Terry_dactyl
Well-Known Member
I’ll be ok with it if we were to sign those two lads from Derby.
I’ll be ok with it if we were to sign those two lads from Derby.We seriously cannot sell cal, he is the heart of our side, if he does go, who replaces him or do we change formation to accommodate his loss which i doubt very much.
If they’ve made an acceptable offer so be it - I fully believe Robins is getting the final say on transfers and will get a good chunk of any monies in on buying a replacement
We seriously cannot sell cal, he is the heart of our side, if he does go, who replaces him or do we change formation to accommodate his loss which i doubt very much.
Think the club are ensuring they are keeping all options alive , this will be one , probably not the chosen one though
He's not going anywhere, neither is Hamer or Gyokeres. Its just the typical rumor mill.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
I think the club have been open and the same noises from @Skybluebeliever who is close to the club that it’s likely we have to sell a player for a big fee this summer
I don't think this one is tbhHe's not going anywhere, neither is Hamer or Gyokeres. Its just the typical rumor mill.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Hamer is another similar to O’Hare but with him should he move on it could be a lower end Premiership outfit but I have always thought he could go abroad Germany perhaps then there’s the Giovanni van Bronckhorst connection at Rangers, champions league and all that but just as with CoH if we want to seriously challenge and I believe we can we have to keep him, with O’Hare, Palmer the underrated Ben Sheaf and possibly Eccles too our midfield options are so much stronger than last season. We have potentially a very strong side. As said lot of rumour & speculation I’m banking on it’s just that.
If we sell for a huge sum of over 10 mill atleast that will shut up people on here that think our top players are worth fuck all .. honestly the amount some people put our own players down is astonishing , they will watch shite players sell for more then say " ours aren't worth that "
Bore off
Is anyone really saying our top players are worth fuck all?
Most posts I've seen are fairly measured and simply pose the question which most are conveniently ignoring: If our players are that in demand then why hasn't the club already received bids of £10m+?
Either the club have inadvertently priced themselves out of sales by attaching over-inflated price tags onto their prized assets thinking clubs will bite and will therefore have to reassess. Or a club will eventually match their demands for one of the three.
I think everyone would agree that hopefully it's the latter.
Nonsense , I've seen a couple posters say our players are not worth what we think. Then will talk about worse players who moved in the past for more ,the same posters usually have very little good to say about anything tbh .
I'm in agreement with those posters. I personally don't think we're going to receive eight figure bids for either Hamer or O'Hare.
Clubs that were previously linked with the above have seemingly moved onto other targets, or have submitted bids well below the asking price, suggesting that they clearly thought/think both players aren't worth what the club are quoting.
The fact the club primarily wanted to sell Hamer but now are listening to offers for all players probably supports that point as well.
Things may change later on in the window but currently I wouldn't exactly say it's looking hopeful.
Going to be a hugely unpopular opinion but for longevity purposes I would much rather see him go now for 10-12 mill than next season for 3-5 because he has no time left on his contract. We’ve seen in this league that far too many clubs manage their finances unsustainably and frankly our model is to find gems, develop them and then make significant money. I think this one may well happen but I think in the long run it’ll be good for us. That being said it has shades of when mcsheffrey went to brum, will also be sad to see him go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd much rather we get as much as possible for players.
If that means we get £50m then so be it.
I agree , but the idea that a club like us that supposedly needs money is over valuing its prized assets is nonsense , when infact it's other clubs thinking they can take the piss out of us because we are little old coventry
All these arguements or "facts" (as some like to call their assumptions) on player value are irrelevant really. Any transfer fee will be undisclosed.
So, some will claim we accepted a paltry below par/value bid as FACT.
I dont think posters on here know tbh .. they like to think they do but they don't.
O hare we've pushed 2 bids back by all accounts, if that's true and they come again with a great offer that would tell you that infact SBT knows very little and that the club are the ones who will do the valuations not people on here
The proof will be in who we replace any departing player with.
All these arguements or "facts" (as some like to call their assumptions) on player value are irrelevant really. Any transfer fee will be undisclosed.
So, some will claim we accepted a paltry below par/value bid as FACT.
Going to be a hugely unpopular opinion but for longevity purposes I would much rather see him go now for 10-12 mill than next season for 3-5 because he has no time left on his contract. We’ve seen in this league that far too many clubs manage their finances unsustainably and frankly our model is to find gems, develop them and then make significant money. I think this one may well happen but I think in the long run it’ll be good for us. That being said it has shades of when mcsheffrey went to brum, will also be sad to see him go.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My worry is that even if we were to get 10 mill , we won't get to spend even 20% of that money
Most fees of that size are leaked to the press though.
Claiming "oh we don't know the exact fee because it's disclosed" is a pretty weak arguement.
I'm not arguing anything. Like I said, arguing over what a player is worth or what a transfer fee actually was, is futile. Either side of the arguement can twist it to suit their narratrive, but it's all conjecture. Trusting what Jonny McAnchorman says the transfer fee is, is also pretty niave.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?