Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Mark Labovitch Comment (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter bigfatronssba
  • Start date Jan 30, 2014
Forums New posts

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #1
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I found this comment at the SGC of his very strange:

ML – I think the Judicial Review hearing is likely to show that there was a conspiracy to wrest control of the club in a way that was going to do damage to the club. Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion.


Is this not what he claims Sisu and CCC were planning to do to ACL and Yorkshire Bank?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #2
Is that actually against the law?

Wouldn't me and a mate setting up a restaurant be illegal because we're plotting to take business from other restaurants?

Is Mark Labovitch actually sane?
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #3
shmmeee said:
Is that actually against the law?

Wouldn't me and a mate setting up a restaurant be illegal because we're plotting to take business from other restaurants?

Is Mark Labovitch actually sane?
Click to expand...


He just spouts rubbish continually in the hope that certain folk will believe it as 'evidence'
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #4
cloughie said:
He just spouts rubbish continually in the hope that certain folk will believe it as 'evidence'
Click to expand...

That's a bit harsh on bigfatronssba ...
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #5
Godiva said:
That's a bit harsh on bigfatronssba ...
Click to expand...

I thought he was talking about himself, or astute.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #6
Grendel said:
I thought he was talking about himself, or astute.
Click to expand...

What a suprise that you should pop up with a yet another mindless comment
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #7
cloughie said:
What a suprise that you should pop up with a yet another mindless comment
Click to expand...
Watch it cloughie......he has a little black book and I think that your name has just gone into it.
 

dancers lance

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #8
' Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion'

What two parties conspired to damage what business? surely one business made a move to protect itself from a business that had already declared itself damaged and financially unviable?
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #9
Tonylinc said:
Watch it cloughie......he has a little black book and I think that your name has just gone into it.
Click to expand...

It has been for a long time,I do have to keep looking over my shoulder,

as stalkers are becoming more prevalent nowadays
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #10
Funnily enough it has been mentioned before. Maybe you meant "sorry if this has only been mention a gazillion times before"?
 
C

ccfclinney

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #11
dancers lance said:
' Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion'

What two parties conspired to damage what business? surely one business made a move to protect itself from a business that had already declared itself damaged and financially unviable?
Click to expand...

I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #12
ccfclinney said:
I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc
Click to expand...

I was always taught never to throw stones in glass houses - for a company that seemingly flies by the seat of it's pants and runs on the rim of legality to accuse others of illegality seems, shall we say, hypocritical??
 
B

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #13
ccfclinney said:
I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc
Click to expand...

I await the outcome of the counterclaim Otium/Sisu/Cardoza/Football League/Tim/Joy any combination could be applied. You understand that I am not making any allegations however what if ACL decided to go down that route?
 
S

skybluericoh

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #14
bigfatronssba said:
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I found this comment at the SGC of his very strange:

ML – I think the Judicial Review hearing is likely to show that there was a conspiracy to wrest control of the club in a way that was going to do damage to the club. Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion.


Is this not what he claims Sisu and CCC were planning to do to ACL and Yorkshire Bank?
Click to expand...

Like a company appointing it's own administrator,who then could not find business paperwork that had serious implications of the company's worth to any interested party, until after the administrator sold the company to another company owned by the same off shore holding company that owned the 1st? Even if they win the JR on sum technicality, they are in bed with the devil in my eyes.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 30, 2014
  • #15
ccfclinney said:
I take it the 2 companies would be ACL and CCC. I will await outcome of this with intrest. Sisu aren't very good when it comes to football. But there not stupid when it comes to law etc
Click to expand...

But weren't they claiming that they had, with the council, come up with a plan to falsely give YB the impression that ACL were in financial problems so they could buy the mortgage from them on the cheap. Surely that law, if it exists would apply there.
 
G

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #16
in 3 words complete this well known phrase or saying,
Mark Labovitch is a __________ ___________ ______________
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #17
Grendel said:
I thought he was talking about himself, or astute.
Click to expand...

It's a good job you don't have any mates. You keep making false allegations against ACL/CCC/Higgs. The latest one was your normal one which you keep regurgitating about ACL charging 10k for the charity match to be played. You know it isn't true........but at least it is a Grendull fact.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #18
Dont put the spotlight on yourself and Mr Fisher, Mr Labovitch....you both might not stand up to the scrutiny?
Two people...conspire...damage....company....illegal? What like failing to publish accounts?
 

Gint11

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #19
Does anyone know the date set for the JR?
 
J

jas365

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #20
Gint11 said:
Does anyone know the date set for the JR?
Click to expand...

Have a feeling its end of Feb, 28th rings a bell?
 

@richh87

Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #21
jas365 said:
Have a feeling its end of Feb, 28th rings a bell?
Click to expand...

I hope you're right, but I haven't seen it announced, and my gut feeling is that this will be going through the courts for years to come, with appeal after appeal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #22
Provided they didn't alter the terms of the tenancy agreement or incomes of the football club; I can't see any way that CCC and ACL could collude to the detriment of SISU's business. I really can't. Can anyone give me a candid example of what they could muster between them?!?
 
T

thaiskyblue

New Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #23
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
Provided they didn't alter the terms of the tenancy agreement or incomes of the football club; I can't see any way that CCC and ACL could collude to the detriment of SISU's business. I really can't. Can anyone give me a candid example of what they could muster between them?!?
Click to expand...
Cue Grendell !
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #24
thaiskyblue said:
Cue Grendell !
Click to expand...

Oh Lord. It was a sensible question. It deserves better than that baffoon trampling all over it with his insanity boots on.

I guess I should also prepare myself to be called a number of terms normally associated with a lady's reproductive organ, once the GMKers have finished their Coco Pops...
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #25
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
I guess I should also prepare myself to be called a number of terms normally associated with a lady's reproductive organ..
Click to expand...

You ovary
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #26
Moff said:
You ovary
Click to expand...

You've gone internal. Very creative!
 
T

The Prefect

Active Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #27
bigfatronssba said:
Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I found this comment at the SGC of his very strange:

ML – I think the Judicial Review hearing is likely to show that there was a conspiracy to wrest control of the club in a way that was going to do damage to the club. Its against the law for 2 or more people to conspire to cause damage to the business of a third party. Rejecting the CVA causing a points deduction even if it meant turning down money you claimed you’re owed is a good sign of that in my opinion.
Click to expand...

As a comment this is priceless.

What about the conspiracy between Coventry City Football Club and SISU Capital to damage ACL?
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #28
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
You've gone internal. Very creative!
Click to expand...

Its a Friday, why not!

I have found being creative does help overcome the boredom of the usual arguments regurgitated in different titled threads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?