it was a huge shame as he had it his grasp to significantly alter the whole dynamics but he chose not to shame as they are a COVENTRY based charity
Don't forget the money spent on balloons!Can we stop this nonsense about them being a charity, they made donations totaling £89k last year from income of £1.4m. The Charity spends the majority of its income on running a bar.
Can we stop this nonsense about them being a charity, they made donations totaling £89k last year from income of £1.4m. The Charity spends the majority of its income on running a bar.
View attachment 11660
Still, he can keep banging on about "conditions" all the time. Bloke is just as much of a snake as the rest of them.
pay rise of nearly £10,000 from year beforeDisapointed to see that.
Even worse pkwh pays himself £65k (note right near the end of report.)
£65k more than Fisher got from Otium, in the last accountsDisapointed to see that.
Even worse pkwh pays himself £65k (note right near the end of report.)
Fisher must be paid by one of the other companies under SISU's control£65k more than Fisher got from Otium, in the last accounts
We haven't seen Otium accounts yet.£65k more than Fisher got from Otium, in the last accounts
Click here to view the Coventry City Football Club (Otium Enterainment Group Limited) Accounts.We haven't seen Otium accounts yet.
I looked not too long ago and thry were not there! When did they pop up.
And £40,000 less then Grendel,£65k more than Fisher got from Otium, in the last accounts
Can we stop this nonsense about them being a charity, they made donations totaling £89k last year from income of £1.4m. The Charity spends the majority of its income on running a bar.
Catchy.A fairer - but still damning - summary might be: 'Given that running a bar isn't particularly profitable, it's fortunate that the AHCT revenues where boosted by net investment & other income of ~£438k; but after taking into account non-direct charitable activity & governance costs of ~£105k (boo), the AHCT was left with a total surplus of ~£439k in the year of which only ~£89k was actually donated to charitable causes, with the balance of ~£350k being carried forward for future use'.
Ha imagine that in the telegraph. The family of lawyers would be fuming£65k more than Fisher got from Otium, in the last accounts
Thanks for posting the link to the AHCT year to 5 April 2018 Consolidated Financial Statements.
I'm no fan of charities and all their admin costs, but I do think you were being a bit disingenuous to only quote that gross income figure of £1.4m, while ignoring the very significant and pretty relevant trading subsidiary costs of £847k (you don't make a lot of money running a bar: ~£106k, apparently).
A fairer - but still damning - summary might be: 'Given that running a bar isn't particularly profitable, it's fortunate that the AHCT revenues where boosted by net investment & other income of ~£438k; but after taking into account non-direct charitable activity & governance costs of ~£105k (boo), the AHCT was left with a total surplus of ~£439k in the year of which only ~£89k was actually donated to charitable causes, with the balance of ~£350k being carried forward for future use'.
Thanks for that. Like I said £89k
And I saw that one of the supposed conditions were that AEHC were to assist with CCFC-related charitable programmes (or something along those lines). What was so offensive about that?
That’s correct. Another condition was to be given access to the same information that had already been supplied to Wasps to verify the business was as healthy as was being claimed. I would suggest that’s not an unreasonable request.And I saw that one of the supposed conditions were that AEHC were to assist with CCFC-related charitable programmes (or something along those lines). What was so offensive about that?
That’s correct. Another condition was to be given access to the same information that had already been supplied to Wasps to verify the business was as healthy as was being claimed. I would suggest that’s not an unreasonable request.
Shame the media never press him on these conditions and just let him reel off his excuses.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?