Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Officiating (18 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Yesterday at 5:04 PM
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:04 PM
  • #1
Think anything will be done?

Today was laughable. He played along with their game to time waste.
 
Reactions: brizzle, Sky_Blue_Dreamer, no_loyalty and 4 others

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Yesterday at 5:05 PM
  • #2
Nothing will be done, but it was absolutely horrendous.
 
Reactions: Londonccfcfan, no_loyalty, AOM and 8 others

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:05 PM
  • #3
It was a fucking disgrace. Lampard looks fuming and he needs to take the fine and have a pop. Same last year, same this year.

Completely spoilt the game.
 
Reactions: Londonccfcfan

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:07 PM
  • #4
What can he do about the time wasting realistically?

When they fake injuries he has no options. He was actually pretty hot on stuff otherwise.
 
Reactions: Briles

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:07 PM
  • #5
Pathetic that nobody can say anything without getting in trouble.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:07 PM
  • #6
Nick said:
Think anything will be done?

Today was laughable. He played along with their game to time waste.
Click to expand...
Yeah felt about as bad as ive ever seen up there .. narcissistic little c**t
 
Reactions: procdoc, brizzle, TomRad85 and 1 other person

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:08 PM
  • #7
skybluecam said:
What can he do about the time wasting realistically?

When they fake injuries he has no options. He was actually pretty hot on stuff otherwise.
Click to expand...
Behave hot on what?

Their keeper had it in his hands. He stopped they game for him. He then let him hold it for another 10 seconds.
 
Reactions: brizzle

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:10 PM
  • #8
Nick said:
Behave hot on what?

Their keeper had it in his hands. He stopped they game for him. He then let him hold it for another 10 seconds.
Click to expand...
Because he faked an injury? What else can he do lol
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:11 PM
  • #9
Not sure what was worse, the officiating or our finishing.
 
Reactions: RegiswasGod and eastwoodsdustman

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:11 PM
  • #10
skybluecam said:
Because he faked an injury? What else can he do lol
Click to expand...

Not stand and watch him hold it for a further ten seconds .

Even ignoring time wasting, he was fucking terrible.

That free kick he gave against tats. The one against dasilva.

He did everything he could to kill the game as much as possible.

He watched their player go down injured by the byline, get up, run to the centre circle to go down injured again.

He watched the players they were taking off walk across the whole pitch rather than telling them to go off at the nearest point.

Real time it looked like a red for the challenge on Thomas and the offside for the disallowed goal was close. Not seen them back though.

He had no control of the game and ended up wasting more time for them by fucking about making it about him.
 
Reactions: brizzle, rob9872, robbiethemole and 1 other person

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:13 PM
  • #11
That Ward has always been the same.
 
Reactions: I_Saw_Shaw_Score

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:14 PM
  • #12
Nick said:
Not stand and watch him hold it for a further ten seconds .

Even ignoring time wasting, he was fucking terrible.

That free kick he gave against tats. The one against dasilva.

He did everything he could to kill the game as much as possible.

He watched their player go down injured by the byline, get up, run to the centre circle to go down injured again.
Click to expand...
The one against Dasilva was a clear foul

He really wasn’t that bad. Was it 3 bookings they got for time wasting? And added 9 mins on. As I said, he hasn’t got that many more options.
 
Reactions: SAJ, Adge and eastwoodsdustman

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:16 PM
  • #13
skybluecam said:
The one against Dasilva was a clear foul

He really wasn’t that bad. Was it 3 bookings they got for time wasting? And added 9 mins on. As I said, he hasn’t got that many more options.
Click to expand...

So if that was a clear foul, why wasn't it when their striker did the same on Thomas?

They got 2 bookings for time wasting in the first half but only 3 minutes added time.
 
Reactions: clint van damme

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:17 PM
  • #14
skybluecam said:
The one against Dasilva was a clear foul

He really wasn’t that bad. Was it 3 bookings they got for time wasting? And added 9 mins on. As I said, he hasn’t got that many more options.
Click to expand...

He was fucking dogshit.
And they wasted about 2 minutes of the 9 and he added about 15 seconds.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:17 PM
  • #15
Nick said:
So if that was a clear foul, why wasn't it when their striker did the same on Thomas?

They got 2 bookings for time wasting in the first half but only 3 minutes added time.
Click to expand...
3 minutes was fair calm down lol

Ref didn’t affect the result, if Wright and co had their shooting boots on we win 3/4-1
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:18 PM
  • #16
skybluecam said:
3 minutes was fair calm down lol

Ref didn’t affect the result, if Wright and co had their shooting boots on we win 3/4-1
Click to expand...

Whether he affected the result or not is immaterial, he was fucking useless.
 
Reactions: SwanLane

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:19 PM
  • #17
skybluecam said:
3 minutes was fair calm down lol

Ref didn’t affect the result, if Wright and co had their shooting boots on we win 3/4-1
Click to expand...
How was it fair if they had 2 bookings for time wasting, that was after the multiple warnings they had and a goal.

Yeah the ref wasn't to blame for missing chances. I didn't say he was. Shit argument.

Never know how it would change the result if there wasn't a ref trying to kill the game at every chance he could and enable them to waste even more time.
 
Reactions: clint van damme

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:20 PM
  • #18
It doesn't help when teams put in performances like Norwich did today. It's cheating.

If a keeper feigns injury, what can the referee do?

Need retrospective action and fines for excessive gamesmanship. They were time-wasting from 20 minutes. It's pathetic really, from a team that should be fighting for the playoffs.
 
