Officiating (14 Viewers)

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
It was a fucking disgrace. Lampard looks fuming and he needs to take the fine and have a pop. Same last year, same this year.

Completely spoilt the game.
 

Nick

Administrator
What can he do about the time wasting realistically?

When they fake injuries he has no options. He was actually pretty hot on stuff otherwise.
Behave 😂 hot on what?

Their keeper had it in his hands. He stopped they game for him. He then let him hold it for another 10 seconds.
 

Nick

Administrator
Because he faked an injury? What else can he do lol

Not stand and watch him hold it for a further ten seconds .

Even ignoring time wasting, he was fucking terrible.

That free kick he gave against tats. The one against dasilva.

He did everything he could to kill the game as much as possible.

He watched their player go down injured by the byline, get up, run to the centre circle to go down injured again.

He watched the players they were taking off walk across the whole pitch rather than telling them to go off at the nearest point.

Real time it looked like a red for the challenge on Thomas and the offside for the disallowed goal was close. Not seen them back though.

He had no control of the game and ended up wasting more time for them by fucking about making it about him.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
Not stand and watch him hold it for a further ten seconds .

Even ignoring time wasting, he was fucking terrible.

That free kick he gave against tats. The one against dasilva.

He did everything he could to kill the game as much as possible.

He watched their player go down injured by the byline, get up, run to the centre circle to go down injured again.
The one against Dasilva was a clear foul 🤣

He really wasn’t that bad. Was it 3 bookings they got for time wasting? And added 9 mins on. As I said, he hasn’t got that many more options.
 

Nick

Administrator
The one against Dasilva was a clear foul 🤣

He really wasn’t that bad. Was it 3 bookings they got for time wasting? And added 9 mins on. As I said, he hasn’t got that many more options.

So if that was a clear foul, why wasn't it when their striker did the same on Thomas?

They got 2 bookings for time wasting in the first half but only 3 minutes added time.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
The one against Dasilva was a clear foul 🤣

He really wasn’t that bad. Was it 3 bookings they got for time wasting? And added 9 mins on. As I said, he hasn’t got that many more options.

He was fucking dogshit.
And they wasted about 2 minutes of the 9 and he added about 15 seconds.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
So if that was a clear foul, why wasn't it when their striker did the same on Thomas?

They got 2 bookings for time wasting in the first half but only 3 minutes added time.
3 minutes was fair 🤣 calm down lol

Ref didn’t affect the result, if Wright and co had their shooting boots on we win 3/4-1
 

Nick

Administrator
3 minutes was fair 🤣 calm down lol

Ref didn’t affect the result, if Wright and co had their shooting boots on we win 3/4-1
How was it fair if they had 2 bookings for time wasting, that was after the multiple warnings they had and a goal.

Yeah the ref wasn't to blame for missing chances. I didn't say he was. Shit argument.

Never know how it would change the result if there wasn't a ref trying to kill the game at every chance he could and enable them to waste even more time.
 

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
It doesn't help when teams put in performances like Norwich did today. It's cheating.

If a keeper feigns injury, what can the referee do?

Need retrospective action and fines for excessive gamesmanship. They were time-wasting from 20 minutes. It's pathetic really, from a team that should be fighting for the playoffs.
 

Nick

Administrator
It doesn't help when teams put in performances like Norwich did today. It's cheating.

If a keeper feigns injury, what can the referee do?

Need retrospective action and fines for excessive gamesmanship. They were time-wasting from 20 minutes. It's pathetic really, from a team that should be fighting for the playoffs.

He should play on rather than stopping the game for him.

If the keeper wants to pretend he's injured when the ball is in play (in his hands) then don't stop the game. Count how long and deal with it.

Instead, he lets him hold it for a while. Then he stops the game for him, then he lets him hold it some more before kicking it.

He was never ever going to give a second booking for time wasting and they knew that.
 

SKYBLUES90

Well-Known Member
Even if they’d of got the 3 points you’d be embarrassed being a Norwich fan after that.

Travelling 3 hours to watch your physio be the man of the match. Shocking.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
He should play on rather than stopping the game for him.

If the keeper wants to pretend he's injured when the ball is in play (in his hands) then don't stop the game. Count how long and deal with it.

Instead, he lets him hold it for a while. Then he stops the game for him, then he lets him hold it some more before kicking it.

He was never ever going to give a second booking for time wasting and they knew that.
Play on with an injury to the keeper? 🤣
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Yes. If the game is stopped it should be an automatic sub. I honestly don’t believe there are any injuries that are healed on the pitch. You either take a rest while the game carries on or you go off. It’s getting ridiculous now.

Would stop the cheating immediately.
 

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
He should play on rather than stopping the game for him.

If the keeper wants to pretend he's injured when the ball is in play (in his hands) then don't stop the game. Count how long and deal with it.

Instead, he lets him hold it for a while. Then he stops the game for him, then he lets him hold it some more before kicking it.
They won't do that.

If it turned out a ref ignored a genuine injury to a keeper they'd be busted down before you could blink.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Yes. If the game is stopped it should be an automatic sub. I honestly don’t believe there are any injuries that are healed on the pitch. You either take a rest while the game carries on or you go off. It’s getting ridiculous now.
Anything that encourages keepers to play on through a genuine injury is a non-starter on player welfare grounds.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Anything that encourages keepers to play on through a genuine injury is a non-starter on player welfare grounds.

There are no genuine injuries like this. If the keeper is injured and needs to come off then they can be subbed that’s what that’s there for. Otherwise fuck it let’s stop the game for nine months while an ACL heals. The idea physios are treating serious injuries and players are playing on is complete nonsense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top