Mcdonald or ball? (1 Viewer)

skybluegod

Well-Known Member

• Oct 23, 2012

• #1

Mcdonald imo needs to start we looked so much better tonight when he came on him and mcgoldrick both have a little bit of pace so when they make runs the defense is stretched and we made more chances.

 

G

ggrady

New Member

• Oct 23, 2012

• #2

Ball is shit McDonald every time

 

Sky Blue Sheepy

New Member

• Oct 23, 2012

• #3

McDonald for me. I don't have a problem with Ball but McDonald is a good finisher once he gets regular games and we do need them atm

 

Black6Osprey

New Member

• Oct 23, 2012

• #4

McDonald all day long.

 

ccfc_Tom

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #5

Mcdonald by a mile

 

Y

Yorkshire SB

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #6

Ball offers nothing, don't understand what he actually brings to a football team.

 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #7

so McDonald he does makes us so much more threatening

 

bamalamafizzfazz

New Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #8

Roy O'Donovan :facepalm:

 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #9

cody, balls had a good spell but needs resting now

 

Evans1883

New Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #10

Mcdonald needs 20 to score 1

 

Nick

Administrator

• Oct 24, 2012

• #11

What happened to Elliott?

 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #12

he looked good vs stevenege

 

J

Jimmy Hill's Chin

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #13

Has to be McDonald. Ball looks awful.

 

skybluegod

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #14

Nick said:

What happened to Elliott?

Click to expand...

Looks like robins doesn't rate him

 

jaymo132

New Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #15

Mcdonald injured every 3 games..........:facepalm:

 

U

UNCLE MONTY

New Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #16

jaymo132 said:

Mcdonald injured every 3 games..........:facepalm:

Click to expand...

That's the problem. Cody for me should be playing every game I just worry about how injury prone he seems to be. He also looks overweight from what I have seen of him this season. Has to be a better bet than Ball though. Not sure why MR doesn't rate Elliott, looked ok to me.

 

ccfc_Tom

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #17

Elliot looked pretty lively the times i saw him play, dunno if hes the answer to get us out of this never ending rut though

 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #18

Elliott works hard but is not a natural striker, Ball should be the focal point of the attack but seems overweight and hardly ever wins a header, McDonald is a proper striker, always harrying defenders and knows how to find space in the box - if he was a better finisher he wouldn't be with us but he's certainly the best of the ones we have. Wonder how it would be if we had Cody and Ball upfront with McG playing wide right?

 

K

kevinleftpeg

New Member

• Oct 24, 2012

• #19

this just shows how desperate things are. IMHO they are both not even 'average' & defo not good enough at this level