he was still under contract with us... So wasn't really his choice
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #7
luwalla said:
Genuine question.. Did he?

If he did then that answers the question I guess, but thought he was still under contract with us... So wasn't really his choice
Click to expand...

I mean Mowbray's choice
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #8
Like with Aaron Martin, I can accept letting him go if we bring someone in that is at least of the same standard if not better.

The thing is, we'll have to wait until Wednesday to find out if that's happened.

I am worried at the lack of people in the team willing to make a tackle though, we'd get out muscled by the Coventry United Ladies team at the moment.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #9
We have been like it for years, even last season Vincelot turned into a bit of a pussy.

It took Lamieries to wind Millwall up, he is about the only one who seems to get a bit wound up and stick a boot in.
 
Reactions: luwalla, ClarkeZ and Skyblueweeman

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #10
Mowbray wouldn't even play him in midfield towards the end of last season and results improved.

Fucking hell he's past 30 and has played for mediocre clubs all his life and now can't even play in his correct position.
 
Reactions: Martin180
L

luwalla

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #11
Ahh Mowbray let him go... Understand now, still, strange decision then. Can only presume he had someone better lined up & that either fell through or is still waiting to happen, but either way he needed to free up Vincent's wages maybe
 

Martin180

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #12
Another ex-player who suddenly becomes amazing ......
 
Reactions: Pipehitterz

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #13
I'd have happily kept him, but there were a few times where he gave the ball away in the worst possible positions so I'd hope for Bradford's sake they don't intend on him playing at the back for them all season.
 

Martin180

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #14
Would someone like Lawton be seen as his long term replacement?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #15
Martin180 said:
Would someone like Lawton be seen as his long term replacement?
Click to expand...

Have never seen him play, but from the way he has been described and from how he comes across he would bring a bit of passion into the team.
 

Martin180

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #16
As dire as things are currently it might force Moggas hand and play more of our academy .Who knows we might unearth 2-3 gems
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #17
Martin180 said:
As dire as things are currently it might force Moggas hand and play more of our academy .Who knows we might unearth 2-3 gems
Click to expand...

And lose every game between now and next Christmas...
 
Reactions: rondog1973

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #18
Nick said:
So he is lying?
Click to expand...
No, he is under contract
 

Martin180

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #19
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
And lose every game between now and next Christmas...
Click to expand...
You really believe that would happen ?
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1

afan4life

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #20
Nick said:
Mowbray said it was his choice didn't he?
Click to expand...
let me give you a scenario;
TM; I have to have more players and soon
Sisu : Sorry whatever your name is but we don't have any money
TM: What about the sales of Maddison.etc etc etc ?
Sisu: Don't concern yourself with that Tom, its gone
TM: but I don't have enough players to even stay in Div One
Sisu: Well Bradford have offered some money for the French chap with the beard if you say yes you can have some of the dosh Tim
TM; Do it

SO Tony's choice then????
 
Reactions: rondog1973 and StevieM

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #21
afan4life said:
let me give you a scenario;
TM; I have to have more players and soon
Sisu : Sorry whatever your name is but we don't have any money
TM: What about the sales of Maddison.etc etc etc ?
Sisu: Don't concern yourself with that Tom, its gone
TM: but I don't have enough players to even stay in Div One
Sisu: Well Bradford have offered some money for the French chap with the beard if you say yes you can have some of the dosh Tim
TM; Do it

SO Tony's choice then????
Click to expand...

First, who is Tom.

Second, we brought in a player after he went didn't we?
 

Joy Division

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #22
Grendel said:
Mowbray wouldn't even play him in midfield towards the end of last season and results improved.

Fucking hell he's past 30 and has played for mediocre clubs all his life and now can't even play in his correct position.
Click to expand...

What does his past history of clubs have to do with anything. Do all our other players have a history of playing for great clubs?
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #23
afan4life said:
let me give you a scenario;
TM; I have to have more players and soon
Sisu : Sorry whatever your name is but we don't have any money
TM: What about the sales of Maddison.etc etc etc ?
Sisu: Don't concern yourself with that Tom, its gone
TM: but I don't have enough players to even stay in Div One
Sisu: Well Bradford have offered some money for the French chap with the beard if you say yes you can have some of the dosh Tim
TM; Do it

SO Tony's choice then????
Click to expand...
afan4life invents ascenario4awhine
 
Reactions: Esoterica and Grendel
S

SkyBlueCharlie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #24
The real issue for me is letting both Fleck and Vincelot go without effectively replacing either of them. When you rip the heart out of your midfield you just have expect problems.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #25
SkyBlueCharlie said:
The real issue for me is letting both Fleck and Vincelot go without effectively replacing either of them. When you rip the heart out of your midfield you just have expect problems.
Click to expand...

