Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Nouble and Samuel (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Otis
  • Start date Mar 1, 2015
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #1
Just putting it out there ......


Anyone think they might make for a good front two partnership?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #2
Yes .. i actually rate nouble and think this is our best front 2 tbh
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #3
Two of a front seven, maybe.
 
J

johnwillomagic

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #4
I don't think the Tudguy/Samuel partnership has looked bad to be honest - four goals from two games, if it ain't broke don't fix it!
I quite like Nouble to come off the bench as an impact player.....he's only just got fit anyhow and gives him kick up the backside
which he seems to need. Not done enough to extend his contract with us beyond the end of season ....yet......I still think it is in his interest
to improve this season though so think we will see some golden moments from the lad.....I hope so anyhow!!
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #5
johnwillomagic said:
I don't think the Tudguy/Samuel partnership has looked bad to be honest - four goals from two games, if it ain't broke don't fix it!
I quite like Nouble to come off the bench as an impact player.....he's only just got fit anyhow and gives him kick up the backside
which he seems to need. Not done enough to extend his contract with us beyond the end of season ....yet......I still think it is in his interest
to improve this season though so think we will see some golden moments from the lad.....I hope so anyhow!!
Click to expand...

Agreed. I'm not overly convinced by Nouble but I think he would be a great impact player off the bench. Tudguy and Samuel seemed to work yesterday.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 
S

steveecov

New Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #6
I'd ask Samuels choice and run with that; it's obvious which of the 2 carries the threat.
 

skybluebeduff

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #7
I'd rather Nouble didn't play, hardly likely to earn a new contract is he? get rid.
 
J

johnwillomagic

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #8
I agree Steve Tudgay does carry more threat and has better goals per minutes played ratio this season.....plus
Samuels is scoring goals playing off/alongside him.....take it that's what you meant!
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #9
With a Tony Mowbray pushing them they will all do better will have to or else, one thing he won't put up with is idlers. Remember Mowbray as a player tough as teak at centre half.
 
Last edited: Mar 1, 2015
S

steveecov

New Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #10
rupert_bear said:
With a Tony Mowbray pushing them they will all do better, one thing he won't put up with is idlers
Click to expand...

See Ya Frank.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #11
I thought Tudgay worked hard yesterday, but that was about it. I didn't think he offered much else at all and he lacks pace.

I think Nouble's strength combined with Samuel's pace could just work.
 

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #12
Is Samuel under contract with reading or is it up in the summer looks a cracking prospect
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #13
Otis said:
I thought Tudgay worked hard yesterday, but that was about it. I didn't think he offered much else at all and he lacks pace.

I think Nouble's strength combined with Samuel's pace could just work.
Click to expand...

I feel Nouble likes to drop too deep(more like an attacking midfielder than a striker) to get on the ball and Samuel benefits from someone playing further up the pitch occupying defenders. Tudguy was instrumental for the first, in his part played in getting Samuel away which led to the corner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 
Last edited: Mar 1, 2015

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #14
Still not at all convinced by Tudgay. He seems to be on a terminal decline from his heady days, when I used to really rated him.

Maybe it's time for us to go out into the market and bring another striker in.
 
W

woody11462

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #15
higgs said:
Is Samuel under contract with reading or is it up in the summer looks a cracking prospect
Click to expand...

No, he's under contract. Think he's quite well thought of there.
 
B

_brian_

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #16
Otis said:
Still not at all convinced by Tudgay. He seems to be on a terminal decline from his heady days, when I used to really rated him.

Maybe it's time for us to go out into the market and bring another striker in.
Click to expand...

You've got to be joking, mate?!?! We've got loads of strikers!!!
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #17
_brian_ said:
You've got to be joking, mate?!?! We've got loads of strikers!!!
Click to expand...

We've missed you brain, have you been prepping your CV for the manager's job?
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #18
woody11462 said:
No, he's under contract. Think he's quite well thought of there.
Click to expand...

Wrong he's out of contract at the moment, I think they will probably offer him a new contract though. From reading online I know most of them want him to be offered a new deal.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #19
_brian_ said:
You've got to be joking, mate?!?! We've got loads of strikers!!!
Click to expand...


