Why should I pay for her to pay. She can pay for her crimes in the shithole she left for.Why shouldn’t she pay for her crimes. We ask other criminals to be returned
Im not Christian so I don't know what your talking about.It’s a perverse decision based on vengeance. Long live Great Britain paragon of the Christian virtues of you made your bed now lie in it. Which part of Christian doctrine is that one I wonder??
The Home Secretary has denied her entrance to the UK and revoked her British Citizenship.
Glad somebody had the balls to do the right thing and not roll over like we always have done in the past.
It would of been criminal if she had of been let back into the country after we refused entry to Asia Bibi.
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
I'll admit to doing some stupid things as a teenager but running off to another country to join a terror organisation wasn't one of them.People saying she was only 15 and nieve but I knew at 15 what's right and wrong anyway well done home secretary
It’s a perverse decision based on vengeance. Long live Great Britain paragon of the Christian virtues of you made your bed now lie in it. Which part of Christian doctrine is that one I wonder??
People saying she was only 15 and nieve but I knew at 15 what's right and wrong anyway well done home secretary
Crack open a Thatchers cider me thinks!!!
Why shouldn’t she pay for her crimes. We ask other criminals to be returned
Has to be the rule of law surely. We don’t use mob rule or do we?What would you have recommended / liked to have seen done Pete?
Genuine question, I'm interested to hear an alternative view?
Did she commit her crimes here? No. So why should we bring someone into the UK to punish them when they are a danger to the UK public?Why shouldn’t she pay for her crimes. We ask other criminals to be returned
Clint as i've quoted before....She went to syria at the age of 15 because she saw vids on youtube of her fellow mad islam nutters beheading westerners ......She's a sick bastard full stop.I could go with the naive 15 year old argument if at 19 she'd shown a bit of remorse and hadn't said seeing a severed head in a bin hadn't fazed her.
She should face justice why are we even letting her off!She has been convicted of a crime what are you on about?
OMG........Has to be the rule of law surely. We don’t use mob rule or do we?
She is a victim at 15 although responsible criminally for her actions of course as the age of criminality is 12 in the U.K. apart from when we decide its 10 for the Bulger pair.
At 19 and a British citizen she has seen things we wouldn’t ever see and I’m happy they have dehumanised her to say things that are just awful.
She should be allowed back in the U.K. to face the law. I’m almost ok with not risking anything to help her back but if the times and Sky can interview her it doesn’t seem as if it’s too dangerous to be there
As I said 5 minutes ago what crime did she commit in the UK?She should face justice why are we even letting her off!
We would be letting her off allowing her back in the UK you mad man........Honestly i despair.......She should face justice why are we even letting her off!
Has to be the rule of law surely. We don’t use mob rule or do we?
She is a victim at 15 although responsible criminally for her actions of course as the age of criminality is 12 in the U.K. apart from when we decide its 10 for the Bulger pair.
At 19 and a British citizen she has seen things we wouldn’t ever see and I’m happy they have dehumanised her to say things that are just awful.
She should be allowed back in the U.K. to face the law. I’m almost ok with not risking anything to help her back but if the times and Sky can interview her it doesn’t seem as if it’s too dangerous to be there
Would think treasonDid she commit her crimes here? No. So why should we bring someone into the UK to punish them when they are a danger to the UK public?
She still thinks it is OK for women and children to be raped and murdered. Does anyone have an excuse for this?
I’ve been advised by a friend who is a lawyer that children of immigrants whose parents came rather than were born in this country have no automatic right to citizenship so may not win an appeal. That would be a tough life lessonThing is Pete if she has dual citizenship then it is legal to revoke her British citezenship.
If she hasn't then I'm sure she'll win her appeal. I don't think the rule of law will have been compromised and like you I think that is the way it should be.
Really?? So you’d prefer she doesn’t face justiceWe would be letting her off allowing her back in the UK you mad man........Honestly i despair.......
I’ve been advised by a friend who is a lawyer that children of immigrants whose parents came rather than were born in this country have no automatic right to citizenship so may not win an appeal. That would be a tough life lesson
No literally no one has an excuse for itDid she commit her crimes here? No. So why should we bring someone into the UK to punish them when they are a danger to the UK public?
She still thinks it is OK for women and children to be raped and murdered. Does anyone have an excuse for this?
He’s suggesting so yepSo that would still mean the government had acted lawfully??
She's living in a refugee camp, with a baby who's father is dead and no family around her.Really?? So you’d prefer she doesn’t face justice
We ask for people to be returned if they have committed a crime in the UK and then fled the country.Why shouldn’t she pay for her crimes. We ask other criminals to be returned
I’ve been advised by a friend who is a lawyer that children of immigrants whose parents came rather than were born in this country have no automatic right to citizenship so may not win an appeal. That would be a tough life lesson
Does that just apply to their children who weren't born here? I thought being born in a country gave automatic citizenship? Otherwise that could potentially leave lots of people stateless, which is also illegal under international law I thought? Which takes precedence?
Surely she’s a citizen of the caliphate or Islamic state.
I wouldn’t start celebrating just yet. This seems to have been done on the premise that she qualifies for dual nationality with Bangladesh. If Bangladesh refuses her citizenship she’ll revert back to the only citizenship she’s ever had. British. This will be the premise of her appeal. Which the Home Secretary has already confirmed she’s entitled to. All cases were this has been successfully done before the individual has already had dual nationality as far as I can see.
How do you guarantee that?As I said 5 minutes ago what crime did she commit in the UK?
Leave her where she is to rot.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?