On the cheap (1 Viewer)

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Okay so I have taken out football operations and things like bar manager, chef etc. so trying to compare like for like with back office staff between CCFC and Walsall:
CCFC staff
FINANCE
Finance Controller: Alex Gault
Financial Administrator: Lorraine Sliwowski
Financial Administrator: Gillian Coulson
CLUB SHOP/TICKET OFFICE
Ticketing Assistant: Shelagh Brock
COMMERCIAL
Commercial Director: Adam Brearley - Leaving soon, unsure if being replaced......
Corporate Sales Manager: Tynan Scope
Commercial Administrator: Suzette Johnson
Head of Communications: Laura Hunter
Publications Editor/Graphic Designer: Mark Stokes
Media Executive: Billie Marshall
Head of Marketing: Mark Hornby

CCFC total 11 (soon to be 10)

Walsall
accounts:
Michelle Draisey, Liz Withey
Wages Administrator: Debbie Saunders
Receptionist: Diane Williams
Business Development Manager: Dianne Elsworth
Commercial Manager: Wayne Thomas
Conference & Events Department: Vicki Chambers (Conference & Events Manager), Sharna Patel -
Ticket Office Manager: Gemma Park
Supporter Liaison Officer: Daniel Mole
Media Officer: Dale Moon
Programme Editor & Club Journalist: Daniel Briggs
Marketing Officer: Daniel Clarke
Official Photographer: David Linney
Additional Photography: Kevin Grice

Walsall total 15
33% more staff than us, whilst we are a bigger club on the basis of having a 40% higher average gate.

2 of those are conferencing and events which we don't have because we don't run a stadium, and 2 of them are photographers.

Attendance means nothing, you don't need an additional accountant because you have more fans. Let's tall finance, walsalls last account they had a turnover of £6.7m, our last set of accounts showed us to have a turnover of just £4.7m. Perhaps with a turnover 40% higher than ours mean they need 33% more background staff...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
I'm defending the club not sisu.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

People aren't attacking the club. Well I'm not. I'm attacking Sisus investment/management of the club which in turn has created a shambles. It is in no way my friends or any of his colleagues fault. And neither am I saying it's a fault of 'the club' whatever that means these days.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
The club is what Sisu want it to be.
With no interest in the club and running 'breakeven' means we are in a downward spiral.

running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.

Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking
 

Nick

Administrator
running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.

Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking

And the communication to make the best of a break even situation situation.
 

Skybluesince82

Well-Known Member
2 of those are conferencing and events which we don't have because we don't run a stadium, and 2 of them are photographers.

Attendance means nothing, you don't need an additional accountant because you have more fans. Let's tall finance, walsalls last account they had a turnover of £6.7m, our last set of accounts showed us to have a turnover of just £4.7m. Perhaps with a turnover 40% higher than ours mean they need 33% more background staff...

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

We do conferencing and events: stuff is starting to take place at BPA, business networking breakfasts to name a couple. IMO it doesn't matter if two of them are photographers, that is all part of a media and communications team. Photography and video is done by the listed communications team at ccfc, which highlights that Walsall have a better back office infrastructure because they have specialists, rather than getting someone to do it as part of a different job. Goes back to the original post and point about stuff being done on the cheap.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.

Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking

Whilst you are right in principle, do many teams that are operating on a break even basis get promoted- and stay up more than 2 or 3 years? ( serious question as I don't know ).

We were given Yeovil as an example by Tim a couple of years ago. They got up with a budget of 2 million. All gone quiet over there now. Where is Yeovil in the league now?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.

Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking
Whats the point of owning a club if you don't want to put some money in it ?
Most clubs rely on their owners to waste a little money.
We have poor owners, poor management and now the resultant poor players.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
Whilst you are right in principle, do many teams that are operating on a break even basis get promoted- and stay up more than 2 or 3 years? ( serious question as I don't know ).

We were given Yeovil as an example by Tim a couple of years ago. They got up with a budget of 2 million. All gone quiet over there now. Where is Yeovil in the league now?

where are Bournemouth, Burton, Swansea et al

No offence to them, but we are a bigger club than Yeovil
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
Why do you give them oxygen ?
They don't even try to justify what they are doing to the club yet fans on here try and defend the indefensible.

