Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

new statement (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter skybluesam66
  • Start date Mar 5, 2019
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 6 of 12 Next Last
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #176
shmmeee said:
No it can’t. It can be your opinion that it does, but the future is not certain. It can be likely, but not a fact.

Say I killed you today, you could argue that’s a fact that you won’t be alive next week. But we could invent reversing death this weekend and bring you back, we don’t know for sure. Very unlikely, but not a fact.

Yes I’m being a pedant, but so is the law.
Click to expand...
I was with you until the ludicrous example!
 
Reactions: shmmeee

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #177
shmmeee said:
No it can’t. It can be your opinion that it does, but the future is not certain. It can be likely, but not a fact.

Say I killed you today, you could argue that’s a fact that you won’t be alive next week. But we could invent reversing death this weekend and bring you back, we don’t know for sure. Very unlikely, but not a fact.

Yes I’m being a pedant, but so is the law.
Click to expand...

So how do people get sent down for murder if death might be reversible this weekend?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #178
Nick said:
So how do people get sent down for murder if death might be reversible this weekend?
Click to expand...

Because the murder still happened
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #179
shmmeee said:
Because the murder still happened
Click to expand...
Not if they are alive.

I get your point but when something is bang on guaranteed it's a bit more than opinion isn't it.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #180
Nick said:
Not if they are alive.

I get your point but when something is bang on guaranteed it's a bit more than opinion isn't it.
Click to expand...

Yes. Even if they are alive. The act of murder still happened even if it was reversed. (NW is right this is a fucking terrible example)

And no, it’s a well informed opinion but still an opinion.
 
Reactions: Nick

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #181
Liquid Gold said:
The source of the problem isn’t fans but we help perpetuate the problems.
Click to expand...
The supporters do not in any way help perpetuate anything relating to the ongoing issues of stadium ownership / lease. The problem for our supporters is that due to the complexity of the issue with SISUWasps/Council there are so many groups who have contributed to our demise that almost inevitably we can't unite over one single course of action.
Don't blame our supporters for this .
 
Reactions: clint van damme and shmmeee

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #182
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
The supporters do not in any way help perpetuate anything relating to the ongoing issues of stadium ownership / lease. The problem for our supporters is that due to the complexity of the issue with SISUWasps/Council there are so many groups who have contributed to our demise that almost inevitably we can't unite over one single course of action.
Don't blame our supporters for this .
Click to expand...
If we haven’t played any part in this then we have fuck all influence and no matter what we do it will never matter.

That’s a pretty negative way to look at things.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #183
Liquid Gold said:
If we haven’t played any part in this then we have fuck all influence and no matter what we do it will never matter.

That’s a pretty negative way to look at things.
Click to expand...

Now you’re getting it!
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #184
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
The supporters do not in any way help perpetuate anything relating to the ongoing issues of stadium ownership / lease. The problem for our supporters is that due to the complexity of the issue with SISUWasps/Council there are so many groups who have contributed to our demise that almost inevitably we can't unite over one single course of action.
Don't blame our supporters for this .
Click to expand...

Most supporters fantasise of worlds without SISU and Wasps. On the Wasps forum we are made out to be deranged SISU fans. Not true. We want both gone
 
Reactions: Nick

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #185
Liquid Gold said:
If we haven’t played any part in this then we have fuck all influence and no matter what we do it will never matter.

That’s a pretty negative way to look at things.
Click to expand...
I don't recall saying anything of the sort.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #186
fatso said:
What did you expect the council to do exactly with the empty stadium?
Tim had said the club were leaving to build their own stadium and promptly flounced off to Northampton!
The council were left with 2 clear options.
1, find another tenant.
2, find a buyer.
If you don't understand that, then I really can't help you.
Click to expand...

Three options.

Option 3: Build trust after the club returned and then look to do a deal at a later date. That was actually what the Council said at the point CCFC moved back, at the very point that they were negotiating secretly with Wasps. Another flat out lie.

Just to be clear, the Ricoh wasn't empty when the Council sold to Wasps, that's simply not true.
 
Reactions: Limey and Covstu

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #187
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
I don't recall saying anything of the sort.
Click to expand...
So if we do have influence why have we had no influence on this?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #188
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Most supporters fantasise of worlds without SISU and Wasps. On the Wasps forum we are made out to be deranged SISU fans. Not true. We want both gone
Click to expand...
Wasps fans can piss off back to Kenilworth

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #189
wow, this statement is nuts, it looks like its been penned by the guy who writes the trust ones.

its real kids in a play ground stuff now isn't it,

proper grim
 
Reactions: shmmeee

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #190
ccfcway said:
wow, this statement is nuts, it looks like its been penned by the guy who writes the trust ones.

its real kids in a play ground stuff now isn't it,

proper grim
Click to expand...
It's calling out blatant attempts by the council to mislead in the absence of local media, fans groups or anybody else to do the same
 
Reactions: SkyBlueZack

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #191
Nuneaton go out of business CCFC to take over ground.
Or
Sisu sell and buy Nuneaton take the Smurf to court for charging them rent for a derelict site posing as a football ground.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #192
To think i was naive enough to be excited about burton game in friday
 
Reactions: ccfcrob

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #193
fernandopartridge said:
It's calling out blatant attempts by the council to mislead in the absence of local media, fans groups or anybody else to do the same
Click to expand...

