Nick
Administrator
Looks like he has a new lawyer - http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/making-murderer-steven-averys-lawyer-7236406
Looks like he has a new lawyer - http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/making-murderer-steven-averys-lawyer-7236406
Going to be interesting to see what happens from here on in. There will be huge pressure for the case to be looked at again.
Already there's been claims that one of the jurors has said they didn't think he was guilty but feared for their safety if they didn't give a guilty verdict.
There's also been claims that one juror was the father of the Manitowoc Sheriff's deputy and another juror's wife worked for the Manitowoc County Clerks Office!
How far are you through the series? I think it is the last one when they speak to a juror.
Started watching this evening on Netflix. Managed 10 minutes before we switched off. Sorry guys. I thought this was as dull as dishwater.
Considering it is a 10 hr long show I would have to say giving it 10 mins is not really giving it a go at all.Started watching this evening on Netflix. Managed 10 minutes before we switched off. Sorry guys. I thought this was as dull as dishwater.
I think what put me and the missus of was that it looked like it was done in a "documentary" type way. I remember looking forward to "The Blair Witch Project" years ago (not the same type of film obviously!), and thought it was shite because of the way in which it had been "filmed". I'll take your word for it Nick and Otis. Maybe give it a go again. I remember your comments on Fargo after I said it looked shite, and yes, after an episode or two, I was hooked!
I know what you mean, he seemed convinced that Avery and Dassey were guilty despite nearly all the evidence being tainted in one way or another and didn't once question the crappy police work or any of the flimsy arguments or flawed evidence.Got to the end now. The victims brother seemed shifty to more, think he knows more than he's letting on.
Was taking every opportunity to be on TV and always smirking. If you were a relative wouldn't you want to know the truth? If it was me I wouldn't be happy after that trial.
Exactly! And the Dassey confessions should have been thrown straight out of court and never been presented to a jury.Interesting theory here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/201...ery-brendan-dassey-_n_9048104.html?1453460947
Watched episode 9 last night. Can't believe the young lad was convicted. Based on the evidence that was put forward in both cases neither would be in jail in this country. Far too much doubt.
Exactly! And the Dassey confessions should have been thrown straight out of court and never been presented to a jury.
I think that part of it is the most scandalous aspect of all.
Even if you were 100% convinced Avery did it there's no way Dassey should be locked up or even allowed to give evidence. How anyone could watch the tape of his interview and think he was involved or in any way a reliable witness is beyond me.
Brand new programme on the ID channel, Steven Avery, Innocent or Guilty.
Not a patch on the wonderful documentary, but the prosecutor gets to have his say about evidence not mentioned in the documentary and it is also said that some woman has agreed to take on Avery's appeal for innocence.
Haven't watched it yet, is it the prosecution putting their side out?Is it just me that doesn't get the "missing evidence" from the trial .......... it was either actually in there, or doesn't prove it was him at all.
Yes. Having a right old moan about the documentary and stuff left out.
One bit was interesting, that a nurse said she used the needle on the test tube. Word is they do it to every tube to get the blood in the tube.
Yep, you would have said so. Prosecution guy (Kranz?) Says a nurse admitted to putting the syringe in the tube and he says 'and you know what? They do that for EVERY sample!'Surely if they do that, it isn't air / water tight? Wouldn't they just take the lid off?
Brand new programme on the ID channel, Steven Avery, Innocent or Guilty.
Not a patch on the wonderful documentary, but the prosecutor gets to have his say about evidence not mentioned in the documentary and it is also said that some woman has agreed to take on Avery's appeal for innocence.
Yep, you would have said so. Prosecution guy (Kranz?) Says a nurse admitted to putting the syringe in the tube and he says 'and you know what? They do that for EVERY sample!'
Two things sprang to mind. If that was the case, surely the defence would know that, it being a standard practice and secondly, the defence didn't seem to refute that claim.
They still say though that the tube had been tampered with, because there was blood between the cap and the tube.
Oh Nick!!! Dear me!!I am no nurse, but common sense says if they have holes in the top they can get contaminated.
I am no nurse, but common sense says if they have holes in the top they can get contaminated.
Plus it wasn't just that there was a hole in the top, the security seal on the box containing the sample had been messed with as well.
I get the feeling unless they can prove someone else did it he will stay in jail
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?