Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Postponed Matches investigation (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter jordan210
  • Start date Dec 29, 2020
Forums New posts

jordan210

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #1
According to some rumours the EFL are launching an investigation in to why some clubs have postponed matches for false reasons (m sure @Nick said this would happen)

Some clubs have been breaking Covid protocols by not using multiple buses and not giving players own hotel rooms.


Some rumours of the clubs being investigated Rotherham, Bournemouth and Sunderland (These are just rumours iv seen)


Will be interesting to see who is under investigation and what the punishment will be.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #2
It was always obvious that people would play the game.
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #3
What I don't get is that Liverpool had two players out with Covid and they still played, Man City had two players out with Covid and their game is postponed.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #4
no_loyalty said:
What I don't get is that Liverpool had two players out with Covid and they still played, Man City had two players out with Covid and their game is postponed.
Click to expand...

It's a complete mess and it's only going to get worse
 
Reactions: SkyBlueChris and TomRad85

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #5
Nick said:
It was always obvious that people would play the game.
Click to expand...
Same with concussion substitutes, happened in cricket already.

India's Jadeja injured his hamstring batting against Australia but continued, later got hit on the head, still kept batting and made 44 from 23 balls, out of a total of 161-7. In the break before Australia batted he was substituted due to concussion and replaced with a specialist bowler who went on to take 3-25 and win man of the match!
 
Reactions: EalingSB and SkyBlueOz

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #6
no_loyalty said:
What I don't get is that Liverpool had two players out with Covid and they still played, Man City had two players out with Covid and their game is postponed.
Click to expand...

Man City had two players out for Boxing Day and played. Subsequent tests found multiple others positive so would think would have had 4 or 5 out for yesterday plus players having to isolate
 
Reactions: better days and Terry_dactyl

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #7
speedie87 said:
Man City had two players out for Boxing Day and played. Subsequent tests found multiple others positive so would think would have had 4 or 5 out for yesterday plus players having to isolate
Click to expand...

Fair enough, probably why then.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #8
speedie87 said:
Man City had two players out for Boxing Day and played. Subsequent tests found multiple others positive so would think would have had 4 or 5 out for yesterday plus players having to isolate
Click to expand...
The initial failed tests were two named players, Jesus and Walker, and two staff. The additional failed tests just said after testing players and staff which makes me wonder if any additional players were ruled out.
 
Reactions: SAJ
G

gazza

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #9
Rotherham cancelled their match against derby an hour or so before kick off, the derby team were already at the stadium
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #10
Interesting.
 

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #11
If there is any guilt discovered the team breaking protocols should have to forfeit the points
 
Reactions: Deleted member 2477

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #12
If there was one player at Man City you would have put money on catching Covid the serial shagger and rule breaker Walker would have been it.
 
Reactions: duffer, Wyken Sky Blue, Skyblueweeman and 4 others
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #13
Think people are mixing themselves up here. Sunderland are being investigated to see if they have been strict enough in enforcing coronavirus protocols. Not to see if they’ve been inventing coronavirus cases in order to have a day off.

Unless people think teams are falsifying cases (or deliberately infecting their players with coronavirus) just because they didn’t feel like playing for some reason, I’m not sure why points deductions would come into it.
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #14
Terry Gibson's perm said:
If there was one player at Man City you would have put money on catching Covid the serial shagger and rule breaker Walker would have been it.
Click to expand...

I can imagine hes getting dogs abuse lol
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #15
jordan210 said:
According to some rumours the EFL are launching an investigation in to why some clubs have postponed matches for false reasons (m sure @Nick said this would happen)

Some clubs have been breaking Covid protocols by not using multiple buses and not giving players own hotel rooms.


Some rumours of the clubs being investigated Rotherham, Bournemouth and Sunderland (These are just rumours iv seen)


Will be interesting to see who is under investigation and what the punishment will be.
Click to expand...

Rotherham and Bournemouth should be given 12 points deduction and Sunderland -24 pts deduction.
 
Reactions: TomRad85, better days and Deleted member 2477

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #16
Would be nice to see Rotherham lose some points.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #17
Liquid Gold said:
Would be nice to see Rotherham lose some points.
Click to expand...
Come on Barnsley tonight !!
 
