'Players should not be punished for standing up to idiot pitch invaders' (1 Viewer)

RichieGunns

New Member
http://www.thenational.ae/thenation...ished-for-standing-up-to-idiot-pitch-invaders

Will Batchelor
Feb 7, 2013
Save this article

The football family was divided this week over the yellow card meted out to a Coventry City player for attempting to trip up an idiotic pitch invader.

Cyrus Christie clipped the heel of a tattooed thug as he ran amok at the Ricoh Arena on Tuesday night, during a heavy home defeat in a Johnstone's Paint Trophy match against Crewe (like I told you last month - Coventry are the biggest club in England).
Many people, including Coventry manager Mark Robins, thought it was a ludicrous overreaction from the referee.

Others pointed out that the laws of the game clearly state that players should not kick spectators, no matter how much they deserve it.
Personally, I thought Christie was lucky not to see a straight red for a professional foul - the kid was clearly through on goal and there was clear contact. Credit to the lad for not going to ground. He has clearly not watched enough Premier League action in recent years.

I joke. But this issue of players taking on pitch-invaders is a complex one, full of conflicting emotions. Logically, it makes no sense to encourage your highly-trained, finely-tuned and expensively-remunerated playing staff to act as part-time bouncers. That is like buying a racehorse to plough a sodden field. The moral case for intervention, however, is far stronger.

Firstly, you cannot ask 11 young men to form a team unit then expect them to stand idly by while a marauding assailant potentially threatens their safety.
The Coventry incident occurred just 24 hours after a Gillingham fan launched a cowardly attack on Jordan Archer, the Wycombe Wanderers goalkeeper.

Even “friendly” marauders, like the Barca fan who invaded the pitch to hug Lionel Messi during Wednesday’s Sweden-Argentina match, should surely be neutralised as soon as possible.What would Messi’s fellow professionals have said if that fan had done some harm to arguably the world’s greatest footballer? Sorry, we were waiting for a middle-aged steward to waddle over?

Which brings me to the second point. While we should respect stewards for doing a difficult and often thankless job, usually more for love of the game than financial reward, it should be noted that many of them are not exactly prime physical specimens.

This is why most pitch invasions create a tragi-farce in which a single pitch-invader - usually young, pumped up on adrenalin and unencumbered by a coat or, in most cases, shirt - can lead four, six or even eight lumbering stewards in a merry dance around the pitch for several minutes, turning them this way and that like a matador teasing an entire herd of hi-viz. bulls.

Meanwhile, 22 of the nation's fittest men stand around, hands on hips, watching. What kind of an example does that set to the young and impressionable fans we hear so much talk of? It hardly seems fair to punish footballers, who are so often maligned as spoilt brats living in a privileged bubble, for trying to end this embarrassing mismatch.

Perhaps this is why, when players do intervene in such incidents, the crowd love them for it, no matter which side they support. In the Cyrus Christie incident, the delight of the Coventry supporters at the hobbling of their own idiot fan is audible. Likewise, for perhaps the best example in this genre, albeit in rugby union not football, I would urge you to watch the YouTube footage of Bath centre Olly Barkley tackling a pitch invader during a match against Sale Sharks last year.

He then pinned the cretin down until two stewards, gratitude writ large on their faces, arrived. Again, the delight of the supporters is audible, perhaps because they are proud to see a player take a moral stand on behalf of the lowly stewards. Or, just possibly, because it is funny to see a swift and brutal demonstration of the difference in physical attributes between the athletes who have earned the right to take to the field, and the attention-seeking cretins who have not.

--------------------------------

My favourite comment is this one:

lead four, six or even eight lumbering stewards in a merry dance around the pitch for several minutes, turning them this way and that like a matador teasing an entire herd of hi-viz. bulls.

Good article though :D
 

Nick

Administrator
If the stewards did their jobs he wouldnt have had to trip him! What would have happened if the players didnt grab him? The stewards were just stood there wondering which oap they could team up on of it all kicked off!

I personally think if you run on the pitch the players should be able to defend themselves and throw punches!

We should get old skool bouncers, the sort who woul drag you round the bag and give you a slap if you act up!
 

jabharty

Member
The thing that got me about it was that the stewards weren't even on the pitch! They were just standing around doing nothing. Risk assessment or something like that...
He would have been running for a while if it wasn't for Cyrus.
 

RichieGunns

New Member
What sickened me was Crewe number 5 Ellis.

He was the one that brought Cyrus's actions to the linesman.

He was the one who got Cyrus booked in the end!
 

Jonny

Well-Known Member
Considering I know the kid whom it was, I'd hardly call him a thug. Fair play to Christie for tripping him.
 

tippex9

New Member

tippex9

New Member
Lol every chance
 

Tom's Dad

Member
I think Cyrus has a good case. Running on the pitch is a criminal offence so all he was doing was making a citizens arrest. The force he used was slight and reasonable, so no problem in law. By accepting the booking the FA are obviously against citizens carrying out their moral duty! I think he should appeal it, the FA aren't above the law. Are they?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top