Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

MR is correct (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter BackRoomRummermill
  • Start date Feb 6, 2013
Forums New posts

BackRoomRummermill

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #1
There is no use trying to blame a single player or formation or the keeper or even the huge crowd. it is just simply not fair

It was one of those nights....... the synergy was wrong for what ever reason.

Also before you keyboard warriors man you PC or tablet do not forget the amazing work the team has done especially recently with SUFC away .

We owe the players some respect as they have given us some amazing performances lately

You do the math!

Also remember it is only HALF TIME

#PUSB
 
C

covboy9

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #2
hes got a massive job to pick them up for the weekend, yeovil come here flying with Crewe giving them the blue print of how to beat us and Gary Johnson always does well v us, id much rather we wernt playing at home this wkend, i dont worry when we are on the road
 

davebow87

New Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #3
I assume you mean maths??
 

BackRoomRummermill

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #4
davebow87 said:
I assume you mean maths??
Click to expand...

hmmm yes i mean MATH.........., have to been to school? yet ?
 
G

ggrady

New Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #5
I agreed with you until you said 'you do the math' now anything you said is totally wrong.
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #6
Actually the players have done the business away and in many cup ties. The home fans have seen a mediocre set of performances... Unconvincing, disjointed and always likely to concede.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #7
The blueprint is meaningless, last night was a freak result. Play like that saturday and they'll win.
 

BackRoomRummermill

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #8
The Math is is exactly what it is all about !!! so why disagree................... It did not add up !!!
 
C

CovFan

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #9
We need to treat it like a freak result that 99/100 times we would have won. That's the only way we are going to get over it. If we play against Yeovil like we did against Crewe I think we will win and win comfortably.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #10
Both math & maths are the same thing - math is mainly North American "English" I understand...PROPER (?) English is maths...which might seem like an absolute contradiction. After all English is a spoken language...or a native of England. I need a lie down now
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #11
"Play like that Saturday and we'll win". Are you sure? Point is we keep conceding don't we? we could score 3 but will we also let in 3? that's my concern at the moment.
 
C

CovFan

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #12
Might have worded that wrong, if we play like we did in the first half I think we'll win. We overcommitted in the second half last night looking for that first goal. I can't see Robins making that mistake again.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #13
Paxman II said:
"Play like that Saturday and we'll win". Are you sure? Point is we keep conceding don't we? we could score 3 but will we also let in 3? that's my concern at the moment.
Click to expand...
2 of Crewes goals only came because we were bombing forward so much, we had the full backs over different sides of the pitch. The CMs were bombing don the wing, pretty much only Wood and Edge were left to defend for the last 15 as everyone else was trying to score

If we are a couple of goals up we should be able to see the game out
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #14
CCFC said:
2 of Crewes goals only came because we were bombing forward so much, we had the full backs over different sides of the pitch. The CMs were bombing don the wing, pretty much only Wood and Edge were left to defend for the last 15 as everyone else was trying to score

If we are a couple of goals up we should be able to see the game out
Click to expand...
We do it week in week out though - 5 cleansheets in 31 league games is not good enough
 

BackRoomRummermill

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #15
I did feel for everyone at the game last night,

We have recently appeared on the forum new users only too happy to slag off the team even worse with attitude............... well like I say I feel the the guys who I know on this site that go week in and week out, I rely on these guys to give me match updates from their phones so to you guys I am truely gutted as am myself.

Thank you guys for keeping those who cannot access the score so easily and I mean it
 

Waldorf

New Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #16
SkyblueBazza said:
Both math & maths are the same thing - math is mainly North American "English" I understand...PROPER (?) English is maths...which might seem like an absolute contradiction. After all English is a spoken language...or a native of England. I need a lie down now
Click to expand...
Welcome to the Grammar Police.
 
K

kepit 2 yusen

New Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #17
fernandopartridge said:
The blueprint is meaningless, last night was a freak result. Play like that saturday and they'll win.
Click to expand...
<br />
<br />
Disagree - if we defend as poorly as we did last night, we will concede more than we score therefore we will lose.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #18
stupot07 said:
We do it week in week out though - 5 cleansheets in 31 league games is not good enough
Click to expand...
We don't concede 3 goals every week though, 2 of the goals were a direct result of of us leaving pretty much nobody apart from the centre backs to defend

We need to improve the defence but not because we conceded 3 goals yesterday but because as you point out we have only kept 5/31 cleansheets

The 3 goals conceded is a bit deceiving, in a normal league game we wouldn't have conceded 3 goals in that game and you can't put too much blame on the defence for the last 2 goals as Crewe were breaking against like 2/3 of our defenders every time as we had completely lost our discipline by then an everyone was anywhere
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #19
We are not normally that reckless at the back to be fair, we tried to kill the game off and got hit on the break twice. It was not good enough but nothing we can do about it, we need to look at Saturday as a must win and attack like we did last night and the goals will come.

