Mick Scoop
Member
Sell to a hedge fund? No signature from me!
They will if the the Arena starts to cost Taxpayers and becomes a liability. Which based on the last accounts filed by ACL would have put that situation dangerously close.
Sell to a hedge fund? No signature from me!
OK! Great! Northampton for 5 years it is then!
A lot has changed since the last accounts filed by ACL. Calm down with the obsession
Let's hope the likes of MMM, VofR, Astute, Simple_Simon, Thaiskyblue, Valiant and the bloke who can't quote posts properly, sign up to this too.......
none with the truth.Which questions have Sisu answered?
Look, it's another angle of attack for us fans to get behind. It really isn't about SISU this or ACL that. SISU have had pressure applied and it has resorted in them putting some answers out into the public domain. Whether you believe them is irrelevant at this stage. CCC/ACL haven't had any pressure applied and haven't put much out about their plans and thoughts. It really is time for them to do so. And when they do we'll have both sides answers and ideas to put together.
This campaign should be given as much support as possible. To not support it, is tantramount to supporting CCC over your club, IMO.
It's like like challenging Stevie Wonder to a game of darts....
This is true, their order book is now even more empty than it was before. Never has the Jag Hall been so underused.
Why should I? What if I don't agree with much of it? Let me give you an example:
'We call on the council to explain to fans and city taxpayers what strategy it now has, if any, for returning the Sky Blues to the Ricoh Arena as soon as possible'
How can they? They have clear advice in the public domain that they've been instructed not to comment on all things pertaining to the Arena until this facial Judicial Review is over. How can they therefore 'explain'? Why don't these folk campaign to pressurise SISU to drop their pantomime of a JR so that there can be a proper debate?
Otherwise, it's like like challenging Stevie Wonder to a game of darts....
How can they? They have clear advice in the public domain that they've been instructed not to comment on all things pertaining to the Arena until this facial Judicial Review is over. How can they therefore 'explain'? Why don't these folk campaign to pressurise SISU to drop their pantomime of a JR so that there can be a proper debate?
The way some of you lot go on makes me wonder if you actually enjoy this mess, it gives you something to whinge and moan about.
Nonsense. If the the legal constraints imposed by the ongoing JR are as tight as you say they are, we'd wouldn't have heard anything from SISU either.
There is much the council could say without jeopardizing the outcome of the JR, and to say otherwise is just ludicrous. The only thing we've heard from them recently was that response to the equally farcical legal action against NTFC.
Nonsense. If the the legal constraints imposed by the ongoing JR are as tight as you say they are, we'd wouldn't have heard anything from SISU either.
There is much the council could say without jeopardizing the outcome of the JR, and to say otherwise is just ludicrous. The only thing we've heard from them recently was that response to the equally farcical legal action against NTFC.
Im assuming you have access to the order book?
Book me in for October 26th I need to arrange a game of darts ...........
The way some of you lot go on makes me wonder if you actually enjoy this mess, it gives you something to whinge and moan about. Wtf is wrong with applying a bit of pressure to the other side. As for "sell to a hedge fund, no signature from me". You obviously
enjoy us playing in Northampton Mick, maybe you're a secret scab.
No. CCC have clearly stated that it is their policy, until the JR is complete not to comment for fear of being found in contempt. It's not nonsense. It's out there and a matter for public record.
I was outside Cov Station on Wednesday, quite ironically there was a 'Vacuum Convention' at the Ricoh, I saw a shuttle bus for it outside.
Unless I've missed reading it, what happens when it get's to 100?
So once the JR is kicked out for a second time, do you expect the Council to -
'explain to fans and city taxpayers what strategy it now has, if any, for returning the Sky Blues to the Ricoh Arena as soon as possible'
Im assuming you have access to the order book?
Book me in for October 26th I need to arrange a game of darts ...........
Why would I need access to their order book? They have an events diary available for all to see. What an odd thing to say.
It spontaneously combusts
No. Because SISU will appeal again.
Do you expect SISU to explain why they are spending so much time on appealing the JR rather than finding us a site for a new stadium, or getting us back to Coventry?
Why would I need access to their order book? They have an events diary available for all to see. What an odd thing to say.
Why should I? What if I don't agree with much of it? Let me give you an example:
'We call on the council to explain to fans and city taxpayers what strategy it now has, if any, for returning the Sky Blues to the Ricoh Arena as soon as possible'
How can they? They have clear advice in the public domain that they've been instructed not to comment on all things pertaining to the Arena until this facial Judicial Review is over. How can they therefore 'explain'? Why don't these folk campaign to pressurise SISU to drop their pantomime of a JR so that there can be a proper debate?
Otherwise, it's like like challenging Stevie Wonder to a game of darts....
I can't remember seeing such a statement, can you point us in the direction of it?
Remembering that the leader of the council embarrassingly offered to meet JS 'woman to woman' to discuss the situation? Does that not count as comment for fear of being found in contempt?
So you're happy with the Council to stay completely silent?
It amounts to the same thing. Yes, I was being mischievous, but you have said yourself that CCFC returning to Coventry is of secondary concern to you. I think being in Northampton is hugely damaging to CCFC, but evidently you have more important things to worry about, like getting one over those nasty little hedge-funders.
It was a joke regarding this .......
Calm yourself, I wasn't accusing you of anything. Trying to lighten the mood. Obviously people are a little bit edgy .......
They did answer questions, you just didn't like the answers. To pretend you don't know the difference is flagrant WUMing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?