You mean like you did two days ago, saying you didn't mind SISU staying as long as they signed a long term deal at the Ricoh.

Hypocrite.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
where are Bournemouth, Burton, Swansea et al

No offence to them, but we are a bigger club than Yeovil
We are a bigger club then Bournemouth, Burton and Swansea as well.
Funny but they have all had some of our best players on the cheap.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
We are a bigger club then Bournemouth, Burton and Swansea as well.
Funny but they have all had some of our best players on the cheap.
Which of our best players have Swansea and Burton had on the cheap? I honestly can't remember selling a player to either club?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
Toot toot !! Here come the Billy Bullshit Brigade again.
Get fucking real, after 8+ years of being shafted, CCFC real fans have had enough of these parasitical items
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
So - do we think MV will step down/back up to the boardroom and vacate the manager's post? perhaps TF will run the team (for free) until January, or should that say 'ruin it for free' !
 

ccfctommy

Well-Known Member
From what I see the club haven't even looked for a new manager. Has there even been any interviews etc?

Who makes up the coaching staf for the first team? Venus and Oggy? Micky Mouse.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
So - do we think MV will step down/back up to the boardroom and vacate the manager's post? perhaps TF will run the team (for free) until January, or should that say 'ruin it for free' !

No I think he will hang on as long as he can, I can't see a new manager bring brought in before the window closes as they will want to spend some of the money they bring in during the January sales and I can't see that being in the plans.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
From what I see the club haven't even looked for a new manager. Has there even been any interviews etc?

Who makes up the coaching staf for the first team? Venus and Oggy? Micky Mouse.

Tudgay coaches the strikers that's going well:banghead:
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
We are a bigger club then Bournemouth, Burton and Swansea as well.
Funny but they have all had some of our best players on the cheap.

Bournmouth paid one loan player £30k a week in the championship as an emergency loan signing. Yeah we are bigger than them,
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
where are Bournemouth, Burton, Swansea et al

No offence to them, but we are a bigger club than Yeovil

My question was whether clubs with a break even structure- without equity injection- got promotions. Yeovil was an example. Bournemouth and Swansea probably not.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
You mean like you did two days ago, saying you didn't mind SISU staying as long as they signed a long term deal at the Ricoh.

Hypocrite.

Never even thought of Sisu when I said that. It was all about what was best for the clubs survival.
More chance of someone taking over once we are settled with a long term deal.
Never said I didn't mind Sisu. Again you have missed my point.
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
Yeh great idea. it's really tight financially which is having some negative effect on the club....so let's reduce revenues to the club
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Can you give us a list of the non league teams who have bigger staffing size and cost, than us?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I would bet that the infrastructure at Forest Green, Tranmere and Wrexham is all on a more professional level than ours which is sort of the point he was making. Do you disagree with the central point of his post?
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.

Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking
What about actually trying to increase turnover so that the break even figure is higher. How about starting that that process by not alienating the fan base, by actual genuine engagement with them rather than continual lies and misinformation. The problem with Sisu's model is that the break even figure will decrease season on season due to their incompetence and mismanagement.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
My question was whether clubs with a break even structure- without equity injection- got promotions. Yeovil was an example. Bournemouth and Swansea probably not.

We are a bigger club than them. They have owners willing to put money in so they spiral up whereas we have owners who aren't so we're spiralling down. That's the difference.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
Never even thought of Sisu when I said that. It was all about what was best for the clubs survival.
More chance of someone taking over once we are settled with a long term deal.
Never said I didn't mind Sisu. Again you have missed my point.

I didn't miss your point. I asked for clarification that you were happy for us to sign a long term deal at the Ricoh and this is what you replied,

There is another option (preferred) and that relies on Sisu coming to the party and doing a long term deal with Wasps for the benefit of both parties.

Seems to me you were advocating SISU stay and sign a long term Ricoh deal. I think you said you wanted what best benefits SISU ;)

Perhaps we will have yet another opinion tomorrow.;)
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top