Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

SBT vote on the Boris Johnson withdrawal agreement..... (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter fernandopartridge
  • Start date Oct 18, 2019
Forums New posts

Do you vote in favour of the Withdrawal Agreement presented by Boris Johnson?

  • Aye

    Votes: 16 48.5%
  • No

    Votes: 17 51.5%

  • Total voters
    33
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #1
We need another EU thread obviously....
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #2
Can you summarise it?
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #3
I haven't seen any details of his deal yet.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #4
Plenty of information here: Press corner
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #5
skyblueindorset said:
I haven't seen any details of his deal yet.
Click to expand...

Do you remember the deal that May initially wanted to put to Parliament before the DUP kicked off and said that Northern Ireland couldn’t be different to the rest of the U.K.?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #6
skyblueindorset said:
I haven't seen any details of his deal yet.
Click to expand...
Its the same as May's deal but the backstop has been replaced with a border in the Irish Sea.

Apologies for linking to the Guardian but they've gone through the text to pick out the differences:
How much of Johnson's 'great new deal' is actually new?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #7
skybluetony176 said:
Do you remember the deal that May initially wanted to put to Parliament before the DUP kicked off and said that Northern Ireland couldn’t be different to the rest of the U.K.?
Click to expand...
Mad isn't it. Johnson is being lauded for going back to the deal first offered by the EU. One that he called "the worst of all worlds" and JRM called "cretinous". Even May said it was "a deal that no British prime minister could accept".
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849, oakey, Sick Boy and 2 others

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #8
I've never understood the mantra of "Taking control of our money" - we already control that. I would like a deal that doesn't include subservience to the ECJ, gets back our control of our fishing waters and stops the flow of EU directives to us. Does this deal include those?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #9
skyblueindorset said:
I've never understood the mantra of "Taking control of our money" - we already control that. I would like a deal that doesn't include subservience to the ECJ, gets back our control of our fishing waters and stops the flow of EU directives to us. Does this deal include those?
Click to expand...
Hasn’t Boris left our waters open to be traded off during trade negotiations?
It’s another one of those half assed arguments for leave anyway and for several reasons. The main ones being that the EU fishing quota system is based on well calculated numbers aimed at protecting fishing stocks and that’s unlikely to change to any great amount that’s going to equal a windfall for the fishing industry. The true problem for the U.K. fishing fleet is how the quota is dished out and that’s done by our own sovereign government who of their own free will have consistently for decades given the lion’s share to foreign owned and crewed trawlers that are conveniently registered in the U.K.. Yes we could take back control of our own waters but we may also lose access to waters that British fishermen rely on, for reference look up the so called scallop wars that took place last year IIRC. The short version is that British fishermen still had scallop quotas left and were fishing them where they were available ie French waters and French fishermen weren’t happy about it. Without that access though the British fishermen would have been sat at home with no income.

Which is probably why Boris has left it on the table. I wouldn’t be surprised if little to nothing changes with regards to access to fishing waters.
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #10
A historic mistake.
We will be poorer, weaker, more isolated and remain bitter and divided for a generation.
I don't respect the referendum result. Democracy is a process not a moment in time.
It is obvious to a majority of people in this country that we are taking a big and risky step. Many accept it. I do not.
I have no respect for politicians who will vote this through knowing it is not in the interests of the country or their constituents just because they want to 'get Brexit done'' or 'respect the will of the people'. Those are mindless, populist slogans. The objective reality is more important than bowing to pressure; being right is more important than being popular.
 
Reactions: Liquid Gold, stupot07, Sick Boy and 7 others

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #11
skyblueindorset said:
I've never understood the mantra of "Taking control of our money" - we already control that. I would like a deal that doesn't include subservience to the ECJ, gets back our control of our fishing waters and stops the flow of EU directives to us. Does this deal include those?
Click to expand...

why are people so concerned about fishing which will only every be a small percentage of our GDP but are quite happy to see manufacturing, and particularly just in time manufacturing supply chains trashed causing a lot of harm to a far bigger sector?
 
