D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Last edited by a moderator:
I was asking why you always argue sisu's corner if you want them gone? We're not just talking being dubious of new owners I was talking about their business tactics and ethics. If you really want sisu gone you don't come across like that and seem to question everything that is detrimental to sisu and then bleet that's because you're a proper fan. No need to resort to namecalling(zombie, nobbish?) something you're quick to label others with I've noticed
Simple... a debt to equity swap. Means SISU can repurchase Ltd without spending a penny.
Your memory must be sub-par. The likes of Cranie, Westwood and Gunnarsson walked for free; they should have been sold.
But SISU already owned it?
the dont.. ARVO do, or whichever company its called now. And even if it was SISU debt, they could just do the takeover via a new company they set up & say they will take on the current debt .. happens all the time in these situations
Well perhaps you need to fecking read.
Seriously, some of you are a joke.
Another one who really is incapable of reading and leaps to all kinds of conclusions.
Perhaps I naively think some city fans would have learned not to go for the zombie pack mentality and demand new owners they know feck all about (or they know they've failed in the past and still support them for some bizarre reason!), so they can then spend however long afterwards bleating on like miserable sozzled old drug addicts about how they've been screwed over.
I could equally ask why you want to get rid of people whose views differ from yours. Pathetic that's what it is, people like you who kill the club, and then you wonder why feck all fans go when some are so nobbish towards their fellow supporters.
Well perhaps you need to read better then.
Seriously, some of you are a joke.
What if they're out bid though, what would the Cayman Islands mob do then - bid more to buy back their own debt? (not too hot on this though)the dont.. ARVO do, or whichever company its called now. And even if it was SISU debt, they could just do the takeover via a new company they set up & say they will take on the current debt .. happens all the time in these situations
and pray it all works out ok thats who what and where we are.
What if they're out bid though, what would the Cayman Islands mob do then - bid more to buy back their own debt? (not too hot on this though)
Northern
Just to clarify your original point.
The Higgs Charity have offered the same to Mr Haskell as they did with SISU.
They agreed a heads of terms to allow SISU the opportunity to buy out their Share of ACL.
Whoever ends up owning the club after all this has been sorted out I'll cautiously support because I have no choice, they'll be the owners after all.
Until the club's married to them it'd be best to keep the options open in case there is something better hanging around in an alleyway sniffing the club's pants just waiting to be noticed.
If the end result is with us rid of SISU maybe we could start a collection.They'll have a price where it's worth their while to leave, the same as anybody does.
The only question is whether anybody feels that price is worth paying.
Isn't the Higgs share an exclusive option for the club only, though?
So how can they make an agreement with someone who is nothing to do with the club, provisional or otherwise?
How long do we keep the options open? Or do we take the only option that is available at the time because there may be no others?
One of Ranson's defining quotes:
'I promise you one thing, Keiren Westwood will not be leaving this club for nothing'
There are too many of them, but some would have it that everything he said was done at gunpoint.
Not long till he is back Lord.......
You don't automatically assume there's no other option and make it so out of desperation.
Or you end up getting shafted over and over again.
We're better than that.
Another one who really is incapable of reading and leaps to all kinds of conclusions.
Perhaps I naively think some city fans would have learned not to go for the zombie pack mentality and demand new owners they know feck all about (or they know they've failed in the past and still support them for some bizarre reason!), so they can then spend however long afterwards bleating on like miserable sozzled old drug addicts about how they've been screwed over.
I could equally ask why you want to get rid of people whose views differ from yours. Pathetic that's what it is, people like you who kill the club, and then you wonder why feck all fans go when some are so nobbish towards their fellow supporters. Seriously, some of you need to get a grip and stop thinking everyone's out to get you. This ain't your fecking board anymore than it is mine, so stop trying to shut others up and either talk to them, or shut the feck up.
There are too many of them, but some would have it that everything he said was done at gunpoint.
You don't automatically assume there's no other option and make it so out of desperation.
Or you end up getting shafted over and over again.
We're better than that.
ARVO don't and never have owned anything in the group, and more to the point it is just another SISU fund. They have just got charges against the club for providing unspecified 'services'.
Oh Goodie!
There are idiots and childish behaviour on both sides of this debate that is for sure, constant insults, silly pet names it's very sad and makes for a nasty atmosphere but I can't help but think you being very hypocritical, a very significant percentage of your posts are sarcastic put downs often deliberately misrepresenting someones position.
It's rare you sensibly debate and when you do as soon as someones says something you don't have an argument against you stop responding and move onto the next place you can be sarcastic.
When I try to sensibly debate some c unit comes along with some c unitish comment about me being a SISU plant.
Seriously, it really is moronic, childish and pathetically naff.
How can I debate when I get twattish responses like that?
Some people like Nonleagueherewecome (you too for that matter!), BrightonSkyBlue (another who disagrees with me but is polite, civil, and actually tries to talk about things on their merits) answer the words, some decide to see evil everywhere and it's pathetic, idiotic and downright immature.
This thread was better when it was about Going For Gold.
Isn't the Higgs share an exclusive option for the club only, though?
So how can they make an agreement with someone who is nothing to do with the club, provisional or otherwise?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?