Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

SCG Teleconference with Tim Fisher tonight (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter kingharvest
  • Start date Feb 19, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 9
Next
First Prev 4 of 9 Next Last

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #106
grego_gee said:
ahem...
Doncaster Rovers Chairman John Ryan was so concerned by the plight of the Sky Blues and their current rent position that he approached the club's Directors in the Boardroom before Coventry's recent away match at the Keepmoat Stadium with an offer of moral support a well as full details of the Rovers' new 99 year lease agreed with Doncaster Council, which is dramatically different from the £1 million a year rent Doncaster Rovers paid in the Championship. (Rates were not charged to the club). Both clubs were relegated from the Championship last season.

Why do we get charged rates at all?
it's like being in the boxing ring with Doncaster with one arm tied behind our back!
If Doncaster council don't charge rates to their FC why do Coventry?

imp:
Click to expand...

got a feeling it has something to do with the stadium being classed as being used as a community stadium ...... Doncaster base all their community work there I believe. But that is a educated best guess ....... thats the basis sports clubs I deal with make the rates claim
 
P

PWKH

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #107
lordsummerisle said:
PWKH,

Could you clear up something concerning your involvement in the stadium from it's early days?

MFDoom brought up the fact that there was a stadium company, pre-ACL Football Investors Ltd which you were a director of, with Robinson, McGinnity,Hover and Derek Higgs also as directors.

What was the ownership structure and purpose of this?

Were the rent agreements and costs arranged through this company?

Does it still have any involvement at all?

I notice that it is still in place with you as the sole director now?

https://www.duedil.com/company/04315455/football-investors-limited/people
Click to expand...

Football Investors Ltd was owned by CCFC and had as its Directors Robinson, McGinnity, Higgs and Hover. In 2003 CCFC sold FIL to the Higgs Charity. The CCFC Directors resigned and I was appointed. FIL is a non-trading company. It only exists to hold shares in ACL. The Charity appointed Higgs and McGinnity to be Directors of ACL. I was appointed as an alternate director as was Hover. When McGinnity resigned ( at the same time he resigned as CCFC Chairman) the Charity just replaced him with me . When Sir Derek died the Charity appointed another Director to ACL: a former chief executive of CCFC, Stuart Rolt. When he resigned Paul Harris was appointed Director of ACL and subsequently a Trustee of the Charity.

All Agreements etc are between ACL and CCFC.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #108
I don't think that would work really with fans being there. It would be chaos.

rupert_bear said:
Also Mr Fisher asks for mediation, fair enough, so i take it he wouldn't be against an open debate with the other parties attending, forum style perhaps on radio or another venue where the general public can attend and ask questions.
Click to expand...
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #109
ashbyjan said:
Grendel - neither KH or me are calling Tim Fisher a liar, all KH has done is report what was said and I have confirmed it. Please do not try and twist what KH has reported in good faith.
Click to expand...

Thats exactly how i see it Jan and its up to us to make our own conclusions from the gathered information from trusted sources !!!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #110
ashbyjan said:
Grendel - neither KH or me are calling Tim Fisher a liar, all KH has done is report what was said and I have confirmed it. Please do not try and twist what KH has reported in good faith.
Click to expand...

I know you're not. This is all informative stuff. I was referring to sky blue John who is and suggesting that is not the most sensible course of action.
 
P

PWKH

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #111
I am sorry but...
There was either a veto or there was not. It is black and white. There was no veto and Sisu have made no contact since writing and signing the heads of terms in June. I think that has to be my last word on the subject as there is nothing that can usefully be added.
 
A

Ashdown1

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #112
torchomatic said:
Of course. Everyone has. Couldn't agree more. This is why some sort of arbitration would probably be a good thing.
Click to expand...

I'd agree with arbitration, get it all in the open and find out who is really playing games, who wants the club to profit from their own footfall and input into the arena and what are the long term goals from both the hedge fund and the council. I suspect both have bullshitted and both would not be completely open and honest though.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #113
grego_gee said:
ahem...
Doncaster Rovers Chairman John Ryan was so concerned by the plight of the Sky Blues and their current rent position that he approached the club's Directors in the Boardroom before Coventry's recent away match at the Keepmoat Stadium with an offer of moral support a well as full details of the Rovers' new 99 year lease agreed with Doncaster Council, which is dramatically different from the £1 million a year rent Doncaster Rovers paid in the Championship. (Rates were not charged to the club). Both clubs were relegated from the Championship last season.

Why do we get charged rates at all?
it's like being in the boxing ring with Doncaster with one arm tied behind our back!
If Doncaster council don't charge rates to their FC why do Coventry?

imp:
Click to expand...

That is their contract, and ours is ours.

If our owners want to change that, they need to do so via the vehicle of lawful, honest and open negotiation.

They do not appear to be evidencing all of the above, and in order to get the best deal possible, and seemingly using OUR football club as prime bargaining chip. That's what I hate. Surely you can see that?!?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #114
sky blue john said:
Thats exactly how i see it Jan and its up to us to make our own conclusions from the gathered information from trusted sources !!!
Click to expand...

