Grendel
Well-Known Member
Is Roger still lurking?
You said they were now working closely with them. Come on Pete, surely you can see what people are saying?
To be fair, the website just looks like somebody selling advertising packages.
Course he is.Is Roger still lurking?
I don’t think grace is a puppetYou said they were now working closely with them. Come on Pete, surely you can see what people are saying?
To be fair, the website just looks like somebody selling advertising packages.
Yes he was at the agmIs Roger still lurking?
He was at the agm. I think they think he gives ccfc a voice nationally I’m not so sure at allNew board members you say - have they cut ties with Mr Ellis yet?
He was at the agm. I think they think he gives ccfc a voice nationally I’m not so sure at all
Yep and still on the national committee linked with ccfcThat’s nonsense. He’s a disgraced councillor
Yep and still on the national committee linked with ccfc
That’s nonsense. He’s a disgraced councillor
Well I put deals of the agm and I was one of two on the call out of 2500 who weren’t board membersI still feel the only way forward for the sky blue trust and the board to regain any/some credibility is now that they have their website finally working with which they can speak to people is to call an emergency AGM and to have fresh elections.
How can elections/board members for this year have any credibility when the website was down for an awfully long period of time?
You can’t I don’t think. It needs to be taken over from withinEvery fucking time the trust is bought up people say "give them time to adjust" and they do fuck all.
Disband it and start again.
All elected unopposed and there are gaps on the board. Dave Eyles standing down at the end of this year but happy still to be involved as a board memberOut of the interest, who actually elected the current Trust board and on what mandate?
When did they self-appoint themselves?All elevated unopposed and there are gaps on the board. Dave Eyles standing down at the end of this year but happy still to be involved as a board member
Well I put deals of the agm and I was one of two on the call out of 2500 who weren’t board members
They were Co opted and then elected unopposed at the agm. And there are still spaces for trust members to put themselves forwardWhen did they self-appoint themselves?
Nope it was the one question I asked. They really should be able to represent the fan base in some way. They really aren’t at presentNot many active members then Pete?
What do you think they are failing to do?
If they don't comply....which clearly they don't...surely they can be closed down/disassociated/binned off or whatever?
What do you think they are failing to do?
As I say I am not defending them they can do that themselves.For starters, if they're maintaining a membership database....then my names rumplestiltskin...
..and if you don't believe me, check the database.
.....pretty sure their agm/account timings etc have been iffy....
Don't really matter tbh.
Bottom line is they're toxic and beyond repair...
If they really loved the club, they'd dissolve and start again in an inclusive manner.....
As I say I am not defending them they can do that themselves.
They’ve done a lot of work on the membership list
If you want to use a fake name ok
Agm are yearly and email was sent to all members on their list and I posted it on here. Accounts are all up to date
I don’t buy the toxic shit
The trust can’t just dissolve the sky blues trust is the sky blues trust. Like I say if we want it to work we probably need to make it work
Every fucking time the trust is bought up people say "give them time to adjust" and they do fuck all.
Disband it and start again.
Or how this board views the trust rather than the public. I think some posters would be surprised and I don’t think it would be meMaybe a vote is needed on here about the toxicity of the trust.
With 0 as doing well, 5 as being as normal, and 10 as being as toxic.
This way you can guage the mood of this place in relation to how the public perceives the trust.
I know how hard is this to understand???You can’t. That’s the problem.
I know how hard is this to understand???
Not all my friendI just join in these threads for the lols now mate. Trust bad. People angry. Virtue signalling everywhere. No one wants to actually do anything though. They’d like to just read one day the people doing things have decided to stop and do what the people on here want exactly, with no effort from the people on here.
This is literally all small time democracy: run by the people who turn up. And this is why people don’t get listened to because ultimately they don’t want to turn up, they just want it to work in their interests with no effort. Be it the trust, the PTA, the local council, whatever.
I’m no better by the way. But I’m not frothing about it. I’m very open that I can’t be arsed and as such forfeit my right to moan about those that can.
As I say I am not defending them they can do that themselves.
They’ve done a lot of work on the membership list
If you want to use a fake name ok
Agm are yearly and email was sent to all members on their list and I posted it on here. Accounts are all up to date
I don’t buy the toxic shit
The trust can’t just dissolve the sky blues trust is the sky blues trust. Like I say if we want it to work we probably need to make it work
So are you saying that you can’t ever be ok with an organisation because of the activities of individuals and if so, is that forever?Not toxic ? They picked sides and worked to undermine the club. And no. ‘We’ don’t need to make it work. They need to show they’re fit to represent the fanbase… which has never appeared to be the intention, so why start now?
They’ve rendered themselves totally untrustworthy. It’s all on them to change not for us to ‘make it work’.
I just join in these threads for the lols now mate. Trust bad. People angry. Virtue signalling everywhere. No one wants to actually do anything though. They’d like to just read one day the people doing things have decided to stop and do what the people on here want exactly, with no effort from the people on here.
This is literally all small time democracy: run by the people who turn up. And this is why people don’t get listened to because ultimately they don’t want to turn up, they just want it to work in their interests with no effort. Be it the trust, the PTA, the local council, whatever.
I’m no better by the way. But I’m not frothing about it. I’m very open that I can’t be arsed and as such forfeit my right to moan about those that can.
So are you saying that you can’t ever be ok with an organisation because of the activities of individuals and if so, is that forever?
I think the fan base needs a voice and the supporters forum does that ok but a performing representative trust would be excellent. Shmmee is correct most want others to do the work for them
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?