Let’s be blunt here. It’s picking up on a couple of woolly statements from Councillors. It’s not a smoking gun. It’s not any different to any other politician blather.

What matters isn’t comments from individuals if they are to prove a conspiracy, it’s the meetings of and reports to the council as a whole. And that left a loophole big enough to drive a bus through. Because no sane person would sign a lease that forces them to have a tenant at any cost.

I know you desperately want it to be a smoking gun, I get it, a quick Sisu win and this whole thing is behind us. But this ain’t it. Just like it wasn’t it the last ten times either.

This is just an attempt to get pressure on the council, without any actual action they want the council to take. It’s just screaming into the void, the Sisu version of the tiny sky blue coffin.

It’s not enough of a vote winner to impact the council and it’s not solid enough to be legally useful.

What it is is a sign that we likely won’t be playing in Cov next year.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #194
shmmeee said:
Let’s be blunt here. It’s picking up on a couple of woolly statements from Councillors. It’s not a smoking gun. It’s not any different to any other politician blather.

What matters isn’t comments from individuals if they are to prove a conspiracy, it’s the meetings of and reports to the council as a whole. And that left a loophole big enough to drive a bus through. Because no sane person would sign a lease that forces them to have a tenant at any cost.

I know you desperately want it to be a smoking gun, I get it, a quick Sisu win and this whole thing is behind us. But this ain’t it. Just like it wasn’t it the last ten times either.

This is just an attempt to get pressure on the council, without any actual action they want the council to take. It’s just screaming into the void, the Sisu version of the tiny sky blue coffin.

It’s not enough of a vote winner to impact the council and it’s not solid enough to be legally useful.

What it is is a sign that we likely won’t be playing in Cov next year.
Click to expand...

Hmmm whilst you're probably right it's no wonder local elections are not taken seriously
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #195
vow said:
That's twice you've used this phrase, what does it mean?
Click to expand...
Twice! I think it’s four now.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #196
fernandopartridge said:
It's calling out blatant attempts by the council to mislead in the absence of local media, fans groups or anybody else to do the same
Click to expand...

its well worth the club fighting back, no doubt about that, but the "talk is cheap" stuff could easily have been replaced with.....

"I am sure Mr Duggins would agree that the city benefits from having a major football club playing within it. We are calling on him to stand up and be counted and show if he feels it's worth fighting to keep his constituents club in his city"
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #197
covcity4life said:
To think i was naive enough to be excited about burton game in friday
Click to expand...

cc4life was wrong again
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #198
oldskyblue58 said:
Well if you wanted to harden attitudes even further that should do it. Given Boddy said last night the owners would make a statement i assume it is really from them not CCFC. I agree it is not a very professional statement, it is more of a personal attack, i am not sure it helps. Dont get me wrong they have to fight their corner with everything they have so i understand why and that it will play well to the fans & EFL.

I would be surprised if there was a binding clause in the CCC/Wasps sale agreement to basically allow CCFC to stay at their choice as long as they like but i suppose there is a chance. Given what everyone was aware of at the time it would have been careless in the extreme for a lawyer to allow that through.

Added to which there is reference i understand to it being on the basis of being able to strike a commercial deal to be able to stay longer. That i would think is getting more difficult as we go on through this saga. In which case in court i dont think there is much to rely on but i am not a barrister.

In essence Wasps will say there was no contractual basis to go on further, CCFC had wanted a short term deal (lots of press statements about that) and that deal has ended at the term date.

OEG/ARVO/SBS&L as instructed to so by SISU started JR2 after the assurances were given. I am sure some clever lawyer will work that in somewhere as a part of a defense

CCC have made so many mistakes over the years that it encourages legal actions. Do things in secret and this is what results.

Wasps I fear will see that and conclude we can not deal with these people.

The statement does not say to me they have a strong case.

The club statement basically sets the scene for continuing legal actions. As has been said this not about a day in court and "battering" the opposition. This is about battering people with court over and over again to get what they want. What they want (SISU) is not the stadium but the financial settlements that would come because of it. It is not nor ever has been about what is best for CCFC

I think moving away is now more certain and a solution less likely given the egos and entrenched positions
Click to expand...
Don’t matter if we move elsewhere or go tits up! One thing I can guarantee is that SISU will still carry on regardless with their legals
 
Reactions: Nick

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #199
ccfcway said:
cc4life was wrong again
Click to expand...
Not when we win 10 nil
 

Old Warwickshire lad

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #200
Warwickhunt said:
Don’t matter if we move elsewhere or go tits up! One thing I can guarantee is that SISU will still carry on regardless with their legals
Click to expand...
I was talking to a guy who had dealings with SISU ( queue Jim the gateman jokes). He said SISU would never stop the legals because they truly believe they are in the right,and eventually everything will come out and they will win.
We will just be collateral damage.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #201
duffer said:
Three options.

