Are you happy with the new training wear or do you think the staff should hunt and kill animals to create their own furs?
Is there a specific level of technology or maybe period in time you’d be happy with?
Is there a specific level of technology or maybe period in time you’d be happy with?
I had added to the post
”In truth the iPads are emblematic of changes which do not seem to have benefited results”
That's not relevant.
What's relevant is that we got rid in the first place.
But we didn’t did we? The official stance was he took on a new role.
it’s only Gimoc who’s spouting the “we got rid” stance and his take on the clubs business is sketchy at best
We didnt "get rid". He was headhunted. I've also heard he was offered Adi's job.
Manager Mark Robins said: “I would like to thank Dennis for his hard work and important contribution to the success that we have experienced over the last few years, during which he has been a popular and integral part of our team.
“It is an incredible opportunity for Dennis and his family that it would have been difficult not to have taken, and he leaves us with our best wishes for his new role at Minnesota United and for the future.”
“It is an incredible opportunity for Dennis and his family that it would have been difficult not to have taken, and he leaves us with our best wishes for his new role at Minnesota United and for the future.”
I mean, why can't people just grasp he got a better job closer to home.
You sure you didn't just copy what Esoterica said on here yesterday
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
The official stance could well be bollocks.
And it's not only gimoc though I can't say it's certain we got rid of him but given what's gone on subsequently its not hard to believe
That totally contradicts what Henry Winter said the opinion of Robins is within the EFL.
No, it's fucking SB as well who posts bullshit for clout
So you have the word of someone desperate to still be seen as an ITK and someone who posts nonsense about DK because he put the price of his mates exec box up.
Don't listen to people on the forum
Do listen to people on the forum
Lawrence got a better job
Viveash could of been let go for non football reasons
We sold or let go older players that aren't good enough
We tried to use the load market, we had a player joining on load but he then got injured.
Said it on another post but I don’t get the structure of the club.
There’s Head Coach, Performance Director then Head of Recruitment. Are they all equal or is one above the others? In that sort of setup I’d expect a director of football but looks like they all report to Doug independently; Doug who admits he doesn’t know much about football.
Recruitment so far looks poor. Energy levels, injuries and hitting the ground running this season hasn’t happened so performance director doesn’t look like they are hitting target. Then the on pitch performances, formations, substitutions haven’t given us results so coach has lost his job.
If we put a new coach in with the current setup does he instantly carry the can if he’s had to work with the staff we’ve got or do we then look at the other leadership roles.
There’s Head Coach, Performance Director then Head of Recruitment. Are they all equal or is one above the others? In that sort of setup I’d expect a director of football but looks like they all report to Doug independently; Doug who admits he doesn’t know much about football.
Recruitment so far looks poor. Energy levels, injuries and hitting the ground running this season hasn’t happened so performance director doesn’t look like they are hitting target. Then the on pitch performances, formations, substitutions haven’t given us results so coach has lost his job.
If we put a new coach in with the current setup does he instantly carry the can if he’s had to work with the staff we’ve got or do we then look at the other leadership roles.
Last edited:
Thats been my nagging worry also. I didn't want him sacked, but it was clear we was struggling, granted a lot down to all the off field change especially.
BUT he as never managed at this level, with this expectation and thats the concern.
The head coach should be a level down as they normally report into a SD/FOD
So one minute you're saying don't believe the ITKs on the forum.
Then I respond to one with a quote from a journalist and you're siding with the ITK, (or seemed to be)
he wasn’t offered a new contract
if you’ve not been offered a new contract you leave
I know for some that’s hard to grasp but that’s the reality
what’s aired in public isn’t necessary what happens behind the scenes
from a missed pen
could have been so different
the new changes have been made and it’s gone downwards since
Yes it’s gone downwards but it’s not the fault of iPads is it? Come on it’s ludicrous
I simply said I will take the views of a non cov supporting journalist who thinks we played well against QPR with a pinch of salt
Some of the criticism of her is clearly gendered though. The appointment of a former Premier League executive to oversee sports science at the club should hardly be considered a controversial appointment, but people are still questioning her credentials. There’s an inherent mistrust and doubt about her role not only because it’s coincided with a dip in form, but also because she’s a woman working in a business that almost always hires men. I’m not saying that’s the world’s greatest injustice, nor am I saying she should be immune from criticism over the things she controls, but I don’t thing you can totally ignore that aspect either.