New stadium (8 Viewers)

SBT

Well-Known Member
I do, it takes seconds to get a definition on Google.

Any article relating to a new stadium always ramps up interest on twitter/forums. It will be the most read article on BBC CWR in months.
Clickbait is when you deliberately make a headline more vague to entice people to click on it in expectation of a bigger story. This isn’t the case here - the story is pretty transparent. If the story ends up being the most read article on CWR, it’s because it’s a good one.
 

long way home

Well-Known Member
Doug wanted the stadium from day 1 for a very good reason and he still does. It would be wise for him to look at every option if he feels that ownership of the stadium is off limits. He now is on a very small timeline to try to get a deal or get outside investment to build a stadium.

Not sure if anything is in the story or its true but common sense would say Doug would of explored the alternatives.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Brace Yourself Here We Go GIF by MOODMAN
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
This pisses me off as a member of the forum
Think the fsa and the new football bill requires a little more transparency from the club over stuff like this and I will be saying so
This requires no transparency at all. They are a privately owned business and it is their business. We are paying consumers not share holders. That is how business works. And confidentiality aka secrecy is very important.

As a bluff to put pressure on frasers it is not very good because our bluff can be too easily called. Frasers would see through it.

Capacity is a problem tho. When doing reasonably well we get sellouts. In the Prem so many of you covet we could do 35k at the bottom end. It may be more because DK wants at some point to sell out and it gives the club future profit growth potential
 

Domo

Well-Known Member
what is the benefit of frasers owning the CBS anyway? ok they get portions of sales etc, but surely being landlords is a pain in the arse?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
It is a bit strange as the club have paid for the pitch, floodlights and turnstyles....

Negotiating tactics.

Sensible to let Mike Ashley know that if pushed, Doug will build a new stadium
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SBT

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Clickbait is when you deliberately make a headline more vague to entice people to click on it in expectation of a bigger story. This isn’t the case here - the story is pretty transparent. If the story ends up being the most read article on CWR, it’s because it’s a good one.

You have just described my feelings as I saw the headline this morning and read the article and Simon's tweets.

I'm not suggesting it's a fake story or that it isn't a good one.
 

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
Plenty of space in Stratford by his other business...
It used to be all Villa out there, don't know what it's like nowadays!

Saying that if there were ever to be a new stadium then Warwickshire Council might be easier to deal with if they could find the right place...
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
This requires no transparency at all. They are a privately owned business and it is their business. We are paying consumers not share holders. That is how business works. And confidentiality aka secrecy is very important.

As a bluff to put pressure on frasers it is not very good because our bluff can be too easily called. Frasers would see through it.

Capacity is a problem tho. When doing reasonably well we get sellouts. In the Prem so many of you covet we could do 35k at the bottom end. It may be more because DK wants at some point to sell out and it gives the club future profit growth potential
Just not true it’s a licence condition to discuss relocation of the stadium


Here’s what it requires clubs to discuss with supporters under the new statutory framework:

🗣️ Mandatory fan consultation topics

Under the Act, clubs are legally required to establish a Fan Advisory Board and carry out periodic consultation with supporters on several critical decisions, including (but not limited to) :
  • Relocation of the stadium
  • Changes to club identity, such as club name, badge/crest, colours
  • Significant financial restructurings
  • Strategic direction and governance
  • Ticket pricing changes (especially key shifts affecting supporter access and loyalty)

📣 Transparency duties in insolvency situations

Moreover, if a regulated club enters insolvency proceedings, it must take reasonable steps to keep supporters informed about the progress of those proceedings

These fan-consultation obligations are not optional—they are licence conditions enforceable through the Independent Football Regulator (IFR). Non‑compliance may result in regulatory penalties, licence conditions or other enforcement actions .

In short, the Act places supporters at the heart of decision-making in their clubs—forcing meaningful dialogue on heritage, identity, location, finances, pricing, and insolvency.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
It is a bit strange as the club have paid for the pitch, floodlights and turnstyles....
It didn’t happen yesterday
It’s been leaked by someone following the forum last Thursday I reckon
It wasn’t me that told the press but I thought about it.
I didn’t as the person that told me asked me not to
 

Nick

Administrator
It didn’t happen yesterday
It’s been leaked by someone following the forum last Thursday I reckon
It wasn’t me that told the press but I thought about it.
I didn’t as the person that told me asked me not to

What, it was said at the forum about speaking to the Council?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top