Owners of CCFC willing to hold talks over Ricoh return (3 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
People would start going in the shop too. I need a new mug for starter's

Just invite Sky Blue John round for tea.
 

The Reverend Skyblue

Well-Known Member
Best of luck Rev, its a great idea. I have similar back problems and may well drop you a line sometime to see how you are getting on, to perhaps inspire myself to head in a new direction. Oh and happy birthday too :D

Moff drop me a line anytime in the future.

sorry people back on topic, great news hopefully
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Is "Coventry community" the new "Coventry area"?

At least it shows an awareness of PR that was previously lacking.

I'm suspicious. Things are looking up, as a City fan experience tells me I'm about to be kicked in the balls.
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
I got the open letter too. A very clear statement that ACCESS TO MATCH DAY REVENUES is all that is standing between CCFC and a return to the Ricoh paying a fair rent. Indeed, it seems that "We have always been happy to pay a competitive rent".

No mention of never dealing with the City Council again, "unencumbered freehold", "land enablement", "value creation", getting a return on past investment blunders, or snapping up ACL on the cheap at the expense of the people of Coventry and the local charity.

It sounds good to me, and should be easy enough to sort out. I am of course assuming a willingness to pay to get the revenues back, and bit of goodwill between the various parties. What could possibly go wrong?
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I got the open letter too. A very clear statement that ACCESS TO MATCH DAY REVENUES is all that is standing between CCFC and a return to the Ricoh paying a fair rent. Indeed, it seems that "We have always been happy to pay a competitive rent".

No mention of never dealing with the City Council again, "unencumbered freehold", "land enablement", "value creation", getting a return on past investment blunders, or snapping up ACL on the cheap at the expense of the people of Coventry and the local charity.

It sounds good to me, and should be easy enough to sort out. I am of course assuming a willingness to pay to get the revenues back, and bit of goodwill between the various parties. What could possibly go wrong?

th
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
The bigger picture is stadium ownership.

Maybe they are now thinking let's get back some how and prove we can be nice for a while and then they will hand the keys for the Ricoh to them?
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Don't care if they own it or not.
Just want to watch my team play in Coventry would like to have owners that were trustworthy and transparent.
Want us to build a team we can be proud of again.
Want to be able to have banter with opposition fans at work.

Fuck me that is the reason I started to go to football for seems we have lost it all in one foul stroke....

Just give us our team back give us our Saturdays back give us our friends back.

if they want our trust back they will have to work hard to get it.

So yes I am bitter will never forget what they have done.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Possibly a step in the right direction, with realistic aims.

But, the we have failed to communicate with you and want to do better.....come on SISU you keep peddling that line without ever improving your relationship with the fans or communication with them. Never mind AEG to run the stadium, you want to all enrol on a public relations course and learn a bit about customer care.
 

kmj5000

Member
Dear Coventry City supporters,

Our issue is why should the money you spend in support of the football club be taken away from the club? The first team and Academy should not be disadvantaged - your money should be invested into putting the best team on the pitch and cultivating young players that you can be proud of. As you know, investment in the playing talent is the lifeblood of a football club.

- Joy Seppala & Tim Fisher

My issue is that why did SISU waste £500k of taxpayers' money on a ”hopeless" court case (which they may be ordered to re-imburse) and a similar (or even greater) amount on its own legal fees? This is money that could have been invested into "putting the best team on the pitch and cultivating young players."

It'll take many, many years of matchday revenue to recoup these costs, income which SISU will expect to be given for nothing, no doubt?

The "lifeblood of the club" is not your "investment in the playing talent” (or lack of it over the past few years) Joy, it's the fans - but you still haven't realised it yet have you?
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
The main objective has to be getting back to the Ricoh and if it means ACL waving goodbye to that £590k that's what should happen imo. Get back home first then continue the fight to get these tripe hounds out of our club. For those who think we should stick with Sepalla, Fisher & co please tell me what they have done for the football team where it counts ON the pitch.
 

Frisky blue

New Member
They have paid it -- how stupid are you?
Stupid?
Sums up a twat like you perfectly. Still apologising for the sisu clowns, now that is stupid. The shit you consistently spew is remarkable, it mirrors the shit sisu consistently spew. Now there is food for thought.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Surely all City fans want ghe club to get the money that is spent in the stadium on match days?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top