Reactions: stupot07, Deleted member 5849 and Sick Boy

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #12
skyblueindorset said:
I've never understood the mantra of "Taking control of our money" - we already control that. I would like a deal that doesn't include subservience to the ECJ, gets back our control of our fishing waters and stops the flow of EU directives to us. Does this deal include those?
Click to expand...

Think so, yes.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #13
clint van damme said:
why are people so concerned about fishing which will only every be a small percentage of our GDP but are quite happy to see manufacturing, and particularly just in time manufacturing supply chains trashed causing a lot of harm to a far bigger sector?
Click to expand...

Because they understand what it is. Unlike say biomedical engineering or data science.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #14
skyblueindorset said:
I've never understood the mantra of "Taking control of our money" - we already control that. I would like a deal that doesn't include subservience to the ECJ, gets back our control of our fishing waters and stops the flow of EU directives to us. Does this deal include those?
Click to expand...

It’s the notion that the EU is full of corruption, so we need to bring the corruption in house so the corrupt British people can have it instead.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #15
Ian1779 said:
It’s the notion that the EU is full of corruption, so we need to bring the corruption in house so the corrupt British people can have it instead.
Click to expand...

I think ‘taking back control of our money’ is more relating to the monies paid to the EU - £13bn paid year (gross), £9bn (net) in 2018. Second or third largest net contributor. Think it went up 20% this year from memory.

When you’re out of the monetary union which will have a variety of impacts on the countries within the euro, it’s not an insignificant sum.

You’re correct though Ian, from memory their have been comments in the past about corruption and the difficulty in signing off accounts EU accounts due to ‘errors’ (think things have improved in recent years though)
 
Reactions: Astute

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #16
Nick said:
Can you summarise it?
Click to expand...

“A disaster” - Jacob Rees Mogg
“Something so bad no Conservative PM would ever vote for it” - Boris Johnson
 
Reactions: stupot07, Deleted member 5849, Sick Boy and 1 other person

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #17
CCFCSteve said:
I think ‘taking back control of our money’ is more relating to the monies paid to the EU - £13bn paid year (gross), £9bn (net) in 2018. Second or third largest net contributor. Think it went up 20% this year from memory.

When you’re out of the monetary union which will have a variety of impacts on the countries within the euro, it’s not an insignificant sum.

You’re correct though Ian, from memory their have been comments in the past about corruption and the difficulty in signing off accounts EU accounts due to ‘errors’ (think things have improved in recent years though)
Click to expand...

That’s like saying my car is my biggest expense so I should get rid, ignoring how without it my earning options are severely limited.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #18
shmmeee said:
That’s like saying my car is my biggest expense so I should get rid, ignoring how without it my earning options are severely limited.
Click to expand...

You’ve got a Zoe haven’t you?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #19
skyblueindorset said:
I've never understood the mantra of "Taking control of our money" - we already control that. I would like a deal that doesn't include subservience to the ECJ, gets back our control of our fishing waters and stops the flow of EU directives to us. Does this deal include those?
Click to expand...

Pointless having fishing waters when you can't sell your goods tariff free into the biggest market for them.
 
Reactions: stupot07

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #20
fernandopartridge said:
Pointless having fishing waters when you can't sell your goods tariff free into the biggest market for them.
Click to expand...

yeah, I think most people have no idea how much of the fish caught in UK waters goes to other EU countries as it’s not to the taste of the average Brit.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #21
fernandopartridge said:
Pointless having fishing waters when you can't sell your goods tariff free into the biggest market for them.
Click to expand...
We’ll probably end up with something similar to Norway having traded of access to our waters. We’ll be able to sell whole fish just not processed fish. But then it’s not like processing fish is the largest part of our fishing industry. No, wait. It is.
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #22
shmmeee said:
That’s like saying my car is my biggest expense so I should get rid, ignoring how without it my earning options are severely limited.
Click to expand...

I was responding (factually) to what people mean by the ‘taking back control of our money comment’.

We obviously get benefits, however, if you’re asking, do I think we should have been second/third largest net contributor....probably not. We’ve always been on the periphery of the union.
 
