Cast your minds back to the start of the season.
Fisher whinged that despite relegation the club paid out a substantial amount in bonuses.
The bonus system was changed so that players would only benefit from success ie winning games and final league position.
Well, with the 10 point deduction, has this cost the players a significant amount of money, and could this explain last nights thrashing at Walsall?
I wonder then - if by some miracle the club finish less than 10 points outside the top 6, would the players have grounds to sue SISU for loss of earnings - based on if they hadn't entered admin they would have made the top 6 and as such have their bonuses?
I wonder then - if by some miracle the club finish less than 10 points outside the top 6, would the players have grounds to sue SISU for loss of earnings - based on if they hadn't entered admin they would have made the top 6 and as such have their bonuses?
Cast your minds back to the start of the season.
Fisher whinged that despite relegation the club paid out a substantial amount in bonuses.
The bonus system was changed so that players would only benefit from success ie winning games and final league position.
Well, with the 10 point deduction, has this cost the players a significant amount of money, and could this explain last nights thrashing at Walsall?
Well after watching MOD3 on BBC I learnt that players got bonuses on the position the club finishes in so it could have had an effect on the players but it could also make them want to finish as high as possible as well despite this?
Cast your minds back to the start of the season.
Fisher whinged that despite relegation the club paid out a substantial amount in bonuses.
The bonus system was changed so that players would only benefit from success ie winning games and final league position.
Well, with the 10 point deduction, has this cost the players a significant amount of money, and could this explain last nights thrashing at Walsall?