italiahorse
Well-Known Member
It's difficult to talk football when there's an elephant in the room.
People don't get the message. People think they have some god given right to do what they want I guess.
If they have a post moderated they go off their tits crying outrage like it is some big conspiracy against them and love to be the victim.
It's difficult to talk football when there's an elephant in the room.
I went and watched the 'Wolf of Wall street' last night. Not as good as the books. But did still convey the bullshit attitude of them all. And there were some really great boobs. Anybody else seen it?
So if somebody wants to post the same thing over and over, do it in the same thread. It isn't hard to understand is it?
But surely it's relevant to every thread?
When we win, sign players etc that's all great, but the thought of "will CCFC still exist?" is always at the back of fans minds?
Once the off field problems are sorted, you will find threads will stay on topic IMO
No, it isn't relevant to every thread. People don't want to talk about it in every thread.
Off field problems or not, people need to learn how to use forums as we will be clamping down and people will get bans if they act like dicks about it.
So if say Moussa signs a contract for another 3 years, it will be an offence for someone to say "well that's if CCFC exist for 3 years" ?
So if say Moussa signs a contract for another 3 years, it will be an offence for someone to say "well that's if CCFC exist for 3 years" ?
If people purposely try to take threads off topic then yes.
But you are as bad or worst than most--so what happens when you ban yourself??
Seriously if you want a GMK mkII, just ban a load of people you dont agree with, and you and the other 3 can enjoy yourselves...
Hopefully Valiant
Thats what it looks like isn't it.
Nick doesn't agree with people slagging off sisu so threatens to ban them.
Utterly pathetic.
What about the other lot, the pro sisu anti council brigade?
They get a pat on the back because he agrees with them.
What happened to freedom of speech?
Thats what it looks like isn't it.
Nick doesn't agree with people slagging off sisu so threatens to ban them.
Utterly pathetic.
What about the other lot, the pro sisu anti council brigade?
They get a pat on the back because he agrees with them.
What happened to freedom of speech?
But you are as bad or worst than most--so what happens when you ban yourself??
Seriously if you want a GMK mkII, just ban a load of people you dont agree with, and you and the other 3 can enjoy yourselves...
Yes it does get all a bit tedious but it's the most serious thing going on at the club. If you think people are going to spend hours debating the arrival of a couple of temporary 18 year old loanees over the ongoing saga of the clubs exile and the potential for future disaster and extinction then you're wrong. Every day now Nick is beginning to sound more like a kid with a new toy. If you don't want contrary opinions then I'd suggest you shut down the bloody forum altogether.
It's not about contrary opinions though ashdown. Every thread gets turned into the same old crap that we've all heard thousands of times.Yes it does get all a bit tedious but it's the most serious thing going on at the club. If you think people are going to spend hours debating the arrival of a couple of temporary 18 year old loanees over the ongoing saga of the clubs exile and the potential for future disaster and extinction then you're wrong. Every day now Nick is beginning to sound more like a kid with a new toy. If you don't want contrary opinions then I'd suggest you shut down the bloody forum altogether.
It's not about contrary opinions though ashdown. Every thread gets turned into the same old crap that we've all heard thousands of times.
It's not about contrary opinions though ashdown. Every thread gets turned into the same old crap that we've all heard thousands of times.
By both sides. I think that's what people have an issue with if it's painted (as it is) as only an issue with one side.
There are just as many who take threads off about the council (grendel's doing it on one thread as we speak) that do about Sisu. The only difference is that Sisu own the club and therefore actually have some link to the main topic of this forum.
Absolutely by both sides. I think it's more noticeable from the more fervent anti sisu posters, because there's more of them.By both sides. I think that's what people have an issue with if it's painted (as it is) as only an issue with one side.
There are just as many who take threads off about the council (grendel's doing it on one thread as we speak) that do about Sisu. The only difference is that Sisu own the club and therefore actually have some link to the main topic of this forum.
It's not about contrary opinions though ashdown. Every thread gets turned into the same old crap that we've all heard thousands of times.
Absolutely by both sides. I think it's more noticeable from the more fervent anti sisu posters, because there's more of them.
I think it's all a bit unavoidable sadly. These forums are generally the only way fans can express their feelings with a situation that has been getting steadily worse for a couple of years now. Emotion will inevitably lead to finger pointing and counter finger pointing as the merry go round continues. The only time the forum comes alive is when a lot of City fans have been to a match and can discuss the day. Whilst 85% are not attending regularly then they can mainly only discuss the reasons why not and their stance !
Yes, BUT NOT IN EVERY THREAD.
It isn't a hard concept is it? Seriously?
People come on here and act like kids.
Maybe have more moderators and take a bit more action if threads are derailed such removing the posts going off topic, temp bans for repeat offenders, merging multiple posts on the same subject? Might not work but if people can't 'get away with it' as easily they might think twice.
Thanks Dave, I think that will be the plan
Because you don't agree with what i say?
I don't agree with what you say but i wouldn't want you banned.
Grow up mark.
Wow, something I'd never see, you telling someone to grow up.
Maybe have more moderators and take a bit more action if threads are derailed such removing the posts going off topic, temp bans for repeat offenders, merging multiple posts on the same subject? Might not work but if people can't 'get away with it' as easily they might think twice.
The process wouldn't be bam you are banned.
It would be a polite PM, then a warning through the site with a reason and then probably a final warning before a weeks ban (maybe even a day just to chill out).
I'm up for that kind of setup. I'm as guilty as any sometimes so if I got a temporary ban then it would be no one else's fault but my own.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?