Not at the level yet maybe this is a long season games coming thick and fast players will pick up knocks if we want to stay up we will need to rotate players at the right times with adequate replacements...
Hence the McCallum loan
If he's not good enough to play for a team pushing for promotion from the championship, what do they do with him if they get promoted, they are then in the premier league with a player 18 months into a 3 yr deal who won't have played a competitive match for them, who only has experience at the level below, that's why i think it's strange. I'm happy he's here as Robins obviously sees him as an upgrade and that's good enough for me.Why's it strange.
He's not going to develop there whilst not being in first team squad.
He will get plenty of chamlionship game time with us. Obviously he's unlikely to be unavailable to play against Norwich.
His long throw is definately an asset. As well as his height.
I'm happy with this. Agree Mason must be moving on.
I'm happy he's here as Robins obviously sees him as an upgrade and that's good enough for me.
I highlighted Robins as his is the only opinion that really matters, if you're asking me i also think it's an upgrade.Surely it’s not just robins?. Who can’t see this as an upgrade on mason ?
If Robins is true to form, MacCullum will be on the bench. He has been very consistent in team selections and the way he treats players. Everybody knows the score that way. You earn your place. Only Kelly (and previously Doyle) have been treated in any way differently imho. This rule does not apply to goalies.Be interesting to see who we start at left back then
It's nothing to with how much better they both are than Mason.
The issue is they are both season long loans and lending clubs usually expect them to play.
They weren't on loan for the whole seasonDidn’t we have both on loan last season ?. Clearly both parent clubs are happy else they wouldn’t have made the same mistake twice ?
They weren't on loan for the whole season
I haven't thought or said anywhere that Robbins has given assurances.So, you think robins has assured wolves that Giles will play certain amount of games at left back this season in championship despite he didn’t play in league one and robins has now assured Norwich mcallum will play a certain amount of games at left back despite Giles starting well ?.
with injuries, a long season and the fact that Giles can play in midfield, I have no doubt both have their part to playthis season for us
No he wasn't. Nonsense like your Jacob Murphy opinions.He was the weakest defender in the back 5 last season and so I hope he doesn't just come in for Giles based on loan contract requirements. Giles has started very well.
It will be either Giles or McCallum and I don't see either of them playing in any other position.
Good to have a second LB, but just feels very strange.
We only want 1!!!! Bad enough hsving a bsckup goalkeeperEnglish left sided wingbacks/midfielders are at a premium - we have 2 of the best. What's the issue?
It's disgusting that's we've strengthened our squad with one of last season's stand out players. Footballers are only ever allowed to play in one position though, training and coaching is just really shuttle runs and loads of 6 a side matches! HahahaWe only want 1!!!! Bad enough hsving a bsckup goalkeeper
Worlds gone mad!
Giles is a LW turned LWB, not LB turned LWB. It’s not like Stokes and Haynes who were both LBs and neither had any really good attacking qualities.
Granted, I’m sure some of our posters ‘in the know’ reckoned Wolves loaned him to us because we play with WBs.
Giles probably good fit in somewhere higher up the pitch if we needed pace there.
Hmmmmm wasn’t there a young lad called Gareth Bale who started at Southampton as a LWB? Whatever happened to him?
No he wasn't. Nonsense like your Jacob Murphy opinions.
Our entire back 5 was solid as fuck especially down the stretch. Pivotal to promotion
And every year we hear about loan contract requirements but I don't know if there has ever been one?
This place wank over recruitment team but then questions everything loool
Bit harsh on Cardiff...He’s 20 and will be able to get a much better move than CCFC
I haven't thought or said anywhere that Robbins has given assurances.
I just doubt that a lending club has no influence or opinion on the development of their players
I am sure they will both play some games and will be better than Mason.
He didn't havw bad games. We only had idiots on here who didn't see he was playong brilliantly. Considering robins didnt change it up and we won league easily I would say those posters intelligence was proven to be what it isNothing to do with Jacob Murphy you retard.
He was the weakest in the back five last season. Certainly in the latter part. There were numerous calls for him to be dropped.
I'm not saying he isn't a good player, but he kept his place after many bad games. After that performance from Giles, are you really telling me you would pick McCallum in his place?
Ah Stokes of course!!
I'm not ruling it out as I think Friday showed Giles attacking ability. I just can't see us having both him and Sam in the starting line up together the way we seemingly want to play
Bizarre to me how anyone can be anything other than happy about this. Today our squad has been strengthened.
With the money we got from him, it’s enabled us to strengthen for this season and yet he was here at the end of last season and the start of this.
If he went elsewhere, this place would have gone in meltdown around “why didn’t we get first refusal”.
Also have to remember Sam kept Giles out of the team last year so when Giles has his inevitable bad game, we have very adequate cover.
I’d say dacosta was a bigger gamble than this.
The wing backs were a position of strength last season and continue to be this season.
Tbf I've often seen robins in the tree in our garden.The only thing certain from these shenanigans is that Robins really rates Sam.
Sam and Robins sitting in a tree...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?