i said exactly that a couple of weeks ago when they were back in the directors box. i thought they had been banned from their for a bit, then all of a sudden talk of new investors and they're back on the scene!!!!!
This pops up every now and again.
I think investors not holding more than 5% shares in any company have a right to stay annonymous, and I believe the rules comes from the financial world and has been adopted by the football world. To change this you would need to change the financial regulations - probably worldwide.
If you own more than 5% there will be a public accessible record.
Not quite so: the MP who asked questions in Parliament about SISU thinks that the "less than 5%" rule is grossly inappropriate to football. It isn't like most other businesses-every single supporter is a stakeholder. They deserve transparency.
Not quite so: the MP who asked questions in Parliament about SISU thinks that the "less than 5%" rule is grossly inappropriate to football. It isn't like most other businesses-every single supporter is a stakeholder. They deserve transparency.
It may be we think we 'deserve' to know who the investors are, but why should it be more inappropriate in football as to other businesses.
Did you know that many unions place money within the 5% rule in companies like BAE or Lockheed Martin who manufacture landmines?
They do so to maximize the profit of their members money, but in reality you and me are funding the killing of thousands non-combatants including children.