Gael isn't strong enough to play DM, I would rather have Thomas there.
The second line up would struggle to finish in the top half let alone top 6.
you think? bar willis it dont look too shoddy, although i still have faith bell can come good in l1 lol
could work buy a new central midfielder as we may lose bigi and keoghThis is how I'd go at the moment:
-----------------------Murphy-----------------------
Christie-------Keogh-------Wood--------Hussey
--------------Bigi---------Thomas-------------------
Baker-------------------------------------------Sheff
-------------------Fleck-------------------------------
------------------------Cody-------------------------
Got a decent defense, cover for the defense plus links from defense to midfield and from midfield to attack.
This is how I'd go at the moment:
-----------------------Murphy-----------------------
Christie-------Keogh-------Wood--------Hussey
--------------Bigi---------Thomas-------------------
Baker-------------------------------------------Sheff
-------------------Fleck-------------------------------
------------------------Cody-------------------------
Got a decent defense, cover for the defense plus links from defense to midfield and from midfield to attack.
could work buy a new central midfielder as we may lose bigi and keogh
Like yours but Clarke for Cyrus any day of the week and Deegan in somewhere to give us some bite and leadership (yeah I can get over his stupidity-if I didn't like footballers who were stupid, I'd only ever have gone to watch when Pat Nevin, Kevin Gallacher, Wayne Carlisle or Martin O'Neill were playing!).
Christie is faster and maybe a better dribbler, Clarke trumps him in all other aspects of the gameThe beauty of forums...always come across someone who sees things completely different to yourself. Not takin the piss, genuine question but why clarke over christie?
Personally i see Christie as the prefered option and i wouldnt have deegan anywhere near the team (for footballing reasons only). I think hea dire, absolutely hate it when he starts. Gives the ball away far too much and always seems out of possition to me.
The beauty of forums...always come across someone who sees things completely different to yourself. Not takin the piss, genuine question but why clarke over christie?
Personally i see Christie as the prefered option and i wouldnt have deegan anywhere near the team (for footballing reasons only). I think hea dire, absolutely hate it when he starts. Gives the ball away far too much and always seems out of possition to me.
The beauty of forums...always come across someone who sees things completely different to yourself. Not takin the piss, genuine question but why clarke over christie?
Personally i see Christie as the prefered option and i wouldnt have deegan anywhere near the team (for footballing reasons only). I think hea dire, absolutely hate it when he starts. Gives the ball away far too much and always seems out of possition to me.
I see Cyrus as a great athlete rather than a great footballer-his positional awareness is the worst in the squad of our defenders, and mentally he switches off. I don't really think he's a full back-he doesn't know where he's meant to be much of the time, and he doesn't exploit the space that the diamond gives the FB in the way that Hussey and Clarke do (and Keogh for that matter). He's fast, he's powerful, he's gutsy and determined, but he's very very raw still.
Clarke has the touch of a guy who's been playing in England representative teams all his life: for 5 years he was considered the best player in the country in his age group at his position, and that technique and touch shines through. His two goals for the club were both sublime and show what ability he has.
He is not a LB, yet was judged as inept as a player by many who saw him playing out of position. He had possibly the most horrific a player can have last Summer, in off the pitch circumstances, and that he was even playing at all last season speaks volumes about his mental courage. That by the end of the season he was one of our best players and major attacking outlets-remember all those Norwood diagonal balls?-is pretty remarkable.
But aside from the sob-story, I just think he's the best prospect in our squad, and I don't have any doubt that he'll play Premiership football. His skill, passing and overall game are superb when he's fit and confident-not that he's ever had much support from our fans, despite loving the club as much as us!!! I think his critics are probably the same people who had to change their tune about Turner, and they'll be doing the same about Clarke very shortly
Cracking reply mate thanks for taking the time. Like i said it was a genuine question as perhaps ive just not payed him much attention for what ever reason. I always seem to have a player or two that i overlook and just prefer somebody else with nothing solid to back it up with lol
Will certainly give him the benefit of the doubt. I liked christie for his effort last season and the fact he stepped up when needed. Thinking about what you have said you have very valid points about his game.
Still stand by my thoughs on Deegs though, he drives me mad!
2 amc and 1 striker can work as fleck and mcsheff will be like lavezzi and hamsik to codys cavani!
Maybe one of the most random sentences associated with Cov ever!
both sky blue kits...it works!
codys better though..........
i think gers sang "fleccccccccccccccccccck,fleck will tear you apart agaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin"
forget the name of the tune,sounds like depache mode.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?