This morning I got to thinking about Covs signing policy for this season. Have we ever taken so many players on trial before signing (or not) before? I think that while we are in our current position this is a great move. There are many unattached players around who could do a job in this league, but knowing who will fit the bill is the biggest challenge.
This lead me to thinking about how much money we must have wasted in recent years signing players who we thought could do a job, but sadly failed to make much of an impression. I realise that this could be a long thread but the ones from recent years who came to mind were:
Freddy Eastwood
Michael McIndoe
Steven O'Halloran
Steven Wright
Clingan (bar his first season)
Baker (yet to live up to his potential)
ROD
Deegan
Kevin Thornton
I Know some of these didn't cost all that much, but i think that showing a little caution with signings is sensible. I (amongst others) was excited by the possible signing of the Brazilian, but it would seem that actually he didn't cut the mustard.
Thoughts?
I think you have a point, Guy. When times are good (erm, probably not the right phrase but you know what I mean) then we can take risks on players...none more so that Dowie and some of the pap he brought in. Also, Strachan went mad on Hondurans for some reason.
Now we are financially hamstrung when it comes to player acquisition, so it's sensible to run the rule over them first. Pointless having Bruno if he wasn't going to play.
Before Westwood every goalkeeper we signed in the Championship - especially the foreign ones.
I thought the Hondurans and the Purivian were actually signed by Richardson (can't think why)?
Strachan even admitted he had never heard of Zuniga until Richardson told him he had signed.
Andy Marshall player of the year 2006-7
thornton was from our academy...
Dion Dublin?
He is sh!t because he wouldn't play for us after we sold him to Villa
I thought the Hondurans and the Purivian were actually signed by Richardson (can't think why)?
Strachan even admitted he had never heard of Zuniga until Richardson told him he had signed.
He was a good player, but he refused to play for us whilst still contracted to do so.
After our beloved chairman had sold him though.
Says a lot about Strachan I suppose.
Doesn't make any difference.
It does to a lot of people. He wasn't wanted, so why should he have played?
After our beloved chairman had sold him though.
It does to a lot of people. He wasn't wanted, so why should he have played?
It does to a lot of people. He wasn't wanted, so why should he have played?
Stick it in the saddo thread where it belongs otherwise you'll be as bad as all those people that turn into every thread into a "Thorn is crap/bald/fat" thread!
You mean the saddo thread where you are a main contributor?
No, that's you :facepalm:
I'd argue about a few of those, though Wright was excellent when he played and several others did a job or weren't given a fair crack.
Every club has just as long a list of players like this though, it's just part of the game. There's also a list just as long of players we took a chance on and it paid off. No sense in dwelling on the failures.
What about Runnar Norman? Was he a Richardson signing? Guess none of it was poor Wee Gordon's fault with a nasty baddy chairman like Richardson..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?