H

Happy_Martian

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #18
On the other side of the coin, would the EFL penalise teams if by forcing the game to be played, the risk to others (officials, opposition players) would be too great ? Rotherham are playing because they have to or face a points deduction.

Paul Warne: Rotherham United boss fears 'points deduction' if Barnsley game called off

Rotherham United boss Paul Warne says his side fear a points deduction if they were to call off Tuesday's derby with Barnsley.
www.bbc.co.uk
 

Barnsley

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • #19
Sky Blue Harry H said:
Come on Barnsley tonight !!
Click to expand...
Smashing um pal
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Harry H
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #20
Happy_Martian said:
On the other side of the coin, would the EFL penalise teams if by forcing the game to be played, the risk to others (officials, opposition players) would be too great ? Rotherham are playing because they have to or face a points deduction.

Paul Warne: Rotherham United boss fears 'points deduction' if Barnsley game called off

Rotherham United boss Paul Warne says his side fear a points deduction if they were to call off Tuesday's derby with Barnsley.
www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...

This sums it up. Teams are under huge pressure to fulfil their fixtures, not to cancel them. The idea that teams would risk a points deduction just because they fancied a rest has always been ridiculous.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #21
SBT said:
This sums it up. Teams are under huge pressure to fulfil their fixtures, not to cancel them. The idea that teams would risk a points deduction just because they fancied a rest has always been ridiculous.
Click to expand...

It depends on the team doesn't it?
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #22
Nick said:
It depends on the team doesn't it?
Click to expand...

I mean, I guess? But it’s such a reckless gamble that it would have to be an extreme case to convince me. People on here were suggesting teams were trying it in the first few weeks of the season. It made no sense. People talking as if this was pub league stuff.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #23
SBT said:
I mean, I guess? But it’s such a reckless gamble that it would have to be an extreme case to convince me. People on here were suggesting teams were trying it in the first few weeks of the season. It made no sense. People talking as if this was pub league stuff.
Click to expand...

It makes perfect sense that people will try and manipulate the situation.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #24
Nick said:
It makes perfect sense that people will try and manipulate the situation.
Click to expand...

Paul Warne’s comments suggest otherwise. Again, this isn’t Sunday League.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #25
SBT said:
Paul Warne’s comments suggest otherwise. Again, this isn’t Sunday League.
Click to expand...

One manager said "possibility of a points deduction".

Did Tranmere get one when their players were car sharing?

There are no set rules, it is made up as they go along. It may as well be Sunday League.
 
Reactions: letsallsingtogether
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #26
Nick said:
One manager said "possibility of a points deduction".

Did Tranmere get one when their players were car sharing?

There are no set rules, it is made up as they go along. It may as well be Sunday League.
Click to expand...

I’ll take one manager speaking on the record as better evidence than randoms on a message board!

The rules have been clear since, well 1997, when they kept us up - fuck around with postponing fixtures for dodgy reasons, and you could lose points.

If Tranmere players have been car sharing then I’d rather assume that was because of sloppy application of the COVID rules (imagine that!) rather than some conspiracy to throw a game because they’re tired. Deliberately exposing your players to a deadly virus because you don’t fancy next week’s opponents seems a bit extreme to me.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #27
SBT said:
I’ll take one manager speaking on the record as better evidence than randoms on a message board!

The rules have been clear since, well 1997, when they kept us up - fuck around with postponing fixtures for dodgy reasons, and you could lose points.

If Tranmere players have been car sharing then I’d rather assume that was because of sloppy application of the COVID rules (imagine that!) rather than some conspiracy to throw a game because they’re tired. Deliberately exposing your players to a deadly virus because you don’t fancy next week’s opponents seems a bit extreme to me.
Click to expand...

Exactly, "could" lose points. It's at discretion which means it is made up as they go along.

Have the rules been clear? Were they clear when Bolton were picking and choosing?
 
S

skyblueexile

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #28
our problem is the defence keeps going into isolation - but does tell the goalkeeper
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #29
Nick said:
There are no set rules, it is made up as they go along. It may as well be Sunday League.
Click to expand...
Exactly this.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #30
no_loyalty said:
Fair enough, probably why then.
Click to expand...

But rules say as long as you have 14 fit players you should play as per the agreed protocols
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 31, 2020
  • #31
These teams also have loads of youth players they could play them in f needed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?