Sensible that Mowbray is trying to get a new left back in on loan rather than bring Haynes back from Cambridge. Haynes doesn't cut it for me and anyway we have ten games to rescue our season so we need experience and players willing to put their neck on the line for the cause.
In Stokes we had that. My player of the season, hopefully he'll be back sooner rather than later.
I suppose Haynes is Plan B (or Plan C, if you prefer) for if we can't get someone else in....related to the player turnover thread though, there are probably advantages in bringing RH back purely for familiarity / continuity reasons...we've got lots of newish faces in the back 4 already at the moment.
If a player gets injured and our replacement isn't good enough to fill in, then why is he the replacement? Isn't the whole purpose of having a replacement that he can step in when needed? And what message does it sent to that player when we start talking about signing a new replacement?
Brad Smith from Liverpool would probably be available on a short-term loan. He's played, and been impressive, in a couple of their cup matches this season.
Also, you'd like to think Klopp would trust us given we gave Kent a decent spell here.
If a player gets injured and our replacement isn't good enough to fill in, then why is he the replacement? Isn't the whole purpose of having a replacement that he can step in when needed? And what message does it sent to that player when we start talking about signing a new replacement?
Correct why why have all these players in the squad and then never use them and loan players in, it's great saying we have a twenty five man squad but not if only twelve are good enough to play they may as well stuff the squad full of the people on here.
Brad Smith from Liverpool would probably be available on a short-term loan. He's played, and been impressive, in a couple of their cup matches this season.
Also, you'd like to think Klopp would trust us given we gave Kent a decent spell here.