Isn't that why he brought Gadzev / Rose in and then added McCann?
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman
L

luwalla

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #26
Martin180 said:
Another ex-player who suddenly becomes amazing ......
Click to expand...
Don't think anyone is saying that...
 
Reactions: Joy Division and Earlsdon_Skyblue1
D

Deleted member 2477

Guest
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #27
Its funny how most last season were saying vincelot was the player we had been missing for several years and his performancies were making him a contender for player of the season are now saying he was crap and average. If we had the choice im sure he would get in our team now and improve it but as usual some on here and cet site seem to think they know best aka grendel.

Vincelot showed passion and agression in our midfield which we lack now. He only slumped when the rest of team did so going on grendels comments we should have got rid of them all as they were shit
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #28
marcusp said:
Its funny how most last season were saying vincelot was the player we had been missing for several years and his performancies were making him a contender for player of the season are now saying he was crap and average. If we had the choice im sure he would get in our team now and improve it but as usual some on here and cet site seem to think they know best aka grendel.

Vincelot showed passion and agression in our midfield which we lack now. He only slumped when the rest of team did so going on grendels comments we should have got rid of them all as they were shit
Click to expand...

The first lot of games (maybe 10 - 15) he was a warrior. He was going in on people and usually taking a yellow. He was winning most things in the air and scored a couple of goals.

Then the second half he was nowhere, I cant remember which game it was where he got absolutely bullied (It could have been Morsy when he was at Chesterfield) but Vincelot stood about 10-15 yards away from him every time. He was petrified of him.
 
S

SkyBlueCharlie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #29
Nick said:
Isn't that why he brought Gadzev / Rose in and then added McCann?
Click to expand...
I did say ' effectively'!
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #30
SkyBlueCharlie said:
I did say ' effectively'!
Click to expand...

Then again it is on Mowbray, it is not as if they were panicked as he knew in advance and got them in ready.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #31
Classic!

John it's a no brainer really.On the Monday TM was explaining his plans for the midfield which when reading his comments was obviously being built around Vincelot.On the Wednesday he was on his way to Bradford for what TM described as footballing reasons.No Mr Mowbray he was sold for cash reasons. Seppala it seems made you sell him if that was not the case why did you not keep him,footballing reasons my a**e. There are two lots of guilty parties here.Firstly the fans who have selfishly supported SISU when they must know they are prolonging the agony.When supporters refused to go to Northampton CCFC were brought to heel despite the wicked witch claiming she would never return as a tenant.Had the fans adopted the same attitude at the Ricoh then SISU would have been forced to act Obviously SISU are the main cause of our decline,when will the fans realise that hedgefunders are like vultures.They pick the carcass clean then leave it to wither away.Sadly the withering process has begun.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #32
marcusp said:
Its funny how most last season were saying vincelot was the player we had been missing for several years and his performancies were making him a contender for player of the season are now saying he was crap and average. If we had the choice im sure he would get in our team now and improve it but as usual some on here and cet site seem to think they know best aka grendel.

Vincelot showed passion and agression in our midfield which we lack now. He only slumped when the rest of team did so going on grendels comments we should have got rid of them all as they were shit
Click to expand...

He was awful after christmas. I remember posting on here after the Barnsley away game about how bad he was.
 
D

Deleted member 2477

Guest
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #33
So were murphy, armstrong and others. His dip in form started when the rest of the team did
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #34
I rated him. I would have kept him. Mowbray obviously didn't rate him and hasn't kept him.

Lovely beard though.

What I will say though, I defended Mowbrays decision at the time and still just about do. But the longer the shitshow of results carries on the less inclined I'll be to do that.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and robbiethemole

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 26, 2016
  • #35
hill83 said:
I rated him. I would have kept him. Mowbray obviously didn't rate him and hasn't kept him.

Lovely beard though.

What I will say though, I defended Mowbrays decision at the time and still just about do. But the longer the shitshow of results carries on the less inclined I'll be to do that.
Click to expand...
I liked him. He was a different player though in the new year as Fernando said.

It was like having two different players. First half of the season he was my favourite player. Second half he became a liability.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?