I am sure fishers libel lawyer has already made his mind up about your previous post.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #115
Can we be clear what we are asking for ......

TF wants mediation ....... which could be a long drawn out process that attempts to find a compromise

arbitration is a process where someone independent looks at the available info, arguments and decides the solution ........ TF is not suggesting this
 
A

Ashdown1

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #116
oldskyblue58 said:
Can we be clear what we are asking for ......

TF wants mediation ....... which could be a long drawn out process that attempts to find a compromise

arbitration is a process where someone independent looks at the available info, arguments and decides the solution ........ TF is not suggesting this
Click to expand...

Which would again suggest that the real SISU goals are to continue to avoid payment altogether and starve ACL of funds?
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #117
Grendel said:
I am sure fishers libel lawyer has already made his mind up about your previous post.
Click to expand...

The very same lawyer would ahve to set about proving whether it was a lie or not; and I very much suggest that such a course of action might now be necessary in any case
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #118
Problem is that even if both sides do agree to mediation or arbitration then that would more than likely still be conducted behind closed doors and we would be no the wiser. A mediator would only be a referee and both sides can continue to argue, spin and bullshit to their hearts content but an agreement has to be reached by the two parties not the mediator. An arbitrator would listen to the arguments from both sides and come up with a "judgement" that both sides would "have" to abide by.

In all honesty cannot see any real benefit to mediation as it could still roll on and on for ever nor could I see either side agreeing to arbitration as both would not wish to relinquish control of the outcome. Bet they wouldn't even agree who would pay for the mediator/arbitrator or would spend a year arguing over who it should be.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #119
oldskyblue58 said:
Can we be clear what we are asking for ......

TF wants mediation ....... which could be a long drawn out process that attempts to find a compromise

arbitration is a process where someone independent looks at the available info, arguments and decides the solution ........ TF is not suggesting this
Click to expand...

Correct, and as I pointed out the other day, such a lengthy process will do nothing more than defer agreement, and until such time, the arrears accrue at the higher rental rate - thereby increasing the magnitude of one of the negotiation's largest stumbling blocks.

Hence my question with regards Fisher clarifying exactly the first time they have suggested this avenue
 

CJparker

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #120
ACL should just end the argument - proceed to a winding up petition, then we'll see the whites of SISU's eyes. Hopefully this risky game will end with CCFC surviving in non-SISU hands and with SISU out of our lives for good.
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #121
Last night Tim Fisher did state he had asked ACL for mediation but only during a radio broadcast and on the clubs website, no direct request made to ACL with terms of reference or anything like that. I believe when Linnell pressed him on the radio on Saturday about abiding by any third party decision he avoided giving an answer - maybe someone could confirm that.
 

grego_gee

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #122
oldskyblue58 said:
got a feeling it has something to do with the stadium being classed as being used as a community stadium ...... Doncaster base all their community work there I believe. But that is a educated best guess ....... thats the basis sports clubs I deal with make the rates claim
Click to expand...

TY OSB, Is there a big difference between the contribution that Doncaster FC and CCFC make to the community? Surely the difference is in the sentiment coming from DCC and CCC. Doncaster CC must have wanted to support DFC and have taken very significant steps to improve the arrangement for the club! rates is just one.
a point by point comparison of the Doncaster arrangement would leave us with several arms tied behind the back!

http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-261212-559871.aspx



imp:
 

skyblueman

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #123
To my mind Tim Fisher has zero credibility - he should just go, he's an embarassment
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #124
grego_gee said:
TY OSB, Is there a big difference between the contribution that Doncaster FC and CCFC make to the community? Surely the difference is in the sentiment coming from DCC and CCC. Doncaster CC must have wanted to support DFC and have taken very significant steps to improve the arrangement for the club! rates is just one.
a point by point comparison of the Doncaster arrangement would leave us with several arms tied behind the back!

http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/club-statement-261212-559871.aspx



imp:
Click to expand...

Think it is more to do with where that community project is delivered grego gee. I understand events etc are based round the Keepmoat but CCFC's is based around the Alan Higgs Centre and other places. So Doncaster can prove the stadium is used for the community, not so easy for CCFC to do that

In respect of Doncaster there are other articles that indicate that the council were not making money on the stadium and has passed a lot of cost on to the club. Like at CCFC the truth is probably somewhere of the middle of what is being said in the press
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #125
Or it could just be a process that attempts to find a compromise that both sides are happy with?

Ashdown1 said:
Which would again suggest that the real SISU goals are to continue to avoid payment altogether and starve ACL of funds?
Click to expand...
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #126
Hopefully? What if it doesn't end up nicely for Coventry City.

Job done?

CJparker said:
ACL should just end the argument - proceed to a winding up petition, then we'll see the whites of SISU's eyes. Hopefully this risky game will end with CCFC surviving in non-SISU hands and with SISU out of our lives for good.
Click to expand...
 

grego_gee

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #127
ashbyjan said:
Last night Tim Fisher did state he had asked ACL for mediation but only during a radio broadcast and on the clubs website, no direct request made to ACL with terms of reference or anything like that. I believe when Linnell pressed him on the radio on Saturday about abiding by any third party decision he avoided giving an answer - maybe someone could confirm that.
Click to expand...

