His brother was hacked for killing the victims son and this was outside the court. Awful and no way should he keep his job.One of the groundsmen at Chequers has been sentenced to 26 months for affray and other charges. Not his first time involved with the law, but it's reported he's still keeping his job when he get's out.
Sort it out Starmer you wet lettuce
He would obviously have directly employed this chap and run his disciplinary process.What decision do we think starmer is responsible for?
I don’t understand is the story about convicted criminal keeping their job? Is that not ok? I’m confused what I should be angry about with this oneThe defence of him is almost as nauseating as the accusations.
I'd like to think people are well versed enough to know he doesn't get involved in low level appointments, but equally I would expect anyone working in close proximity to those in senior gov't office to be at the very minimum able to pass a DBS.
Do you think it's ok for someone involved in violence to be around our PM? Spent conviction or not, he shouldn't be anywhere near him imo.I don’t understand is the story about convicted criminal keeping their job? Is that not ok? I’m confused what I should be angry about with this one
For once, im actually with Pete on this one.I don’t understand is the story about convicted criminal keeping their job? Is that not ok? I’m confused what I should be angry about with this one
He kicked the father outside court who had just witnessed lads being jailed for killing his son. One of those convicted was this scumbag's brother.For once, im actually with Pete on this one.
What exactly has the guy done? Has he raped or murdered? Or has he had a few too many jars and had a scrap down the pub? I doubt he's a A-Cat prisoner. Maybe a few misdemeanours. And what is his job at Chequers? It says groundsman? So he mows the lawns and prunes the trees? I doubt he's rarely, if ever, comes in to contact with the PM. Id say, the average bloke on the street has just as much chance of bumping in to him.
If we stop every person thats ever had a criminal record ever getting in to employment again, then all we're going to do is A) support them all with benefits and B) push them back in to a life of crime.
And I never thought id see the day I agreed with Pete!
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Ok, I've just gone and looked at the report. So it would seem the original murder was most likely gang related. And the guy in question and his brother it would seem are both involved in the gang somehow.He kicked the father outside court who had just witnessed lads being jailed for killing his son. One of those convicted was this scumbag's brother.
He also has previous crimes on his sheet and with prisons full. they're not handing out 2 year+ sentences for nicking a few sweets.
Do you think it's ok he's near the PM? Not just this one, but any senior politician. Plenty of others who are law abiding I'm sure would like that opportunity.
So do you still think he should come out and keep that job?Ok, I've just gone and looked at the report. So it would seem the original murder was most likely gang related. And the guy in question and his brother it would seem are both involved in the gang somehow.
The job was probably some sort of government, outreach, ex-prison type thing id say. To try and reintergate ex offenders. Maybe a way of trying to turn people's lives around. But once in the job, to then go and re-offend, that's a 1 strike and out rule for me.
However, I'd be very surprised that his job, mowing the lawns, if he'd have had any face to face with Kier, or any previous PMs.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
No, i said that. 1 strike and out.So do you still think he should come out and keep that job?
So you don't agree with Pete then. Parity restoredNo, i said that. 1 strike and out.
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
It’s chequers gardening I think it unlikely it would need to be on his systemDo you think it's ok for someone involved in violence to be around our PM? Spent conviction or not, he shouldn't be anywhere near him imo.
No idea but I would think if there is even the slightest risk of interaction that it would be checked out and prevented. In fact anything that increases risk.It’s chequers gardening I think it unlikely it would need to be on his system
DBS wouldn’t be needed would it
Anyway im not trying to defend everything
One of the groundsmen at Chequers has been sentenced to 26 months for affray and other charges. Not his first time involved with the law, but it's reported he's still keeping his job when he get's out.
Sort it out Starmer you wet lettuce
'Keir where are you, the Cobra meeting started 5 minutes ago?!'
'Sorry just finishing my Rimming of The Donald. He said if I satisfy him he will met me speak next time”
This guy absolutely should be sacked, but it is absolutely nothing to do with Starmer.
What’s the summary?The Chinese Spy incident will be one of the many nails in Starmers coffin not this
nah, not based on the evidence that has actually been releasedThe Chinese Spy incident will be one of the many nails in Starmers coffin not this
The people who work at ChequersWhat decision do we think starmer is responsible for?