No issue with a short term deal. He's always been good in championship
Although we need wingers more than strikers
Bamford can play anywhere across the forward line I believe.
Ya but I'd rather a winger like emc or saka rather than another jamie Peterson typeBamford can play anywhere across the forward line I believe.
He could sign until January on a short term contract.don’t mind it, but if it means we don’t sign a quality winger in January then i’m against it.
I don't see any incentive for either of the 2 parties for him to sign him for 2 months.He could sign until January on a short term contract.
And who knows, maybe Lats moves on in January, or Brau goes out on loan.
Plenty of options.
He gets to prove his fitness and we get a 3rd choice striker.I don't see any incentive for either of the 2 parties for him to sign him for 2 months.
We dont know if anyone is carrying a knock, or maybe Bamford can pass on his experience to Simms (for example) in a player/coach position for a short term deal.I don't see any incentive for either of the 2 parties for him to sign him for 2 months.
Yup, exactly thisIt could be one of those signings of a player for his experience and presence in the dressing room more than anything else, he's been promoted a couple of times after all.
Likely to be looking for a training place as per another poster
Its come from a reputable journalist, i think hes from The TelegrpahIf this is true (massive if as it came from football league World) it will be similar to the Patterson deal.: influence in training, seat on the bench, maybe come on for a few cameos and score an important late worldie off his shin.
It's not from FLW, it's from a Telegraph journalist with 100k followersIf this is true (massive if as it came from football league World) it will be similar to the Patterson deal.: influence in training, seat on the bench, maybe come on for a few cameos and score an important late worldie off his shin.
Given his form I would keep BTA playing wide/behind the striker. Makes sense then if we want a 3rd choice option. Currently if Wright or Simms got injured we’d have no striker on the bench.Is he any better than Wright, BTA or Simms? Probably not. If the interest is genuine, it would indicate a possible injury concern with one of the three mentioned
What underlying stats? Just checked his xg figures and they’re very good.He's shit now. It's a no from me. Not only from watching him/his obvious stats. His actual underlying stats are dreadful. Just don't see it happening.
Up until this rich vein of form, BTA had horrendous finishing, If his movement is is till there and intelligence, I think Lampard and Edwards have shown they can coax the finishing out of him. Bamford can easily be a good squad player for us, and good competition for Simms.Who needs scouts and coaches when you can ask chatgpt
Is Patrick Bamford still good at football
Short answer: yes and no — Bamford still has useful qualities, but his recent form, fitness and role have all declined significantly.
Here’s a fuller breakdown:
What the positives are
- Bamford has proven in the past that he can perform at a high level. For example, during the 2020-21 season at Leeds United in the Premier League he scored 17 goals. StatMuse+2Wikipedia+2
- He brings more than just goal-scoring: intelligent movement, pressing, ability to act as a focal point up front. One article noted that even in recent years, despite the decline in goals, his ability to occupy defenders and create space for others remains “arguably more present … than any other striker at the club”. Leeds United News
- When fully fit, he still has the build and experience to contribute at a high level.
What the concerns are
- Injuries: Bamford has had recurrent fitness issues which have prevented consistent high-level performance. Yorkshire Post+1
- Form drop: In the 2024-25 season in the Championship, his output was very low. According to one source: 17 appearances, 0 goals, little to no starting games. FootyStats
- Role at his club: His manager at Leeds, Daniel Farke, publicly stated that Bamford is not part of his plans for the upcoming season. FotMob+2Yorkshire Post+2
- Finished product: Even when he’s come into games, the chance conversion and overall sharpness have been questioned. For instance:
Bamford can still be good — especially if you get the version of him that’s fit and confident. But right now:
My verdict
- He is not the reliable, high-output striker he once was.
- He seems to be moving into a phase where he is more of a squad option, substitute, or brings value in specific scenarios (e.g., pressing, movement) rather than being the main goal-scorer.
- Many signs suggest his best years (in terms of consistent output) are behind him.
It's not from FLW, it's from a Telegraph journalist with 100k followers
It's come from a telegraph journalist who's recently been to the training ground to write another articleIf this is true (massive if as it came from football league World) it will be similar to the Patterson deal.: influence in training, seat on the bench, maybe come on for a few cameos and score an important late worldie off his shin.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?