Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
I forgot Torchy....you're never wrong are you!
Tim Fisher "They need to re-enter negotiations pronto or we file"....don't think there's any doubts that this is a clear and real threat to liquidate...putting a gun to the clubs head as it were as if they were in some sort of hostage negotiation situation. You keep comparing the language being used in each corner but show us a direct quote where ACL have been quite so imflamatory...
I forgot Torchy....you're never wrong are you!
Que? ........check the poll again.
In fairness. Someone else started the stats skewing. Look back up the posts. Stats are good and bad.
Hope Grendel doesn't remove the post!Sure. I totally agree, these figures mean nothing. And either one of us can make good or bad of the figures.
Well, check one of the other threads where OSB58 explains it much better than I have obviously been trying to. Fisher has said that it was will inevitably happen to the club if we cannot get an agreement. ACL have said that is one of their options if they do not get their money. So, yes to all intents and purposes they have both threatened to liquidate. Or not, depending on how you feel or wish to twist the words.
What ACL said months ago is that winding up "is an option"................ it always has been .............. doesnt mean they would take it
Yes ACL have judgement for a statutory demand ............ the remedy for non payment of such is winding up........ that isnt what ACL have gone for
what SISU through TF said was
""We are at a tipping point and insolvent liquidation cannot be reasonably avoided."
"They need to re-enter negotiations pronto or we file. We'll have no option because there would not be reasonable probability of avoiding insolvency liquidation."
In reality neither are a threat ..... more a strong expression of what the realities are.
I dont understand why people on both sides of the argument are getting their knickers in a twist over it....... neither have said anything that wasnt actually true
In the words of (Use your imagination here) that Norwegian football commentator......
Maggie Thatcher.....Winston Churchill....Summerisle......Grenduffy.....Your boy Torchy has taken one hell of a beating!:claping hands:
In reality Torchy......You got served mate!:laugh::laugh::laugh:
ACL have an option to wind up-they at no point have threatened to use it. SISU have verbally said they might!
At least do me the honour of READING my previous posts on those subjects.
Yes, "might". If the situation can't be sorted out. You could also argue that ACL "might" if they can't get their money. Another word for SBK's "legal options". They both "might". OSB was bang on.
Why? If I want to read shit I'll read the Daily Mail.
ACL on liquidation: "We are putting the administration claim to avoid SISU attempting to liquidate the club".
Not a word of threat-they may have the capacity, but not the intent. Certainly not the stated intent.
SISU on liquidation: "We are considering getting out of town and liquidating the club".
An explicit threat.
Say I have a gun. Am I therefore guilty of being Derrick Bird?!? Ah, but I could go on a murderous rampage, so yes, I am.
Then don't make accusations that have no substance. You only make yourself look even more of a prat, than what you are now!:facepalm:
You got served "Bigtime" Torchy, now go and lick your wounds!:laugh:
Then don't make accusations that have no substance. You only make yourself look even more of a prat, than what you are now!:facepalm:
You got served "Bigtime" Torchy, now go and lick your wounds!:laugh:
It's a matter of interpretation and also hearing what you want to hear.
A skill you seem very adept at.
There's a huge difference between explicitly threatening something and having the capability to threaten it. I'm pretty flabbergasted that anybody could say it's the same. Is green the same as purple?
Do you mean like taking a undisclosed transfer figure, and as if by magic(Coz you say so) turning it into a "Estimated Fact"...Something you are extremely adept at doing!.........DOH!:facepalm:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?