adding to army bike.....
a) If CSF/Wasps don't provide the information, what is the next step regarding trying to ensure the continuation of the Academy from next summer onwards ?
b) Has any progression been made regarding extending agreement at Ricoh
b) a new ground where we can access the revenues that they have talked about
c) where has the Maddison money gone ?
d) What do our owners care more about, court cases or the club ?
Obvious question is 'Why didn't you turn up to the last meeting?'On Wednesday there is an SCG meeting and hopefully it's one meeting CA will turn up to. Please let me know any questions you might want to ask him, I will try and get answers and post them back here. Please try and keep the relevant and ask able!
Obvious question is 'Why didn't you turn up to the last meeting?'
If the answer is one of distrust, then the second question has to be 'So why have you turned up to this one then?'
Yes that's a real sensible approach isn't it.
What was the one he missed then? Who was that with?Surely he could just say "because this isn't with Wasps and CSF!"?
lets hear 5 questions from you then grendal ?
What was the one he missed then? Who was that with. Get confused with the CSF and the SCG and IMF and the WWF.
What's the point.
No one will believe the answers anyway.
Isn't that the SCG?It was the one with CSF / Wasps I think wasn't it?
This one CSG is the fans group one.
What's the point.
No one will believe the answers anyway.
funny that
happy to comment on others, but not actually stump up your own
You question 5 was embarrassing.
Well they seem to do.You question 5 was embarrassing.
Maybe a better worded question would be 'Are the court cases deflecting attention away from Coventry City FC and the onfield issues?'adding to army bike.....
a) If CSF/Wasps don't provide the information, what is the next step regarding trying to ensure the continuation of the Academy from next summer onwards ?
b) Has any progression been made regarding extending agreement at Ricoh
b) a new ground where we can access the revenues that they have talked about
c) where has the Maddison money gone ?
d) What do our owners care more about, court cases or the club ?. If its the club, would they not consider dropping court cases to negotiate with the local stakeholders ?
I would think the the 2 most pertinent questions are:
1) what progress is being made on the academy? What exploration work have you done if the higgs is a no go? (I'd like to know what contingencies they have been pursuing)
2) has there been any discussions with wasps about re-engaging in Ricoh negotiations?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Well they seem to do.
I would also like to know where the Maddison money has gone.
And when the answer's no, what's the follow-up?Maybe a better worded question would be 'Are the court cases deflecting attention away from Coventry City FC and the onfield issues?'
I've no idea, it wasn't my question!And when the answer's no, what's the follow-up?
Maybe a better worded question would be 'Are the court cases deflecting attention away from Coventry City FC and the onfield issues?'
I don't know much about other clubs and what they do with fans meetings etc. Do they all go through everything with the fans with money in / money out etc? Genuine Question.Well they seem to do.
I would also like to know where the Maddison money has gone.
If CSF/Wasps don't provide the information he's requested, what is the next step regarding trying to ensure the continuation of the Academy from next summer onwards.
Has any progression been made regarding
a) extending agreement at Ricoh
b) proposed development/move to The Butts
And when the answer's no, what's the follow-up?
show the statements from the other parties who wont negotiate whilst court cases continue and ask the question again
I don't know much about other clubs and what they do with fans meetings etc. Do they all go through everything with the fans with money in / money out etc? Genuine Question.
I know everton did something once, but that's about it.
Anderson has already said the court action was not a reason for talks breakdown.
Can you actually find a statement where the other side emphatically state otherwise?
Can you actually find a statement where the other side emphatically state otherwise?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?