You can see the cigarette butts and litter for yourself. No need for photographic evidence.
grego .................. accounts go to 31st May 2012 .............. the Olympics were in August 2012
CCFC rent in 2012 ACL figs = approx 17%
if new rent at 400k and all other income same then Turnover would be around 6.9m and rent for ccfc would be approx 6% of total
Which one did you book?
Where is that supposed to be then, in the conference facilities (what i was talking about)? LOL.. your words are not backed up by evidence... lets see it.. this is what they advertise, is that a lie? Say it or shut up!
So no evidence then, OK, you can't substantiate your claim.. sorry I don't believe you..
I notice a new trend here, ferrett & Genduffy trying to establish a myth that the Ricoh conference facilities are "'poor and in decline. "
MORE BOLLOCKS! please itemise the rationale.. I don't think you have any real basis for such a slur.. come on show me, lets see some pictures of worn furniture, tatty decor or something CONCRETE to substantiate this argument.. frankly I don't believe it for a minute.
I notice a trend, those sticking up for the Arena are the same posters who seem to think the club should pay 1.2 million a year rent
I notice a trend, those sticking up for the Arena are the same posters who seem to think the club should pay 1.2 million a year rent
There is certainly a trend about what interests people the most. If people like jack had as much passion for the football club as they do for ACL we would be in a far better place than we are.
You speak some utter tripe. Everyone wants what is best. ACL have offered lower rent, match day revenues and our wonderful owners rejected it. That's the best offer on the table and is a good offer considering what we would be paying otherwise.
My passion is for Coventry, where I was born & live, where my Mum, Dad & their families were bombed, grew up, lived, worked & died, not just the football club.. that is so one dimensional.
SISU are not going the right way about bringing the joy of success back to the City
So having charged 6 times the championship league average we now are supposed to be grateful for an offer of twice the average in this league having paid over the odds for nearly a decade.
You sound foolish.
So having charged 6 times the championship league average we now are supposed to be grateful for an offer of twice the average in this league having paid over the odds for nearly a decade.
You sound foolish.
It's a rent CCFC say they are perfectly happy about. Apparently it's now all about the F&B income.
Robo
The auditors only just signed off on those ACL accounts. As part of standard audit procedure, auditors must take into account "subsequent events" right up to the moment that they sign off on the audit report, so it is guaranteed that the auditors are fully aware of the non-payment of rent and the threat by SISU to leave the Ricoh and renege on the rental contract despite the high courts decision, so by signing off on the prior year audit report, the auditors are confirming beyond doubt that in their opinion ACL is a going concern even without CCFC as sitting tenants and the rent that CCFC should be paying to ACL in accordance with the contract, the law and the high court judgement.
The pro-SISU lobby can now bring up any stupidity they want to "prove" that ACL cannot survive without CCFC, they can accuse me of not being a real fan, they can use their usual tactics of attack and asking non-sequeter questions to try and divert people from facts or truth, all of which will not alter in the slightest degree the fact that the professional auditing company, by signing off the accounts, and in full knowledge of the SISU/rent situation, consider that ACL is indeed a going concern.
I notice a new trend here, ferrett & Genduffy trying to establish a myth that the Ricoh conference facilities are "'poor and in decline. "
MORE BOLLOCKS! please itemise the rationale.. I don't think you have any real basis for such a slur.. come on show me, lets see some pictures of worn furniture, tatty decor or something CONCRETE to substantiate this argument.. frankly I don't believe it for a minute.
Indeed who will find the £30 million - the taxpayer? To do what host Bon jovi every other year?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?