We have Brian, but they're not good enough. I reckon we need another eleventy billion just to give us complete coverage.
 
L

logjoe

New Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #20
I thought Proschwitz linked up very well with Samuels yesterday. I also wish lee burge would have got the ball up the filed sooner both players were waving and pushing they are a good fit better than Nouble i'm afraid
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #21
I think Nouble could be the one in the partnership to bring the ball down and play it for Samuel to run onto. Last couple of games we've seen what he can do, albeit yesterday he fluffed his best chance but went on to make up for it.

tudgay works hard, just not sure if he's what we need when we're struggling for goals
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #22
logjoe said:
I thought Proschwitz linked up very well with Samuels yesterday. I also wish lee burge would have got the ball up the filed sooner both players were waving and pushing they are a good fit better than Nouble i'm afraid
Click to expand...

Shown a few good touches, but difficult to assess whether he'll be useful or not.

had one opportunity to do something good with it, and think it ended up being passed back to the CB's which was disappointing
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #23
sw88 said:
I think Nouble could be the one in the partnership to bring the ball down and play it for Samuel to run onto. Last couple of games we've seen what he can do, albeit yesterday he fluffed his best chance but went on to make up for it.

[b[tudgay works hard, just not sure if he's what we need when we're struggling for goals[/b]
Click to expand...

Remind me of Nouble's record again??



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #24
Nouble is shit
 
S

steveecov

New Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #25
M&B Stand said:
Nouble is shit
Click to expand...

He ain't that good.
 

Gint11

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #26
I like nouble. If I was the new manager id want Samuel permanently and I still think a Mowbray could turn jacksons attitude around. Play 3 up top with them as Mowbray is attacking isn't bad option


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

WONDERLAMPS

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #27
Gint11 said:
I like nouble. If I was the new manager id want Samuel permanently and I still think a Mowbray could turn jacksons attitude around. Play 3 up top with them as Mowbray is attacking isn't bad option


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

0 chance of Samuel permanently. Highly thought of at Reading.
 

daib0

New Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #28
FRY-CCFC said:
0 chance of Samuel permanently. Highly thought of at Reading.
Click to expand...

yep, as I said on the previous thread on Dominic many Royals fans see him as a great championship/premier future prospect and were pushing for him in our starting XI lineup before the loan deal came about. I think his medium prospects are at Reading ... but maybe a season long next season loan could be considered if mutually convenient. That's just an inkling though, I don't know anything officially.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #29
sw88 said:
tudgay works hard, just not sure if he's what we need when we're struggling for goals
Click to expand...

Uhh ... remember the Scunthorpe game ... 90th minute equaliser ... by Tudgay?
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #30
daib0 said:
yep, as I said on the previous thread on Dominic many Royals fans see him as a great championship/premier future prospect and were pushing for him in our starting XI lineup before the loan deal came about. I think his medium prospects are at Reading ... but maybe a season long next season loan could be considered if mutually convenient. That's just an inkling though, I don't know anything officially.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, he's the kind of player we get rid of, not the kind of player we sign.
 
B

_brian_

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #31
Deleted member 5849 said:
We've missed you brain, have you been prepping your CV for the manager's job?
Click to expand...

Which manager's job?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #32
_brian_ said:
Which manager's job?
Click to expand...

Oldham's


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #33
logjoe said:
I thought Proschwitz linked up very well with Samuels yesterday. I also wish lee burge would have got the ball up the filed sooner both players were waving and pushing they are a good fit better than Nouble i'm afraid
Click to expand...

Proschwitz took me back to the heady days of Tommy Langley.

He looked shocking.
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #34
Gazolba said:
Uhh ... remember the Scunthorpe game ... 90th minute equaliser ... by Tudgay?
Click to expand...

Remember it well.

But I meant quantity of goals, rather than specific goals.

Don't get me wrong he's done an alright job since coming back into the team, just not prolific enough
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • #35
sw88 said:
Remember it well.

But I meant quantity of goals, rather than specific goals.

Don't get me wrong he's done an alright job since coming back into the team, just not prolific enough
Click to expand...

Neither is nouble, Jackson or Miller, thank god we have Samuel as he's the one player that might save us from relegation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
 
Last edited: Mar 1, 2015
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?