Nick I want PSGM1 unbanned (2 Viewers)

CCFC_GT

New Member
I would say it is probably in his own best health interests that he remains banned ... he needs to seek help and have time to recuperate.

Shame Hatton Hospital has been closed.
 

Senior Vick from Alicante

Well-Known Member
He needs to concentrate on the issues and stop endlessly attacking the trust in every post, freedom of speach is great but you can't use the threads to push your own agenda or grievance.
 

skybluepm2

Well-Known Member
I think the guys are right Nick. As much as he is a 1st class penis, I would love to hear his views on yesterday's success. Hear what he has to say and then get rid of him again. He will never eat humble pie but it will be funny to read what he has to say! :)
 

Greggs

Well-Known Member
Maybe still amongst us....under a different alias maybe?
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
He needs to concentrate on the issues and stop endlessly attacking the trust in every post, freedom of speach is great but you can't use the threads to push your own agenda or grievance.

So freedom of speech is only good if it suits your own agenda then? The Trust are made up of grown men, I'm sure they can handle a bit of negative feedback just as much as they can handle the deserved positive feedback from yesterday.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
Sequels prequels remakes and reboots usually are, Karate Kid and Rambo being the prime examples!
Rocky 4 was good though!

Aliens and Godfather were not too shody!
 

Jim

Well-Known Member
Negative feedback is one thing but a constant tirade of unwarranted and unfounded abuse of everything the trust (clique...?) do is something else entirely.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
Aliens v Godfathers was though.

Who ever thought they could make a boxing movie about the Martian Mafia.

Sent from my KIS using Tapatalk 2

You aliens will be sleepin with the fishes.
 

Nick

Administrator
So freedom of speech is only good if it suits your own agenda then? The Trust are made up of grown men, I'm sure they can handle a bit of negative feedback just as much as they can handle the deserved positive feedback from yesterday.

No it wasn't that he didn't agree with the trust, it is the fact he crossed the line despite numerous warnings and posted harsh personal attacks. I asked him about 15 times to stop with personal attacks and to just put his point across but he didn't grasp the fact.

Not agreeing with somebody is fine, launching into bursts of personal attacks isn't...
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
Negative feedback is one thing but a constant tirade of unwarranted and unfounded abuse of everything the trust (clique...?) do is something else entirely.

Took me ages to work out who he was talking about when he mentioned the Clique, was worried he might have taken to the booze e.g. the Veuve Clicquot.
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
No it wasn't that he didn't agree with the trust, it is the fact he crossed the line despite numerous warnings and posted harsh personal attacks. I asked him about 15 times to stop with personal attacks and to just put his point across but he didn't grasp the fact.

Not agreeing with somebody is fine, launching into bursts of personal attacks isn't...

Fair enough.

I quite liked his meltdowns though.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
I just loved the reactions he got off most people, it was entertaining!! I agree though there is no need for personal attacks on people or the trust.
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
If you cross a line where by you continually throw personal abuse then you deserve a cooling off period.
Perhaps he will be allowed back to criticise as much as he likes but without the quite so heavy use of personal vicious insults.
 
I was amused at first with his ramblings and rants but I'm afraid it became, in my opinion, on the verge of cyber bullying, even if the perceived targets did not see this themselves. As has been said in some posts above, some of the language was quite vicious.
 

Nick

Administrator
As said I asked him plenty of times to just put his point across without the personal attacks, but they just weren't on.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top