On another note (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter ccfc92
- Start date
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
as bad as that? or just an average performance?
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
He's frustrating because we slate him for being out wide or deep, but then, like against Crawley and Stevenage, can score from outside the box :facepalm::thinking about:
Lord_Nampil
Well-Known Member
Looked better once Ball came on but made to many bad decisions! Clearing Balls goal bound shot off the line being one of them! For me he went from his best performance for us to his worst in a matter of days!!!
WillieStanley
New Member
He was quiet and displayed why he may have struggled in the championship.
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Thats why I think he may stay. But we should really put in a clause about scoring minimum goals. I.e a small weekly wage, but a big goal bonus, to stop him getting lazy :thinking about:
Houchens Head
Fairly well known member from Malvern
Not sure his agent would allow him that sort of contract CCFC92? Good idea though!
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
That is the problem with my masterplan :facepalm:
But its beneficial to everyone. He has the chance to earn a high wage (inc the goal bonus). If he plays badly, he gets an average wage.
Out of interest, what is the highest wage atm at CCFC? (players)
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
sorry, where are we slating him? :jerkit:
WillieStanley
New Member
I think we've been making fair obvservations. He's no doubt a cut above the rest but yesterday he was quiet and made a few mistakes. Simply because he's been on a good run of form doesn't make him exempt from critisism.
Astute
Well-Known Member
We slated him by saying not the best player on the pitch?
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
oh, that's slating? :facepalm:
CarpyCov84
New Member
Nothing wrong with selfish strikers
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
apart from when your losing
WillieStanley
New Member
I think there has to be an element of selfishness, but you need to be a team player as well!!
Lord_Nampil
Well-Known Member
Against Crawley he was a team player, yesterday he wasn't! Though when he tried to be a team player he should have been selfish and gone on his own! Hes a great talent but for us as a team to get the best out of him we need the David McGoldrick that played against Crawley week in week out!
One thing yesterday he had a couple of chances to shoot but decided to pass, its making the right decision (like iv said in another tread) that will get the best results for the team!
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
Missed chances at 1-1 and with the last kick of the game
WillieStanley
New Member
Totally agree with you! We have had players making poor decisions of late but DMC is a 24 year old with the weight oflatea fragile team on his shoulders. I think that effects his decisions and the fragility of the rest effects theirs!
WillieStanley
New Member
And their keeper was on form!
