Just beat me to it lolI thought 6’s and 7’s with honourable mentions for James and Eccles. Bournemouth were just too strong
Agree with that but maybe a 7 for James.Marosi 5 slow off line first goal, near post 2nd
Eccles 7 thought he did ok
Pask 5 all over the place
Mcfadzean 6
OST 6
McCallum 6
Kelly 5 poor passing
James 8 motm only player who didn’t look out of His depth v Bournemouth players
Ohare 6
Walker 6
Godden 5
Thompson 3 sorry lad but championship football is way out your league at this point
Side of him in off near postDid the 2nd goal meg Marosi or did it go between his right foot & near post? I could not work it out at the time.
Fucked by the woodwork againSide of him in off near post
I hate the term 'free hit'. It'a bollocks. Leeds didn't class their game today as a 'free hit' against Man City. As good as Bournemouth are on paper they are only 6th in the league.Today was a free hit and they're a good side despite only just in play offs. In spells I thought we did ok. A bunch of 6s andc7 for James. Hamer to start Thursday though.
Walker looked very lively and showed some real good touches. He is definitely better in a two, shame Godden was so quiet.
James also did well, fantastic goal. We never seem to score many goals directly from free kicks.
Eccles showed some goal touches but he, Pask and Thomson were torn to shreds by their winger.
Disappointed with another goal that Marosi should have done better with.
Generally an okay performance against a team lightyears away.
they are behind Barnsley in the division
I hate the term 'free hit'. It'a bollocks. Leeds didn't class their game today as a 'free hit' against Man City. As good as Bournemouth are on paper they are only 6th in the league.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I thought he was good todayMcCallum a 7? Wow.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I hate the term 'free hit'. It'a bollocks. Leeds didn't class their game today as a 'free hit' against Man City. As good as Bournemouth are on paper they are only 6th in the league.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
How do you know if Leeds felt they had nothing to lose and just went for it? Probably was the case when they went down to 10 men.
His throwing were good, thats about it. I gave him a 6 which was generousI thought he was good today
I mean , they had some extreme luck on their side when man city had 29 shots to their 2 and they manage to win 2 -1 ..I hate the term 'free hit'. It'a bollocks. Leeds didn't class their game today as a 'free hit' against Man City. As good as Bournemouth are on paper they are only 6th in the league.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Agree with those marks apart from giving Walker a 6Marosi 5 - could have saved at least one of the goals. Distribution not brilliant.
Eccles 6 - lad did ok tbf
Pask 5 - fell on his arse for first goal. Good athlete but doesn’t look like he reads the game well.
McFadzean 6 - did ok.
Ostigard 6 - reasonable
Mccallum 7 - thought he made some good interceptions and caused a few problems with his long throws. Didn’t look out of his depth.
Kelly 5 - some wayward passes and just a bad day at the office.
James 7 - goal gets him an extra point. Didn’t do a lot wrong
O'Hare 6 - puts in the effort.
Godden 5 - couple of times should have shot rather than faff around.
Walker 5 - didn’t get back onside fast enough. This little fact often breaks down our momentum on the break.
Subs
Thompson 4 - not ready for this level.
Hamer 6 - ok
Gyo 6 - ok
Allen 5 - not his level
Baka 4 - not any level.
I thought he defended well against a couple of strong forwards especially BrooksHis throwing were good, thats about it. I gave him a 6 which was generous
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Because their manager wants them to play the same way against everyone. Sometimes they get carved apart, other times it pays off spectacularly. Others away at Man City and down to 10 men would probably just try and hold firm
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?