Astute
Well-Known Member
You certainly do but normally make out that you don't.
What are you on about? Do you know what the word actually means?
What are you on about? Do you know what the word actually means?
You certainly do but normally make out that you don't.
it's clear they're making some sort of case to RBC (and that RBC aren't entirely averse to the idea).
I'd get off that high horse. It's only the last few days you've known how to spell it
What are you on about? Do you know what the word actually means?
Ah you actually don't. You've googled it and misinterpreted the issue - the outstanding loan was not the issue.
It is also worthy of note that there is no evidence this is what they wanted - the only person who said it was washing her face at the time.
What are you on about? Do you know what the word actually means?
Ah you actually don't. You've googled it and misinterpreted the issue - the outstanding loan was not the issue.
It is also worthy of note that there is no evidence this is what they wanted - the only person who said it was washing her face at the time.
Oh look it's another council /wasps chap coming along to assist in the debate.
Manage to get a ticket for the "big one" on Sunday did you?
Now in my view, this is where the bull should be taken by the horns. If one council isn't entirely averse to the idea, neither should be another in the immediate localitySo we have to get over the hurdle of those 'investors'. I'm sure if the case were made, local plans were changed, and bygones were bygones, then said investors could be turned around also...
In itself, it should be encouraging that there might (might!) be an opportunity to keep us in 'Coventry' (the scare quotes for obvious reasons. Ansty, Broadstreet etc. OK, other places rather less so!) as any future owners need options, even if (when) our current ones eventually crash and burn.
There's a lot of sense in this NW, as usual. But I think the game the council played here when selling to Wasps, the simple breathtaking lies that were spouted at the time, might really have broken the relationship. I certainly wouldn't trust them again if I was running the club.
Oh look it's another council /wasps chap coming along to assist in the debate.
Manage to get a ticket for the "big one" on Sunday did you?
What part of 'unanimous' don't you understand?
The problem is, and I'll get in first before anyone else, that's exactly what CCC would say about SISU.
And that's the impasse that causes this, and the impasse that means both forget that like it or not they need each other. But we end up trying to blame so much (and tbf, why not blame now and again!) we sometimes miss that at the moment, there is zero pressure or desire for any CCC local plan to be changed.
And without that, why should they? Forget about specific sites, that's the club's job ultimately (although you'd hope a council would work with them) but some kind of indication the council wouldn't be averse to this, as opposed to the Maton 'there is no suitable site, it's not in the local plan' would be a start, wouldn't it?
Oh look it's another council /wasps chap coming along to assist in the debate.
Manage to get a ticket for the "big one" on Sunday did you?
I think I I've been using Sky Blues message boards for a duration longer than you, or before the council or Wasps were on the scene in any way. As such, your claims in that regard are about as accurate as your claims that Fisher was the best CEO we'd had in years, or SISU were the only game in town.
Ticket for the Leicester game? I wouldn't need a ticket, even if I wanted to go. Don't be silly. Do you want me to pull strings for you?
Hardly I've been offered corporate hospitality.
Yes I was right. You are after a stupid argument again. The last time we were on this you tried to make out that it wasn't unencumbered that Joy was after. Now you say she was having a wash when she said it?
The outstanding loan wasn't the problem? There are enough quotes from SISU that are totally opposite to what you say. But that is nothing unusual.
And you are also being untruthful on something else. Or how can you see my posts and have been able to see them all the time when you said you wouldn't be able to?
Have you any idea how much of a twat you make yourself look?
The problem is, and I'll get in first before anyone else, that's exactly what CCC would say about SISU.
And that's the impasse that causes this, and the impasse that means both forget that like it or not they need each other. But we end up trying to blame so much (and tbf, why not blame now and again!) we sometimes miss that at the moment, there is zero pressure or desire for any CCC local plan to be changed.
And without that, why should they? Forget about specific sites, that's the club's job ultimately (although you'd hope a council would work with them) but some kind of indication the council wouldn't be averse to this, as opposed to the Maton 'there is no suitable site, it's not in the local plan' would be a start, wouldn't it?
For all of that, I think I'm with you. Wouldn't it be a good thing if CCC said "hold up a mo, if you're serious about a new stadium let's talk". They've made such a big fecking deal about how good a franchise (minority) sporting operation is for the city, are they going to watch CCFC potentially leave town without making some sort of effort?
For all of that, I think I'm with you. Wouldn't it be a good thing if CCC said "hold up a mo, if you're serious about a new stadium let's talk". They've made such a big fecking deal about how good a franchise (minority) sporting operation is for the city, are they going to watch CCFC potentially leave town without making some sort of effort?
On that note, I'd love to see CCFC in the championship, with a stadium in the city, and Wasps playing on the same day at the Ricoh. Guess who I think would have to give away the most free tickets.
Hardly I've been offered corporate hospitality.
Unfortunately there is no commentary in the accounts regarding the fluctuations from year to year. Part of it will be because of cup runs (eg Chelsea? (cant remember the year), but also JPT semi would fall in to that ), some will be because of relegation from the Championship so ticket prices, crowds & tv money lower, some will be because prize money and solidarity payments lower in L1, maybe some increase because of the 125 year celebrations? Attendances 2009 and 2010 17k? But like I say we are left to make own reasons as to why
interestingly the figure for 2010 of match 9.29m and commercial 1.66m in the 2010 accounts became match 4.36m and commercial 6.59m in the comparatives in the 2011 accounts.
The argument was centred around securing the freehold without the leases attached to them - the biggest one being acl of course. The council maintained it was impossible to break these leases without adding significant cost to the deal.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&r...vqHAH0nyCFtkw3olA&sig2=5JmBFgKQ3CwyB6_mL1zyrw
Interesting document! Looks like there are a few big sites off the A46
Site S082 is 62 Acres didn't Tim say they were interested in 60 Acres???
'It also emerged during the meeting that the Football League has told the club it should pursue sites within eight miles of Earl Street.'
'Should!'
When my daughter is given homework by her teacher, the teacher says 'You must do your homework!' Not 'You should do your homework.'
If the official word is 'should' then that is rather wishy washy and doesn't at all sound definitive.
S122 'Former' Coventry City Training Ground?!?
Ticket for the Leicester game? I wouldn't need a ticket, even if I wanted to go. Don't be silly. Do you want me to pull strings for you?
as I don't live there, as explained before I don't know the make up of the council, were there any lib dems greens and all the rest represented in the council, what I know it's just Cons and Labour no other.
by getting in parties not represented before or any other new independents then next time it won't go all there own way.
thats my point, and stop being a patronising prick
Cant be arsed to read 25 pages. Can someone summarise in less than 20 words?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?