Reactions: Astute

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #23
CCFCSteve said:
I was responding (factually) to what people mean by the ‘taking back control of our money comment’.

We obviously get benefits, however, if you’re asking, do I think we should have been second/third largest net contributor....probably not. We’ve always been on the periphery of the union.
Click to expand...

We've not always been on the periphery or certainly not by design. We've had as much representation as anybody else but we've had cunts like Farage and Co not really doing it for years. We somehow got a number of veto rights.

28 members and our voting weight is 13%, hardly peripheral
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849 and stupot07
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #24
fernandopartridge said:
We've not always been on the periphery or certainly not by design. We've had as much representation as anybody else but we've had cunts like Farage and Co not really doing it for years. We somehow got a number of veto rights.

28 members and our voting weight is 13%, hardly peripheral
Click to expand...

I meant as in we’re not in the Euro, not in schengen and don’t want closer union. Basically we’ve been the black sheep for a long while
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #25
CCFCSteve said:
I meant as in we’re not in the Euro, not in schengen and don’t want closer union. Basically we’ve been the black sheep for a long while
Click to expand...
Ireland has vetoed schengen also and Denmark also has the same veto as us on the Euro. We’re not the lone voice on these and other issues some would like to pretend.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • #26
skybluetony176 said:
Ireland has vetoed schengen also and Denmark also has the same veto as us on the Euro. We’re not the lone voice on these and other issues some would like to pretend.
Click to expand...
Aye, 19 of 28
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #27
Wrong thread
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #28
I don't have a Scooby doo.

Is it accept the Boris agreement or what? We would have to know what the alternative is. If it is Boris agreement or no deal then accept. If it is Boris agreement or just about everything else then it is just about everything else.

This has been the problem for the last few years. In, out or shake it all about. I have been in favour of shake it all about. I see problems with remaining. I see problems with leaving. The decision shouldn't have been left to the public. I would class myself as being better educated on the subject than the majority of the British public. Just like most on here would.

It is like saying that my dog is better than your dog. My dog is perfect for me. But would he be what you want?
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849
M

Macca

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #29
I think they continue the charade for about another year before revoking it. Makes it look like they tried. Honesty back at the time that they only meant for it to be an opinion poll would have saved an absolute fortune
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #30
Macca said:
I think they continue the charade for about another year before revoking it. Makes it look like they tried. Honesty back at the time that they only meant for it to be an opinion poll would have saved an absolute fortune
Click to expand...
It was never an opinion poll. But it was a result that wasn't expected.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #31
CCFCSteve said:
I meant as in we’re not in the Euro, not in schengen and don’t want closer union. Basically we’ve been the black sheep for a long while
Click to expand...

But those are choices we made, not been forced upon us. Plus we have a number of vetos which give/gave us a great deal of weight in decision making,
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #32
CCFCSteve said:
I meant as in we’re not in the Euro, not in schengen and don’t want closer union. Basically we’ve been the black sheep for a long while
Click to expand...

Not really as there are other countries that have their own currency and aren’t in Schengen.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #33
Macca said:
I think they continue the charade for about another year before revoking it. Makes it look like they tried. Honesty back at the time that they only meant for it to be an opinion poll would have saved an absolute fortune
Click to expand...
The massively stupid thing we did was invoke Article 50 straight away. I have no idea why all politicians hurtled towards this as a good idea! Would have been far better if we'd got some kind of coherent strategy before starting negotiations, that took on board a general consensus, and *then* seen what deal, if any, was out there for us.
 
Reactions: Astute, clint van damme and Sick Boy
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #34
Astute said:
The decision shouldn't have been left to the public.
Click to expand...
You deserve the like just for this It's such a complicated decision, it's just not possible to boil down to a simple yes/no. It's why we elect politicians, to debate the things endlessly and come up with the 'right' decision.

Well, in theory, at least(!)
 
Reactions: Astute and Sick Boy

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Oct 19, 2019
  • #35
What time is the vote scheduled for?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?