Not sure that means he's letting it flow.Taking away the two penalty shouts, I thought the Ref today deserves some credit. He actually let the game flow and if I’m right in thinking he didn’t actually book anyone until the 84th minute.
He fell onto Wrights leg, it's a penalty.That one on wright wasn’t a penalty nick wright should of stayed on his feet but the one on Mason Clark was a definitely a pen surely the linesman if he’s in line see’s that 100% penalty.
It doesn't matter if it's accidental though if they wipe out the striker when they are about to shoot.Players faking they are stumbling or falling and it’s accidental and refs falling for it, both definite penalties today from players doing the same, they are impeding the plater by falling on them, accidental or not, it’s a penalty.
The letters from the FA keep stacking up and it genuinely feels like refs don’t want to give them us.
Taking away the two penalty shouts, I thought the Ref today deserves some credit. He actually let the game flow and if I’m right in thinking he didn’t actually book anyone until the 84th minute.
Spot on got most things right and was part of a great game.
Too much navel gazing around refs and decisions. Play to the whistle, play in.
No five minute delays for VAR pondering. A proper football match today.
Apart from 2 penalties, missed bookings etc.
Missing the ball go out of play a couple of times.
Not sure that means he's letting it flow.
They should have had a booking for a very late challenge on torp and mve getting hit in the face
What red card decision?Also he gave us very cheap free kicks when they were attacking and Dasilva should have had a red card which would have totally changed the game
What red card decision?
What red card decision?
Didn't see it, don't criticize refs in future.
Centre line.where do you sit out of interest?
?Didn't see it, don't criticize refs in future.
The Rusworth poor throw out to him and he slid in with the other player. The interesting point is where I sit a load of fans were screaming to send the other guy off - “Lino your a Leicester c**t” was a frequent theme.
It could easily have been interpreted the other way.
The biggest joke decision was giving us a foul when Ayeu beat Kitching and it would have been 3 on 1. He fell down as he’d lost position and the ref bought it.
Missed what? Are you always This odd?Missed out You missed .
You are allowed to have (part of) feet over the line, as long as part of both feet are on or behind the line.Something that the ref and linos missed today were the constant foul throws from their left back, Thomas. His foot was over the line every time he took a long throw.
Compared to missed penalties it's nothing, but it helps set the tone for poor officiating.
Yeah when there's no jeopardy.Taking away the two penalty shouts, I thought the Ref today deserves some credit. He actually let the game flow and if I’m right in thinking he didn’t actually book anyone until the 84th minute.
Something that the ref and linos missed today were the constant foul throws from their left back, Thomas. His foot was over the line every time he took a long throw.
Compared to missed penalties it's nothing, but it helps set the tone
He did a mistimed challenge on James and his studs went onto his ankle or shin wiping him out. I have seen reds given for that. James took a while to get up. Near the end. JDS got a yellow. His 5th of the season plus one red now. Don't know how that tots up for suspensions. I know 10 yellows is two matches.What red card decision?
No part of the foot can be over the lineYou are allowed to have (part of) feet over the line, as long as part of both feet are on or behind the line.
Never a red.He did a mistimed challenge on James and his studs went onto his ankle or shin wiping him out. I have seen reds given for that. James took a while to get up. Near the end. JDS got a yellow. His 5th of the season plus one red now. Don't know how that tots up for suspensions. I know 10 yellows is two matches.
WrongNo part of the foot can be over the line
As long as not fully over line u can bro. Below is ss from latest Laws of the gameNo part of the foot can be over the line
Accepted. I’m obviously out of date.As long as not fully over line u can bro. Below is ss from latest Laws of the game
Only just September updateAccepted. I’m obviously out of date.
Having watched both penalty claims again I didn't think they were pens just my opinion.Only just September update
The second one looked nailed on one why didn’t you think it was a pen?Having watched both penalty claims again I didn't think they were pens just my opinion.
Totally agree with this. It's like they give the defender the benefit of the doubt but reality is they made contact, didn't get the ball and took the player down.The tactic for defenders when beaten now & the wrong side, just fall into the attackers legs. As they've not used their feet to trip them, the Refs buy it as just a clumsy & off balance coming together but in reality, it's a penalty.
Yeah, exactly this . They are falling onto the attackers legs, making it look like a complete accidental tangle of legs.The tactic for defenders when beaten now & the wrong side, just fall into the attackers legs. As they've not used their feet to trip them, the Refs buy it as just a clumsy & off balance coming together but in reality, it's a penalty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?