As for a freak result last night, I remember we all had similar views at the shrews game not too long ago, so maybe we should bring that statistic down to 98/100!!!
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #20
CCFC said:
We don't concede 3 goals every week though, 2 of the goals were a direct result of of us leaving pretty much nobody apart from the centre backs to defend

We need to improve the defence but not because we conceded 3 goals yesterday but because as you point out we have only kept 5/31 cleansheets

The 3 goals conceded is a bit deceiving, in a normal league game we wouldn't have conceded 3 goals in that game and you can't put too much blame on the defence for the last 2 goals as Crewe were breaking against like 2/3 of our defenders every time as we had completely lost our discipline by then an everyone was anywhere
Click to expand...

I agree with you, especially about the ill discipline, but we have been lucky with the lack of quality in league games - the Oldham game sticks in my mind - they had 3 one-on-ones and missed all 3. You just can't be giving teams that many good goalscoring opportunities,
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #21
Going back to the OP-Dunn is the one who'll be affected most by the result and will need picking up the most. A keeper who's a bag of nerves is easy pickings for any team so I think that despite him not being up to the mark, with Murphy out he is the best we're stuck with-so people do need to get behind him.
 
R

ricohman

New Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #22
Math or maths same thing grow up. What age are you 13
 
R

ricohman

New Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #23
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Going back to the OP-Dunn is the one who'll be affected most by the result and will need picking up the most. A keeper who's a bag of nerves is easy pickings for any team so I think that despite him not being up to the mark, with Murphy out he is the best we're stuck with-so people do need to get behind him.
Click to expand...

So true lets not slate dunn and get behind him,he might play a blinder on sat, maybe even a man of the match performance then what will all the haters say. Maybe they will take a day off from the forum
 

ps1948

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #24
Goals conceded doesn't matter so much when we score more than the other team - I wouldn't mind us conceding 2 every week if we got 3!
And to be fair, quite a lot of the goals we have conceded have come in games we have won
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #25
ricohman said:
So true lets not slate dunn and get behind him,he might play a blinder on sat, maybe even a man of the match performance then what will all the haters say. Maybe they will take a day off from the forum
Click to expand...

This is his chance to show his place at the club is justified. He remains very young for a keeper-these games could give him that bit of confidence he will be lacking after yesterday.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #26
Brighton Sky Blue said:
This is his chance to show his place at the club is justified. He remains very young for a keeper-these games could give him that bit of confidence he will be lacking after yesterday.
Click to expand...

He is older than Westwood when he first played for us. He is nearly 26.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #27
Grendel said:
He is older than Westwood when he first played for us. He is nearly 26.
Click to expand...

Still off his prime for a keeper then-note I make no bones about his actual ability. I'm just pointing more to the fact he'll be playing in a pretty crucial league game and we need him in good form to help secure a result.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #28
Would Gary Johnson have been Northampton manager when we bought Dunn from them?

If so no doubt he will know how to exploit him
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #29
CCFC said:
Would Gary Johnson have been Northampton manager when we bought Dunn from them?

If so no doubt he will know how to exploit him
Click to expand...

I didn't know Gary was into that sort of thing.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Feb 6, 2013
  • #30
BackRoomRummermill said:
hmmm yes i mean MATH.........., have to been to school? yet ?
Click to expand...

"Math" has been picked up from US TV imports.. it was always referred to as Maths when I went to school, ermm some decades ago.
 
B

Big_Ben

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2013
  • #31
ricohman said:
So true lets not slate dunn and get behind him,he might play a blinder on sat, maybe even a man of the match performance then what will all the haters say. Maybe they will take a day off from the forum
Click to expand...

With Dunn in and Murphy out of action, who'll be on the bench as backup?
 
P

psgm1

Banned
  • Feb 7, 2013
  • #32
ps1948 said:
Goals conceded doesn't matter so much when we score more than the other team - I wouldn't mind us conceding 2 every week if we got 3!
And to be fair, quite a lot of the goals we have conceded have come in games we have won
Click to expand...

Agree in part. True doesn't matter IF goals are being scored. Yet the sad reality is that since a certain striker has left the club, the goalscoring rate has been cut in half, yet the goals conceeded hasn't!

There is really one result of a team that lets in more goals than it scores - they tend to lose a lot of games!

Cov have hardly set the world alight with performances all season, and on a number of occassions have gained the benefit of the doubt a lot more this season than I can remeber for a long long time.

And lets face it cov were LUCKY to get through against Preston - they had the lead, then their goalkeeper sustained an injury preventing him getting down quickly enough for the ball and how the ref didn't flag clarke offside I will never know.

Even before that we had to scrape by on penalties against Burton.

Add to this now cov have conceeded home and away to the likes of Shrewsbury, Carlisle and now crewe. It certainly has the whiff of the good run coming to an end!

And the fact that the end just happened to coincide with a certain players departure must surely call into question any so-called turn around. Surely if there has been a turnaround, then the good run would continue beyond his departure!

But hey lets not let a spot of reality stop the deluded praising Robins as a footballing genius
 

1nilandwe...

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2013
  • #33
Can we all agree on 'mathematics' and be done with it?
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2013
  • #34
1nilandwe... said:
Can we all agree on 'mathematics' and be done with it?
Click to expand...
Why not 'sums'? It's easier to say.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 7, 2013
  • #35
skyblueindorset said:
Why not 'sums'? It's easier to say.
Click to expand...

I go with sums
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?