Reactions: skybluegod

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:23 PM
  • #19
Shannerz said:
It doesn't help when teams put in performances like Norwich did today. It's cheating.

If a keeper feigns injury, what can the referee do?

Need retrospective action and fines for excessive gamesmanship. They were time-wasting from 20 minutes. It's pathetic really, from a team that should be fighting for the playoffs.
Click to expand...

He should play on rather than stopping the game for him.

If the keeper wants to pretend he's injured when the ball is in play (in his hands) then don't stop the game. Count how long and deal with it.

Instead, he lets him hold it for a while. Then he stops the game for him, then he lets him hold it some more before kicking it.

He was never ever going to give a second booking for time wasting and they knew that.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:23 PM
  • #20
He really was awful today and I’m pretty forgiving when it comes to refs.
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm, TomRad85 and Sick Boy

SKYBLUES90

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:28 PM
  • #21
Even if they’d of got the 3 points you’d be embarrassed being a Norwich fan after that.

Travelling 3 hours to watch your physio be the man of the match. Shocking.
 
Reactions: letsallsingtogether

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:28 PM
  • #22
skybluecam said:
What can he do about the time wasting realistically?

When they fake injuries he has no options. He was actually pretty hot on stuff otherwise.
Click to expand...

Add more stoppage time and book players. Don't be afraid to book the keeper for a second time.
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm, Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Shannerz

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:29 PM
  • #23
Until someone gets sent off for time wasting nothing will change.
 
Reactions: SwanLane, Sky Blue Pete, Terry Gibson's perm and 4 others

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:30 PM
  • #24
pusbccfc said:
Add more stoppage time and book players. Don't be afraid to book the keeper for a second time.
Click to expand...
He would never have had the bottle
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm, shmmeee and pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:30 PM
  • #25
60 full minutes and stop the clock whenever a team has/fakes an injury.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and SlovakSkyBlue

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:32 PM
  • #26
I was expecting him to disallow the goal was well. Mve tackle was the same as tats.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and Terry Gibson's perm

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:33 PM
  • #27
Nick said:
He should play on rather than stopping the game for him.

If the keeper wants to pretend he's injured when the ball is in play (in his hands) then don't stop the game. Count how long and deal with it.

Instead, he lets him hold it for a while. Then he stops the game for him, then he lets him hold it some more before kicking it.

He was never ever going to give a second booking for time wasting and they knew that.
Click to expand...
Play on with an injury to the keeper?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:34 PM
  • #28
skybluecam said:
Play on with an injury to the keeper?
Click to expand...
If the ball is in play like it was in that instance, yes.

Or every time the keeper gets an injury from a gust of wind and gets treatment, the captain goes off.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:37 PM
  • #29
Nick said:
I was expecting him to disallow the goal was well. Mve tackle was the same as tats.
Click to expand...

Same, but thankfully not. It's an unbelievable tackle.
 
Reactions: Nick

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:37 PM
  • #30
skybluecam said:
Play on with an injury to the keeper?
Click to expand...

Yes. If the game is stopped it should be an automatic sub. I honestly don’t believe there are any injuries that are healed on the pitch. You either take a rest while the game carries on or you go off. It’s getting ridiculous now.
 
Reactions: robbiekeane, Sky Blue Pete and pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:37 PM
  • #31
shmmeee said:
Yes. If the game is stopped it should be an automatic sub. I honestly don’t believe there are any injuries that are healed on the pitch. You either take a rest while the game carries on or you go off. It’s getting ridiculous now.
Click to expand...

Would stop the cheating immediately.
 
Reactions: shmmeee

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:40 PM
  • #32
Nick said:
He should play on rather than stopping the game for him.

If the keeper wants to pretend he's injured when the ball is in play (in his hands) then don't stop the game. Count how long and deal with it.

Instead, he lets him hold it for a while. Then he stops the game for him, then he lets him hold it some more before kicking it.
Click to expand...
They won't do that.

If it turned out a ref ignored a genuine injury to a keeper they'd be busted down before you could blink.
 
Reactions: Adge and skybluecam
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:41 PM
  • #33
shmmeee said:
Yes. If the game is stopped it should be an automatic sub. I honestly don’t believe there are any injuries that are healed on the pitch. You either take a rest while the game carries on or you go off. It’s getting ridiculous now.
Click to expand...
Anything that encourages keepers to play on through a genuine injury is a non-starter on player welfare grounds.
 
Reactions: skybluecam

Nick

Administrator
  • Yesterday at 5:41 PM
  • #34
Shannerz said:
They won't do that.

If it turned out a ref ignored a genuine injury to a keeper they'd be busted down before you could blink.
Click to expand...

Why? If it's not a head injury then the game isn't stopped for outfield players when the ball is in play.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 5:42 PM
  • #35
SBT said:
Anything that encourages keepers to play on through a genuine injury is a non-starter on player welfare grounds.
Click to expand...

There are no genuine injuries like this. If the keeper is injured and needs to come off then they can be subbed that’s what that’s there for. Otherwise fuck it let’s stop the game for nine months while an ACL heals. The idea physios are treating serious injuries and players are playing on is complete nonsense.
 
Reactions: robbiekeane and KNSB
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • SeaSeeEffCee6 minutes ago
  • robbiethemole6 minutes ago
  • ovduk789 minutes ago
  • Liammm12 minutes ago
  • Merseyskyblue13 minutes ago
  • Terry Gibson's perm13 minutes ago
  • ... and 2 more.
  • Total: 18 (members: 8, guests: 10)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?