Even if Sisu wanted to replace Thorn they probably are very reluctant to do so. For 1 thing it may actually be agreed as part of negotiations that they won't sack him allowing Hoffman to choose the timing of any managerial change if he takes over. Secondly Sisu probably don't want the cost of replacing him. There only option maybe an internal caretaker appointment and they may feel that this would simply undermine player confidence in the club and the manager appointed.
Realistically we should just get behind Thorn and hope he pulls off an escape. Next season is next season.
So If Hoffman does take over and replaces Thorn, will Thorn then become crap in the eyes of the "Anti-Sisu, Pro-Thorn" camp, or will there be immediate protests against the new regime?
So If Hoffman does take over and replaces Thorn, will Thorn then become crap in the eyes of the "Anti-Sisu, Pro-Thorn" camp, or will there be immediate protests against the new regime?
Paul Tisdale would be an excellent appointment. I always wanted us to get Howe and Hill (Burnley and Barnsley) whilst they were at their previous clubs.
What I don't understand is the thought process of alot of fans that seem to think replacing Thorn will automatically ensure survival.
With the situation the club is in, who could we realistically attract to the job?
The posters headline is preposterous!
They certainly can't afford a good manager that's why we don't have one.
Didn't really answer the question. No change there then SISU fanboy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?