It reminded me of another CM we used to have...
It reminded me of another CM we used to have...So good from torp as well
It reminded me of another CM we used to have...
Good shot and stop for Thomas’s shot, we have champions luck at the moment the way it fell to Kitch’Love Thomas and Kitching
It was on the volley according to cwr.Nor me , just spunked the clearance
That’s a bold statement from a team with 2 shots on target…Quote from the Boro forum:
'I think teams get beat by their reputation now, including us'
BTA on hand to bury the Simms chance if it was parried or hitting the bar love it!
the aforementioned "whey's" can he hearded even better here, also what a goal
It's the same when Kitching slips before getting the ball to Jay.
the aforementioned "whey's" can he hearded even better here, also what a goal
Except it didn’t, they had 1 shot on target all second half which was a 0.01 xG chance from Whittaker. They had threat, but we nullified them barring one chance that they missed.
Their first shot of the half was in the 71st minute, the Conway chance on 75 minutes and a shot in 89th.
By contrast, we had 10 shots, 50% of those on target and 2 big chances.
Edit: even the 1st half at 2-0, Whittaker’s goal
Was their only shot on target and only half decent chance they made. Other than that, they had shots outside the box or just inside it in traffic.
Give credit where it’s due, we defended well. Made tackles, got interceptions, blocked shots and won ground duals.
It's okay now all is forgiven. however I agree.Eeek yep crass that bloody hell
It’s not random at all. Your points are made to show that Boro exposed us, mine is the opposite and that we defended well as part of a game plan. The stats conveniently back up my argument because we limited them to 1.05 xG and 2 shots on target.You're just randomly inserting stats which don't actually refer to the point I've made. Which I've noticed you're regularly guilty of.
Depends. Both those teams create a lot of xG but both of them are tracking below this.
Equally, if those teams leave themselves exposed, we’ll score goals. These teams have good underlying data metrics but our way form is better than both their home records.
I take games as they are, we’ve conceded 4 goals from 2.66 xG in the last 2 which is ‘concerning’ despite is a slight underperformance. Compared to Blackburn and Watford at home where we conceded 1 goal from 3.75 xG and the narrative was more positive.
To find common ground, I agree that Lampard needs to look at the last 2 and tweak the tactics to tighten up the defence.
It’s not random at all. Your points are made to show that Boro exposed us, mine is the opposite and that we defended well as part of a game plan. The stats conveniently back up my argument because we limited them to 1.05 xG and 2 shots on target.
The difference here is that your views are mostly subjective whereas I use objective data to support my viewpoints.
I’ve understood you clearly, it’s your premise that I disagree with.What in the ChatGPT are you on about. You've clearly not understood what I've said at all.
Do you actually come up with anything original or just use AI to attempt at responding to posts?
I’ve understood you clearly, it’s your premise that I disagree with.
I’ll take the compliment though, safe travels home if you’re making your way home from
Middlesborough.
He will only have a year left on his contract at the end of the season.Unfortunately I can't see him being let go unless a massive fee is offered. There would be numerous clubs interested, including prem. I don't think we had a buy agreement.
If he stays with us until the end of the season and we go up then who knows
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?