who would you say has more composure and a better eye for goal?Shipley for O'Hare? Clear wumming.
Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
If Kane and O'Hare play the same amount if minutes. Kane will get more goals and assists.O'hare had a day off along with a good few more but O'hare has absolutely ran his bollocks off for us this season and looks knackered, he might not score the amount of goals we want him too but neither does Gus, Sheaf Kelly Allen etc etc
If Kane and O'Hare play the same amount if minutes. Kane will get more goals and assists.
The right back.
But we can't mention it from a number 10?Ben Sheaf with 0 goals and 1 assist is poor as well.
Granted he plays deeper, but we need the likes of him to add goals or creativity.
As does Kane then.O hare has more assists than Ronaldo
Ben Sheaf with 0 goals and 1 assist is poor as well.
Granted he plays deeper, but we need the likes of him to add goals or creativity.
But we can't mention it from a number 10?
You just compared O'Hare to sheaf because he's your boo boy.I've criticised O'Hare today.
Why does every conversation about Sheaf constantly result in comparisons to O'Hare and Hamer.
Sheaf was fine today. At least he dares to shoot sometimes
So when will his form start?Yeah he was but we need him to contribute with goal participation or we end up relying on O'Hare which clearly isn't working when he's off form.
Kelly, Sheaf and Dabo have 3 assist and 0 goals between them.
You just compared O'Hare to sheaf because he's your boo boy.
So when will his form start?
Are you allowed to question he and Kelly's lack of goal participation?
As I've said time after time, O'Hare isn't playing well. Therefore we have to look elsewhere for creativity and unfortunately the rest of the midfield aren't stepping up to provide it.
Sky blues talk forum year 2029Sheaf plays CDM as does Kelly.
What exactly is O'Hares job as number 10?
Some of our fans are bat shit mental. O'Hare is shocking, "yeah, but sheaf"
Sheaf plays CDM as does Kelly.
What exactly is O'Hares job as number 10?
Some of our fans are bat shit mental. O'Hare is shocking, "yeah, but sheaf"
Yeah he was but we need him to contribute with goal participation or we end up relying on O'Hare which clearly isn't working when he's off form.
Kelly, Sheaf and Dabo have 3 assist and 0 goals between them.
To be fair , doesn't that happen at Liverpool too most seasons with trent ?If Kane and O'Hare play the same amount if minutes. Kane will get more goals and assists.
The right back.
All round Sheaf is who I want in the centre of the park, not as an AM. This doesn’t to me look like an individual problem but collectively we just look on tilt. Sluggish, lacking intensity and looking more like the side of last season that doesn’t believe we can win against ‘good’ sides.
Robins also clearly has some favourites which is clouding his decision making more as the results continue to slide. We need some reinforcements in January and to work to regain that higher tempo style from before.
Sheaf plays CDM as does Kelly.
What exactly is O'Hares job as number 10?
Some of our fans are bat shit mental. O'Hare is shocking, "yeah, but sheaf"
He plays behind the strikers and in front of the midfield.O hare doesn’t play as a number 10
today wasnt abject, we were just beaten by a better team
Russell slade football is abject
we got out thought in the 1st half -
Beat stoke in our next home match and we are probably top 6 at half way
I agree Fadz played the best. It wasn't a inspired performance by the team overall. I thought the difference was WBA had two strong centre half's in their 3 CB's and we only had Fadz who was at the same level of quality.Many poor performances tbh , Fadz best on the pitch despite a couple of minor mistakes
Even my mate who's a baggies fan and has no idea who dabo is saidHe fell asleep and let Grant run all on his own towards our goal.
Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
Reckon those marks about right.that city team unrecognisable from the every other game .Moore 6
Dabo 5 - Playing at CB is stupid. Horredous passer of the ball. However, he was far better going forward.
McFadzean - 6 Another decent outing.
Rose 5
Kane - 5
Maatsen - 5
Sheaf 5 - I got slated for saying he was poor in the first half. Odd really poor ball and weak for their first goal. Still better than the rest of the midfield.
Hamer N/A. Naff but clearly not fit. You lose his drive forward when he went off and subsequently we were poor on the edges of the box.
O'Hare 3: Not good at all. Looks knackered. Couldn't control the ball. We are desperate for an alternative in January. Give him and rest and competition.
Godden 4 - Struggled. A great finisher but painfully slow and a lack of ability at times on the ball.
Gyökeres 4: He must be praying each night that Waghorn is back soon so he can return to playing off the last man.
Frustrating today but we are playing like the midtable side we all expected us to be before the season started. A lot of tired players on the pitch and a lack of alternatives in the squad.
O’Hare was not abject. Did you have one too many before kick off?Normally yes, but not on today's evidence. Jobello and Hilsner must fancy a start next game after Ohares abject display.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?