Isn't that the difference between mediation and arbitration. my understanding (before reaching for the dictionary) is the former is not binding on either party the latter is.

imp:
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #128
Grendel said:
I am sure fishers libel lawyer has already made his mind up about your previous post.
Click to expand...

How can the man embaress himself and the support of yourself any more than he has already !!!
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #129
torchomatic said:
Or it could just be a process that attempts to find a compromise that both sides are happy with?
Click to expand...

I think this whole thing has become so acrimonious that when (please let that be soon) an agreement is finally reached I doubt either side will be happy
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #130
grego_gee said:
Isn't that the difference between mediation and arbitration. my understanding (before reaching for the dictionary) is the former is not binding on either party the latter is.

imp:
Click to expand...

Your right which is probably why he didn't wish to be drawn on it
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #131
ashbyjan said:
I think this whole thing has become so acrimonious that when (please let that be soon) an agreement is finally reached I doubt either side will be happy
Click to expand...

Ashbyjan, we all crave for an agreement, would you say this process would be worth it if an agreement favourable to CCFC is agreed?
 

skyblueman

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #132
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Ashbyjan, we all crave for an agreement, would you say this process would be worth it if an agreement favourable to CCFC is agreed?
Click to expand...

When this is finalised and surely it has to be before long I think Fisher will be asked by Sisu to fall on his sword so a new guy can come in and deal with ACL etc - so much bad feeling and miss-trust has been generated by this entire fiasco under Fisher that I can't see any other way forward for the club with him remaining at the helm
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #133
isnt it a question of degree of favourability SBT ........... the amount of rent in L1 seems to have been accepted by both sides ?

really all that mediation is, is a referee that tries to keep things civil. Are not all successful contract negotiations all about successful mediation (just no referee)
 

grego_gee

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #134
ashbyjan said:
Your right which is probably why he didn't wish to be drawn on it
Click to expand...

He is entitled to not be drawn on anything further than what he proposed! He proposed mediation why should he be drawn on arbitration? I don't see anything wrong with that!

imp:
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #135
skyblueman said:
When this is finalised and surely it has to be before long I think Fisher will be asked by Sisu to fall on his sword so a new guy can come in and deal with ACL etc - so much bad feeling and miss-trust has been generated by this entire fiasco under Fisher that I can't see any other way forward for the club with him remaining at the helm
Click to expand...

I don't think that is the case to be honest. I isn't just Fisher they have a problem with, it's also SISU.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #136
Well, with such differing accounts I think that the parties involved appear to be adversarial. Surely they ought to be agreeing upon a joint statement before any meeting closes and then maintaining that position at all costs - not embellishing, or disputing, or confirming or speculating - & certainly not slinging accusations in various directions?
Whilst I dispute no accounts from any party...I think it is currently a case of "MUD! Mud...glorious mud!"
 

grego_gee

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #137
oldskyblue58 said:
isnt it a question of degree of favourability SBT ........... the amount of rent in L1 seems to have been accepted by both sides ?

really all that mediation is, is a referee that tries to keep things civil. Are not all successful contract negotiations all about successful mediation (just no referee)
Click to expand...

Actually TF is doing more than seek mediation - he is suggesting a specific mediator with particular knowledge of football finances. Deloites? to help get over their specific problems that perhaps are difficult to get over to ACL or the Council.
Of course ACL could ignor this request and simply press on for their pound of flesh! but I hope they accept this and try to understand the problems better, after all its not binding on either side.

imp:
 
Last edited: Feb 20, 2013

Wrenstreetcarpark

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #138
"MUD! Mud...glorious mud!"
nothing quite like it for cooling the blood...

the mud doesn't seem to be working!
 
A

Ashdown1

New Member
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #139
I think things would all be a bit less bitter and more open to dialogue if SISU had at least paid what THEY consider to be a fair rent. The acrimony continues and the suspicion grows with their refusal to pay anything !
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Feb 20, 2013
  • #140
grego_gee said:
Actually TF is doing more than seek mediation - he is suggesting a specific mediator with particular knowledge of football finances. Deloites? to help get over their specific problems that perhaps are difficult to get over to ACL or the Council.
Of course ACL could ignor this request and simply press on for their pound of flesh! but I hope they accept this and try to understand the problems better, after all its not binding on either side.

imp:
Click to expand...

yes he is making that suggestion. Personally I would go for someone who has been entirely independent in all this. Deloittes, they have the expertise certainly but were involved in the negotiations involving Yorkshire bank and may well already have close links to both parties. They are not the only major firm of accountants that could do this though. I would perhaps approach someone like one of the football finance academics we have heard on CWR - they will have very good football finance knowledge but no link to the club

But there we have the first problem dont we, even if it is agreed to be done ......by who?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 9
Next
First Prev 4 of 9 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?