I assume you mean maths??
2 of Crewes goals only came because we were bombing forward so much, we had the full backs over different sides of the pitch. The CMs were bombing don the wing, pretty much only Wood and Edge were left to defend for the last 15 as everyone else was trying to score"Play like that Saturday and we'll win". Are you sure? Point is we keep conceding don't we? we could score 3 but will we also let in 3? that's my concern at the moment.
We do it week in week out though - 5 cleansheets in 31 league games is not good enough2 of Crewes goals only came because we were bombing forward so much, we had the full backs over different sides of the pitch. The CMs were bombing don the wing, pretty much only Wood and Edge were left to defend for the last 15 as everyone else was trying to score
If we are a couple of goals up we should be able to see the game out
Welcome to the Grammar Police.Both math & maths are the same thing - math is mainly North American "English" I understand...PROPER (?) English is maths...which might seem like an absolute contradiction. After all English is a spoken language...or a native of England. I need a lie down now
<br />The blueprint is meaningless, last night was a freak result. Play like that saturday and they'll win.
We don't concede 3 goals every week though, 2 of the goals were a direct result of of us leaving pretty much nobody apart from the centre backs to defendWe do it week in week out though - 5 cleansheets in 31 league games is not good enough
We don't concede 3 goals every week though, 2 of the goals were a direct result of of us leaving pretty much nobody apart from the centre backs to defend
We need to improve the defence but not because we conceded 3 goals yesterday but because as you point out we have only kept 5/31 cleansheets
The 3 goals conceded is a bit deceiving, in a normal league game we wouldn't have conceded 3 goals in that game and you can't put too much blame on the defence for the last 2 goals as Crewe were breaking against like 2/3 of our defenders every time as we had completely lost our discipline by then an everyone was anywhere
Going back to the OP-Dunn is the one who'll be affected most by the result and will need picking up the most. A keeper who's a bag of nerves is easy pickings for any team so I think that despite him not being up to the mark, with Murphy out he is the best we're stuck with-so people do need to get behind him.
So true lets not slate dunn and get behind him,he might play a blinder on sat, maybe even a man of the match performance then what will all the haters say. Maybe they will take a day off from the forum
This is his chance to show his place at the club is justified. He remains very young for a keeper-these games could give him that bit of confidence he will be lacking after yesterday.
He is older than Westwood when he first played for us. He is nearly 26.
Would Gary Johnson have been Northampton manager when we bought Dunn from them?
If so no doubt he will know how to exploit him
hmmm yes i mean MATH.........., have to been to school? yet ?
So true lets not slate dunn and get behind him,he might play a blinder on sat, maybe even a man of the match performance then what will all the haters say. Maybe they will take a day off from the forum
Goals conceded doesn't matter so much when we score more than the other team - I wouldn't mind us conceding 2 every week if we got 3!
And to be fair, quite a lot of the goals we have conceded have come in games we have won
Why not 'sums'? It's easier to say.Can we all agree on 'mathematics' and be done with it?
Why not 'sums'? It's easier to say.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?