Option 3: Build trust after the club returned and then look to do a deal at a later date. That was actually what the Council said at the point CCFC moved back, at the very point that they were negotiating secretly with Wasps. Another flat out lie.

Just to be clear, the Ricoh wasn't empty when the Council sold to Wasps, that's simply not true.
Click to expand...
'Option 3 was never going to happen because the relationship and trust between the two parties had broken down. By the time ccfc returned all sides were playing games with each other, and neither could be trusted.

Empty or not, the Ricoh arena is untenable without the football club.
It may even fail with wasps as tenants.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #202
covcity4life said:
To think i was naive enough to be excited about burton game in friday
Click to expand...
I am still don't worry!
 
Reactions: covcity4life

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #203
Nick said:
Ah playing the naive act?
Click to expand...
Nick, you have no argument other than calling every side out!
I’ve yet to hear you come out with any rational argument that could be put against the council in court. ( and I’m not defending them I’m pointing out the obvious that you seem unable to grasp)
Sisu are doomed to fail yet again, and the council will walk away vindicated,
Even though they lied to and manipulated the public and sisu over the sale to wasps.
If you have any sane argument to the contrary I’m more than happy to hear it.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #204
fatso said:
Nick, you have no argument other than calling every side out!
I’ve yet to hear you come out with any rational argument that could be put against the council in court. ( and I’m not defending them I’m pointing out the obvious that you seem unable to grasp)
Sisu are doomed to fail yet again, and the council will walk away vindicated,
Even though they lied to and manipulated the public and sisu over the sale to wasps.
If you have any sane argument to the contrary I’m more than happy to hear it.
Click to expand...
I've never said anything about the current case apart from I can't see anything but sisu losing. The court case is judged on one thing isn't it? They aren't judging morals, lies or bullshit.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #205
The Philosopher said:
I said before that SISU missed an opportunity to buy Cov Rugby.

They could have got around lots of council issues, developed the Butts, shared resources (physios, Training facilities, admin. Staff) and at the same time damaged Wasps if CRC became successful. Huge potential.
Click to expand...

That would have been brilliant unfortunately another person who wouldn't deal with Sisu after meeting them wonder why?
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #206
Nick said:
I've never said anything about the current case apart from I can't see anything but sisu losing. The court case is judged on one thing isn't it? They aren't judging morals, lies or bullshit.
Click to expand...
No just the Facts
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #207
shmmeee said:
Let’s be blunt here. It’s picking up on a couple of woolly statements from Councillors. It’s not a smoking gun. It’s not any different to any other politician blather.

What matters isn’t comments from individuals if they are to prove a conspiracy, it’s the meetings of and reports to the council as a whole. And that left a loophole big enough to drive a bus through. Because no sane person would sign a lease that forces them to have a tenant at any cost.

I know you desperately want it to be a smoking gun, I get it, a quick Sisu win and this whole thing is behind us. But this ain’t it. Just like it wasn’t it the last ten times either.

This is just an attempt to get pressure on the council, without any actual action they want the council to take. It’s just screaming into the void, the Sisu version of the tiny sky blue coffin.

It’s not enough of a vote winner to impact the council and it’s not solid enough to be legally useful.

What it is is a sign that we likely won’t be playing in Cov next year.
Click to expand...

The council and wasps will probably do nothing unless SISU drop legals. But the issue is what happens after the supreme court rule. 2 days ago I was optimistic of a deal today I expect a 3rd court case.

Will this nightmare ever end?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #208
letsallsingtogether said:
No just the Facts
Click to expand...

It isn't though, all they care about is whether the sale was legal.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #209
Liquid Gold said:
So if we do have influence why have we had no influence on this?
Click to expand...
I don't know. I didn't say anything of the sort. I was responding to your remarks about our supporters. I'd read it all again.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • #210
fatso said:
'Option 3 was never going to happen because the relationship and trust between the two parties had broken down. By the time ccfc returned all sides were playing games with each other, and neither could be trusted.

Empty or not, the Ricoh arena is untenable without the football club.
It may even fail with wasps as tenants.
Click to expand...

If that wasn't really an option then why did the council say that it was at the point we returned?

In the politest way that I can frame it, you shoot down your own argument here - the fact that you say the Ricoh needs the club shows that there was always a deal to be made... if it wasn't for the shady double dealing with Wasps who knows where we would be now.

The legals would have finished with JR1, and the club (having lost) still wouldn't have built a new ground. A deal would have suited both sides, regardless of their mutual antipathy.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 6 of 12 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?